Truth Obscured

[scotty]

man, 20 years ago I would have totally understood everything your saying.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Timmy

Just wondering why it's in "Islamic Issues and News".

Because the Christian truth of other religions, Islam
is obscured, for one-

-and I had just read another
"Radical Islamic axe-murderers are determined to buy
and eat your children" post before this post 1;

and I had just finished the daily game,
(blood enabled, of course)-I think it was
Zombie Islam Killer...Killers, I think,
and I won.

[Timmy]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Because the Christian truth of other religions, Islam
is obscured, for one-

-and I had just read another
"Radical Islamic axe-murderers are determined to buy
and eat your children" post before this post 1;

and I had just finished the daily game,
(blood enabled, of course)-I think it was
Zombie Islam Killer...Killers, I think,
and I won.

OK.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by scotty

man, 20 years ago I would have totally understood everything your saying.

Again, please disable attempted understanding; I'm serious.
Plus, I haven't hardly got started, and we already have a couple
nice postulates to proceed from,
you are now aware of the possibility of one of formerly paired
photons apparently spontaneously re-polarizing
in your immediate vacinity indicating
a temporal time shif...wait, never mind that part
(seen any, btw?)
at least, if not also that clocks
(that you prolly couldn't get up to
a measly million miles an hour if you tried)
disappear at c (which speed it is not possible for them to reach)

and, that apparently the macro-connection
(macro is the..."real" world, to..."us")
of Bell's theorem is obviously being
obscured from you (that second you down there)
at least for...another day, lol.

tomorrow you will understand everything I am saying again!
I'd say we are relatively flying
(but we can just...well, speed things up immensely
if you happen to see one of those photons...)

[scotty]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

I'd say we are relatively flying

Exactly, 20 years ago I would have been stoned.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Timmy

OK.

OK? OK? Ok; tough crowd.

[Timmy]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

OK? OK? Ok; tough crowd.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by scotty

Exactly, 20 years ago I would have been stoned.

You are picking up what I'm putting down then;
At my age, I know better than to actually suggest
you get stoned on a site like this (did I say that out loud?)
even though that often seems to bring you closer to God.
But in this case, I'm not sure that the same advantage would
obtain, as the material is pretty self-stoning anyway--
we're talking about something Einstein proved,
after the clock thing was verified,
that even he sceptified...so

as no other Wu Li Masters have materialized
(silly me, I expected a cloud by now)

Bell's theorem is a mathematical proof...well dang

[bbyrd009]

...What it "proves" is that if the statistical predictions of quantum theory (QT) are correct, then some of our commonsense ideas about the world are profoundly mistaken.

Bell's theorem does not demonstrate clearly in what way our commonsense ideas about the world are inadequate. There are several possibilities. Each possibility has champions among the small number of physicists who are familiar with BT<1979><wow, this book is 33 years old>.
No matter which of the implications of BT we favor, however, the first sentence up there holds.

This is quite a conclusion because the statistical predictions of QT are always correct. <in physic-speak; I'd like to rephrase that for a believer--"predictions of the future that are always correct"> Quantum mechanics is the theory. <let's ignore for the moment the possibility that that may be what qualifies it as what might deceive even the very elect, if that were possible, because I doubt it, and because it just occurred to me. We'll get back to that >

It has explained everything from subatomic particles to transistors to stellar energy. It has never failed. It has no competition. <I'd like to rephrase that for a believer...lol, I'm quoting><ok, so now I'm convinced that this will lead to that which would deceive even the very elect; hmm. but discernment and premises will simultaneously (and more convincingly, in the end) only reveal God more clearly, as they are deceived; ya, ya. And this guy is coming from discernment>
<continued>

[bbyrd009]

<...or at least when he veers, we'll see; at any rate, trust that we don't really care about physics here, per se>

...Quantum Physicists realized in the 1920's that our comonsense ideas were inadequate for describing subatomic phenomena. Bt shows that commonsense ideas are inadequate even to describe macroscopic events, events of the everyday world!

<unfortunately, in such a trippindicular way that I am going to have to dictate about three more pages, apparently 1-3 sentences at a time, lol, and then start working on our point><unless..? no> cont'd