Chris Matthews interviews "Birther" G.Gordon Liddy

[Twisp]

Yet another example of the ridiculousness of this non-story. Towards the end of the interview, you just feel sorry for Liddy and all of the "birthers".

Video is towards the bottom of the link:

http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/...f-on-hardball/

You can also listen to the transcript of the interview with the step-grandmother that Liddy incorrectly refers to. It is in the link also.

[coadie]

Yet another example of the ridiculousness of this non-story

Raw story is a filthy website ..Try better next time.

Do you spend a lot of time on sites like rawstory which have porn and other dubiouis topics?

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

Yet another example of the ridiculousness of this non-story

Raw story is a filthy website ..Try better next time.

Do you spend a lot of time on sites like rawstory which have porn and other dubiouis topics?

What porn is on there? It looks like a standard online news site.

Of course, since you can't dispute the video, you are probably just trying to divert attention from your failed conspiracy. Good luck with that.

[MikeinAR]

Originally Posted by Twisp

Yet another example of the ridiculousness of this non-story. Towards the end of the interview, you just feel sorry for Liddy and all of the "birthers".

Video is towards the bottom of the link:

http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/...f-on-hardball/

You can also listen to the transcript of the interview with the step-grandmother that Liddy incorrectly refers to. It is in the link also.

Liddy did what everyone who is presented with the facts does, he withered on live TV. His inexpicableness is humorous.

As a side note, why would anyone care what a criminal like G. Gordon Liddy had to say about any current political event. I certainly couldn't care less what type of commentary he could add to any issue given his past.

[RevDWW]

Originally Posted by MikeinAR

Liddy did what everyone who is presented with the facts does, he withered on live TV. His inexpicableness is humorous.

As a side note, why would anyone care what a criminal like G. Gordon Liddy had to say about any current political event. I certainly couldn't care less what type of commentary he could add to any issue given his past.

Ah...so a conservative's past sins are relevant be that of the liberal should be over looked?

[MikeinAR]

Originally Posted by RevDWW

Ah...so a conservative's past sins are relevant be that of the liberal should be over looked?

I don't think I've ever defended a liberal politician of a criminal past on this forum.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by MikeinAR

Liddy did what everyone who is presented with the facts does, he withered on live TV. His inexpicableness is humorous.

As a side note, why would anyone care what a criminal like G. Gordon Liddy had to say about any current political event. I certainly couldn't care less what type of commentary he could add to any issue given his past.

Originally Posted by RevDWW

Ah...so a conservative's past sins are relevant be that of the liberal should be over looked?

I wouldn't necessarily brush him off for his past crimes. He might be, and probably is, a changed man.

I would, however, brush him off for going on national TV with this junk.

[RevDWW]

Originally Posted by Twisp

I wouldn't necessarily brush him off for his past crimes. He might be, and probably is, a changed man.

I would, however, brush him off for going on national TV with this junk.

Ever read his book Will: The Autobiography of G. Gordon Liddy ? He is a different type of individual for sure!

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by RevDWW

Ever read his book Will: The Autobiography of G. Gordon Liddy ? He is a different type of individual for sure!

I have not. I did read the description of it on Amazon, and the phrase "seeking to free himself from "disabling emotionalism" by slaughtering chickens" caught my attention, lol. I will have to check that out. It does seem interesting, and very candid.

[RevDWW]

Originally Posted by Twisp

I have not. I did read the description of it on Amazon, and the phrase "seeking to free himself from "disabling emotionalism" by slaughtering chickens" caught my attention, lol. I will have to check that out. It does seem interesting, and very candid.

I remember something about "rats" as well. I read it over 20 years ago. And yes, from what I can remember it is a very interesting read.