Libertarian economics.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Socialite

Well, because Libertarians believe they are protected. Makes sense they'd congregate there.

Drew Carey is a Libertarian. There's a celebrity shocker. Ayn Rand... well, it would seem she'd find more in common with this party.

Many identify with Libertarianism (myself included), but aren't fully in line with all libertarian party positions (even *gasp* Glenn Beck has said he's more of a Libertarian). So... which type of Libertarian are you?

http://civilliberty.about.com/od/usc...bertarians.htm

For Libertarians to be more electable, they definitely need to broaden their appeal to all those groups above. Idealistic Island can be lonely.

So all they have is clever bumper stickers?

[Socialite]

Originally Posted by coadie

So all they have is clever bumper stickers?

Gotta love Coadie's deductive skills...

Bumper stickers? Are we referring to your favorite candidate, Sarah Palin again?

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by Socialite

Gotta love Coadie's deductive skills...

Bumper stickers? Are we referring to your favorite candidate, Sarah Palin again?

There was a reason I posted Cato.org for Coadie to spend some time on. But that would require reading and understanding. apparently anything longer than a bumper sticker confuses him.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Socialite

Coadie, what is the underpinning for your economics philosophy?

When you have time, of course, professor. I would imagine you are quite busy running a hospital, teaching at a university, inventing the cure for horrendous diseases and providing political consulting services... so only when you have time.

Wrong question. Economics is a social science.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

There was a reason I posted Cato.org for Coadie to spend some time on. But that would require reading and understanding. apparently anything longer than a bumper sticker confuses him.

What kind of Economics school does Jerry Falwell have?

you have no idea what your talking about. Back away slowly so as not to get hurt.

[Socialite]

Originally Posted by coadie

Wrong question. Economics is a social science.

Another deflection from Coadie.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/economics/

I've specifically asked your economic philosophy. But if you want to volunteer which school of "economic science," I'll take that too.

You see, there is both a philosophical perspective, and one that uses controls and numbers to establish theories (like the Austrian method that keeps getting mentioned).

But again... just another deflection.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Socialite

Another deflection from Coadie.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/economics/

I've specifically asked your economic philosophy. But if you want to volunteer which school of "economic science," I'll take that too.

You see, there is both a philosophical perspective, and one that uses controls and numbers to establish theories (like the Austrian method that keeps getting mentioned).

But again... just another deflection.

We are at 65 posts on this topic and still nothing coherent from you about economics. You represent the liberaltarians well.

In a debate, they will just play stupid also?

The question of this thread is about libertrarian economics.

Our economy is in danger and if the Libs tarians can't think about the economy, we need to avoid them. We have enough disaster already.

[Socialite]

Originally Posted by coadie

We are at 65 posts on this topic and still nothing coherent from you about economics. You represent the liberaltarians well.

In a debate, they will just play stupid also?

The question of this thread is about libertrarian economics.

Our economy is in danger and if the Libs tarians can't think about the economy, we need to avoid them. We have enough disaster already.

Maybe instead of playing shrink, you can just state your case. What is it about Libertarian Economics you have an issue with? And careful how you summarize libertarian economics...

We are at 66 posts now. If you'll look back to page 1-3, you'll see I took my time and actually responded to your posts. It wasn't what you wanted, but it was my response. If my response was not coherent to you I'm afraid the problem an internal one for you this time.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Socialite

Maybe instead of playing shrink, you can just state your case. What is it about Libertarian Economics you have an issue with? And careful how you summarize libertarian economics...

We are at 66 posts now. If you'll look back to page 1-3, you'll see I took my time and actually responded to your posts. It wasn't what you wanted, but it was my response. If my response was not coherent to you I'm afraid the problem an internal one for you this time.

Apparently there is nothing in Libertarian economics to have an issue with. They seem to be represented by ignorance and no science.

Kinda like witch doctors. They hate modern medicine and Medical doctors but they have nothing that is tested and proven.

Carl Menger's 1871 book, Principles of Economics

this is 2010. We use checks and electronic transfer of funds.

[Cindy]