Good for Trump

[n david]

Originally Posted by shazeep

i am an Anarchist (think Amish, tho they are faking it) per 1Sam8,
and if you legitimize them by voting i have to ask at what point your 2A right becomes a responsibility :|

Are you suggesting what I think you're suggesting? Please explain.

Originalist suggested a revolution earlier, which I mistook to believe he meant armed revolt and killing people. It was later clarified as meaning "Refusual to comply and daring Hillary to come get the guns," which is more an act of civil disobedience than revolution.

What do you mean with the part in bold?

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by TGBTG

She later apologized after getting criticized for that statement

Yes an apology, a statement like "I made a mistake", a simple disavowing of the terrorist's dad in prime seating, etc gets the benefit of the doubt from the MSM. But they will howl for DAYS because Trump is a meanie.

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by TGBTG

Oh please, it's pretty obvious, c'mon..lol

These were his words -

“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Mr. Trump said, as the crowd began to boo. He quickly added: “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”

What's your explanation for what only 2A people can do AFTER Clinton "gets to pick her judges" ??

For her to be picking judges, the election would have been won by Clinton, so he obviously did NOT mean having 2A people using the power of voting.

The Donald even went as far as to specifically say nobody besides 2A people will be able to do anything about the situation AFTER Clinton picks her judges...hahaha...that's as obvious as it can get.

He's not advocating assassination---I think he meant, "I dare you try to take the guns from the 2A people".

So this is catastrophic news while we have HARD EVIDENCE Shillary was selling her influence as Secretary of State. The Dems are pathetic, the media is pathetic, and the #nevertrumpers are pathetic.

[n david]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Yes an apology, a statement like "I made a mistake", a simple disavowing of the terrorist's dad in prime seating, etc gets the benefit of the doubt from the MSM. But they will howl for DAYS because Trump is a meanie.

We already know the media is biased. If there was any doubt, wikileaks' leaked DNC/Media emails should have erased it. The GOP nominee should stop saying stupid things and picking stupid fights. Don't give the biased media what they want.

It's not that difficult. The GOP nominee should stick to the issues. Stop the petty, schoolyard insults and act like a grown-up who is the GOP nominee for POTUS.

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by Aquila

You'd think that after 30 years somebody would be able to make something stick on Hillary if she's truly that criminal. So, in my opinion, either it's a witch-hunt.... or we have the must inept Republicans and Justice Department staff in the history of the human race.

You're probably the most gullible person I've ever encountered on AFF. Why don't the Bushes get hounded by accusations of corruption? Not even Obama has this kind of reputation. Name another political figure like the Clintons that get accused again and again. After a while if it walks and talks like a duck...

[n david]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

He's not advocating assassination---I think he meant, "I dare you try to take the guns from the 2A people".

So this is catastrophic news while we have HARD EVIDENCE Shillary was selling her influence as Secretary of State. The Dems are pathetic, the media is pathetic, and the #nevertrumpers are pathetic.

Nope, he was speaking about her nominating SCOTUS Justices.

This whining about the media being biased is pathetic. We know this. Stop giving them stories to print. They don't even have to do anything for a story. Just wait a day or two and the GOP nominee will attack someone or say something stupid.

[n david]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Name another political figure like the Clintons that get accused again and again. After a while if it walks and talks like a duck...

On this I agree. If there's smoke there's.....Malia with a joint! HAHAHA

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by Aquila

I can't believe this. Men of greater intellect and moral integrity is defending Trump. Folks, he's an idiot. And he's as corrupt and morally bankrupt as anyone could say Hillary is....if not more.

Most of Trump's defenders are lowering themselves to his level by defending him. That I find indefensible. It also testifies that many of these so called Evangelical leaders and born again believers supporting Trump would vote for the devil himself over a Democrat.

Well first, genius, it should be "men of greater intellect and moral integrity ARE defending Trump". Prove his corruption on the level of Hillary. Has he ever sold the public trust for $$$ and influence? Has he gone on record lying again and again to the public on the level of Hillary? Is he guilty of besmirching the reputations of his spouse's sexual victims? Seriously, you have to be an absolute partisan hack, a blind ideologue, or a sad, pity-me-because-my-candidate-lost Republican to think that Trump is as bad or even worse than Hillary.

[n david]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Well first, genius, it should be "men of greater intellect and moral integrity ARE defending Trump". Prove his corruption on the level of Hillary. Has he ever sold the public trust for $$$ and influence? Has he gone on record lying again and again to the public on the level of Hillary? Is he guilty of besmirching the reputations of his spouse's sexual victims? Seriously, you have to be an absolute partisan hack, a blind ideologue, or a sad, pity-me-because-my-candidate-lost Republican to think that Trump is as bad or even worse than Hillary.

"On the level of Hillary" - hilarious, since she's such an extreme example. Why the need to emphasis he's not on the level of Hillary, instead of just outright "he's not any of these." Well, because he is all of those.

Just not "on the level of Hillary."

"Has he ever sold the public trust for $$$ and influence?" Yes
"Has he gone on record lying again and again to the public" Yes
"Is he guilty of besmirching [the] reputations" Yes

You have to be an absolute partisan hack, a blind ideologue to think Trump isn't as bad or even worse than Hillary.

[shazeep]

yup

Originally Posted by n david

We already know the media is biased. If there was any doubt, wikileaks' leaked DNC/Media emails should have erased it. The GOP nominee should stop saying stupid things and picking stupid fights. Don't give the biased media what they want.

It's not that difficult. The GOP nominee should stick to the issues. Stop the petty, schoolyard insults and act like a grown-up who is the GOP nominee for POTUS.

i think he might be serving a vital function