Pastor Gino Jennings, Make It Plain.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by peter83

Jews

Oh

[peter83]

Originally Posted by Apostolic1ness

so do you personally teach women to use a second covering?

not seeing your point of view, the scripture clearly states that Hair is giver for a woman's covering. No mention of another type of covering but specifically says HAIR IS GIVEN HER FOR A COVERING.

Yes i told you and i will say to you again , search a verse by verse interlinear text to see the diference between the two words used . English translators translate as covering the two words and that is why the confusing.
But out of it there are many English people too that they understand it correctly! That is the Spirit language that we all have the same .
Again is pointless speak for something that you dont want to examine it . Search it and also try to read it with the way i told you before and see that long hair does not make any sense.

I dont teach nothin Woman needs her long hair always because is her vesture.
περιβόλαιον peribolaion (pe-riy-ɓo'-lai-on) n.
something thrown around one, i.e. a mantle, veil.
[
KJV: covering, vesture

But during prayer she needs to hide her head.
κατακαλύπτω katakalupto (ka-ta-ka-lïp'-tō) v.
to cover wholly, i.e. veil.
[from G2596 and G2572]
KJV: cover, hide

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by peter83

Yes i told you and i will say to you again , search a verse by verse interlinear text to see the diference between the two words used . English translators translate as covering the two words and that is why the confusing.
But out of it there are many English people too that they understand it correctly! That is the Spirit language that we all have the same .
Again is pointless speak for something that you dont want to examine it . Search it and also try to read it with the way i told you before and see that long hair does not make any sense.

I dont teach nothin Woman needs her long hair always because is her vesture.
περιβόλαιον peribolaion (pe-riy-ɓo'-lai-on) n.
something thrown around one, i.e. a mantle, veil.
[
KJV: covering, vesture

But during prayer she needs to hide her head.
κατακαλύπτω katakalupto (ka-ta-ka-lïp'-tō) v.
to cover wholly, i.e. veil.
[from G2596 and G2572]
KJV: cover, hide

Your γιαγιά would be proud.

[peter83]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Your γιαγιά would be proud.

hahahaha she died when i was on drugs....but i dont know if she would rere happy because she was Old Calendar Orthodox....you know

[Apostolic1ness]

Originally Posted by peter83

Yes i told you and i will say to you again , search a verse by verse interlinear text to see the diference between the two words used . English translators translate as covering the two words and that is why the confusing.
But out of it there are many English people too that they understand it correctly! That is the Spirit language that we all have the same .
Again is pointless speak for something that you dont want to examine it . Search it and also try to read it with the way i told you before and see that long hair does not make any sense.

I dont teach nothin Woman needs her long hair always because is her vesture.
περιβόλαιον peribolaion (pe-riy-ɓo'-lai-on) n.
something thrown around one, i.e. a mantle, veil.
[
KJV: covering, vesture

But during prayer she needs to hide her head.
κατακαλύπτω katakalupto (ka-ta-ka-lïp'-tō) v.
to cover wholly, i.e. veil.
[from G2596 and G2572]
KJV: cover, hide

Look at the text any way you desire upside down vertically and inside out. The text does not provide that there is another covering besides the hair.
The text defines the covering as the hair. There is simply way around it.

so why dont you teach it?

[peter83]

Originally Posted by Apostolic1ness

Look at the text any way you desire upside down vertically and inside out. The text does not provide that there is another covering besides the hair.
The text defines the covering as the hair. There is simply way around it.

so why dont you teach it?

First i am not a teacher , second did you read what i said to you? it is very simple . I am 99% right. if you dont understand it "16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God."
God will reveal to you if you want to!
But please read what i writed to you man. i write you from the dictionary too! I have and read the original text and they are two diferend words ,please go back and check it for your self boy

[Apostolic1ness]

Originally Posted by peter83

First i am not a teacher , second did you read what i said to you? it is very simple . I am 99% right. if you dont understand it "16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God."
God will reveal to you if you want to!
But please read what i writed to you man. i write you from the dictionary too! I have and read the original text and they are two diferend words ,please go back and check it for your self boy

the one percent that you are wrong on is the second covering.
simply not provided by the text.
no need to get upset "check it for yourself boy" who says this kind of stuff?

[peter83]

Originally Posted by Apostolic1ness

the one percent that you are wrong on is the second covering.
simply not provided by the text.
no need to get upset "check it for yourself boy" who says this kind of stuff?

Please! did you check what i writed?
Look
THis word is used in the last verse about hair : περιβόλαιον peribolaion (pe-riy-ɓo'-lai-on) n.
something thrown around one, i.e. a mantle, veil.
[
KJV: covering, vesture

and this church is used about veil.
κατακαλύπτω katakalupto (ka-ta-ka-lïp'-tō) v.
to cover wholly, i.e. veil.
KJV: cover, hide

Hair are "something thrown around' and veil is "something to cover (hide) holly)
Many Americans too practice this and is a Jewish practice until now.
Paul writed this because men and women used coverings like Jesws always did and do!
Now tell me how you interpet this verse :
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
According to you covering is hair so we must read it like:
"For if the woman does not have long hair,let her cut her hair too, but if it be a shame for a woman to cut her hair let her have long hair'?
Does this makes any sense my dear brother?

[peter83]

Originally Posted by Apostolic1ness

the one percent that you are wrong on is the second covering.
simply not provided by the text.
no need to get upset "check it for yourself boy" who says this kind of stuff?

This will help you :
verse 4 every man praying or prophesying anything on his head having dishonours his head
That is covering ,something you put (whatever, hat,veil) on your head.

[Apostolic1ness]

Originally Posted by peter83

Please! did you check what i writed?
Look
THis word is used in the last verse about hair : περιβόλαιον peribolaion (pe-riy-ɓo'-lai-on) n.
something thrown around one, i.e. a mantle, veil.
[
KJV: covering, vesture

and this church is used about veil.
κατακαλύπτω katakalupto (ka-ta-ka-lïp'-tō) v.
to cover wholly, i.e. veil.
KJV: cover, hide

Hair are "something thrown around' and veil is "something to cover (hide) holly)
Many Americans too practice this and is a Jewish practice until now.
Paul writed this because men and women used coverings like Jesws always did and do!
Now tell me how you interpet this verse :
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
According to you covering is hair so we must read it like:
"For if the woman does not have long hair,let her cut her hair too, but if it be a shame for a woman to cut her hair let her have long hair'?
Does this makes any sense my dear brother?

I read it several times. and what i see is this. The entire portion of scripture is talking about both uncut hair on women and cut hair on men also the meanings and when I see verses 13 through 15 it sums up to me that the covering of the woman is her hair. I just dont see the second covering since the definition is provided i verse 15.