|
Tab Menu 1
Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
|
|
05-29-2008, 10:35 PM
|
|
My Family!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1
St. Mark
I don't want to be offensive to anybody but I honestly have seen some Penteostal women who were so manly in their phsique that a little of that dreaded makeup and jewelry would have greatly enhanced their feminisim and made more of a differentiation between them and men.
|
PO's not going to like this!
__________________
Master of Science in Applied Disgruntled Religious Theorist Wrangling
PhD in Petulant Tantrum Quelling
Dean of the School of Hard Knocks
|
05-29-2008, 10:35 PM
|
|
Blessed!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,320
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark
Please don't twist what I am saying Ladies.
I'm by no means saying that a dress code brings a revival or move of God. however, it does appear that when AG let go of all any rules, in general, they lost something too. Now they are arguing over whether tongues are even the evidence!!! how many rules do we change before we get to that point???
|
To me...it is not a matter of DRESS but of wanting more of Him. Are they seeking Him? Wanting Him? Praying? Consecrating? Remember...if my people which are called by name shall humble themselves and pray...THEN.....
Are they playing church or having church?
|
05-29-2008, 10:37 PM
|
|
Not riding the train
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1
St. Mark
I don't want to be offensive to anybody but I honestly have seen some Penteostal women who were so manly in their phsique that a little of that dreaded makeup and jewelry would have greatly enhanced their feminisim and made more of a differentiation between them and men.
|
CC1,
If a woman looks manly makeup and jewelry is not going to help, IMO. How could it?
|
05-29-2008, 10:37 PM
|
|
Blessed!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,320
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pragmatist
If people let up on their consecration to God when they ease up on dress standards, it could be a church's downfall. If people increase their consecration while ceasing to focus so much on outward appearance, we could have revival!
|
Ditto!
|
05-29-2008, 10:41 PM
|
Pot Stirrer
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCaliUPC
StMark...what do you mean by the younger ones look like the rest of America? Are you talking about the women? They may cut their hair and wear some make-up (down here...not so heavy....very light), but they still wear skirts.
|
I think that traditions often make more people connected to church life.
I concur that some traditions are more of a distraction then any good they do but not all.
|
05-29-2008, 10:42 PM
|
Pot Stirrer
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
CC1,
If a woman looks manly makeup and jewelry is not going to help, IMO. How could it?
|
good point!
|
05-29-2008, 10:42 PM
|
|
Rebel with a cause.
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 6,813
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark
I think that traditions often make more people connected to church life.I concur that some traditions are more of a distraction then any good they do but not all.
|
You nailed it on the head here. It's a sense of belonging.
__________________
"Many people view their relationship with God like a "color by number" picture. It's easier to let someone else define the boundaries, tell them which blanks to fill in, and what color to use than it is for them to take a blank canvas and seek inspiration from the Source in order to paint their own masterpiece"
|
05-29-2008, 11:40 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark
So you are saying that women who don't wear makeup look manly????
that's not going to go over too well CC.
|
No. I am saying that SOME women, who are a bit masculine by nature would look more feminine with a little makeup and jewlery on.
I have seen a few that with their scrubbed faces and severely pulled ack hair in a bun or ponytail looked very masculine.
Remember I said "a few".
.
|
05-29-2008, 11:42 PM
|
|
Not riding the train
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1
No. I am saying that SOME women, who are a bit masculine by nature would look more feminine with a little makeup and jewlery on.
I have seen a few that with their scrubbed faces and severely pulled ack hair in a bun or ponytail looked very masculine.
Remember I said "a few".
.
|
Saving yourself?
All they would have to do is stop wearing a ponytail and a bun.
|
05-29-2008, 11:43 PM
|
Pot Stirrer
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1
No. I am saying that SOME women, who are a bit masculine by nature would look more feminine with a little makeup and jewlery on.
I have seen a few that with their scrubbed faces and severely pulled ack hair in a bun or ponytail looked very masculine.
Remember I said "a few".
.
|
well I agree with Pressing on if a woman acts manly, no amount of makeup or earrings is going to soften her actions
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 PM.
| |