What About This Lawsuit?

rgcraig · #1 08-27-2008, 08:51 AM

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2066207/posts

Obama is a representative of the Democratic People. However, the Obama must meet the Qualifications specified for the United States Office of the President, which is he must be a "natural born" citizen. Unfortunately, Obama is not a "natural born" citizen. Just to name one of the problems, Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an Indonesian citizen and relocated herself and Obama to Indonesia wherein Obama's mother naturalized in Indonesia and Obama followed her naturalization, as he was a minor and in the custody of his mother. Obama failed to take the oath of allegiance when he turned eighteen (18) years to regain his United States Citizenship status.

The Democratic National Committee is for Plaintiff and "We the People" who believe in the Democratic Vision. The Democratic National Party is supposed to represent the Democratic Americans in seeking honest leadership, Open Government, Real Security, Energy Independence, Economic Prosperity, Educational Excellence, a Healthcare System that works for Everyone and Retirement Security. The Democratic Party is supposed to represent and protect the interests of working Americans and guaranteeing personal liberties for all. Of which includes securing a Democratic Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the President under the qualifications of the United States Constitution.

The actions of Obama, a U.S. Senator, in running for President of the United States, knowing he is not eligible, have been taken entirely without authorization under the

rgcraig · #2 08-27-2008, 09:13 AM

I realize this is written poorly and won't go anywhere, but honestly, it does appear that he isn't eligible to run and no one is doing anything about it.

What are they scared of?

Sarah · #3 08-27-2008, 09:25 AM

Renda, it's very hard to believe this would go unchecked by the opposing party. Maybe it's already been explained to their satisfaction. I really don't know.

Sure would be hard to do anything about it now, wouldn't it?

Baron1710 · #4 08-27-2008, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah

Renda, it's very hard to believe this would go unchecked by the opposing party. Maybe it's already been explained to their satisfaction. I really don't know.

Sure would be hard to do anything about it now, wouldn't it?

If I were running against him and thought he were ineligible I wouldn't say anything, it would make it look like I was afraid to run against him, however there would be nothing barring someone from filing the case after the election.

drummerboy_dave · #5 08-27-2008, 09:49 AM

If this a legitimate issue, it should definately be resolved before the election. To wait and file a case against him after he won the election would be similiar to the farce that happened in Florida at the request of Sore/Looserman.

rgcraig · #6 08-27-2008, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

If I were running against him and thought he were ineligible I wouldn't say anything, it would make it look like I was afraid to run against him, however there would be nothing barring someone from filing the case after the election.

That's true, but you would think someone would be in charge of making sure all is well - maybe the CIA/FBI/FEC.

I mean, we do background checks on all new hires where I work and if something isn't legit - they aren't hired.

Baron1710 · #7 08-27-2008, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

That's true, but you would think someone would be in charge of making sure all is well - maybe the CIA/FBI/FEC.

I mean, we do background checks on all new hires where I work and if something isn't legit - they aren't hired.

I think it would have to be Congress or one of its agencies as they are in charge of elections. I think CIA and FBI are under the Executive Branch. The courts have jurisdiction because it is a Constitutional issue and Congress (which will do nothing).

The courts may be the only way to get satisfaction on this issue, I am not aware of anyone ever being challenged on their natural born status before.

rgcraig · #8 08-27-2008, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

I think it would have to be Congress or one of its agencies as they are in charge of elections. I think CIA and FBI are under the Executive Branch. The courts have jurisdiction because it is a Constitutional issue and Congress (which will do nothing).

The courts may be the only way to get satisfaction on this issue, I am not aware of anyone ever being challenged on their natural born status before.

Well, there is always a first time!

Baron1710 · #9 08-27-2008, 10:36 AM

http://www.americasright.com/2008/08...a-federal.html

A prominent Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter filed suit 8/21/08 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission.

rgcraig · #10 08-27-2008, 10:37 AM

Is this not the same guy that I had the link to?