Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 05-29-2008, 10:35 PM
rgcraig's Avatar
rgcraig rgcraig is offline
My Family!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
St. Mark

I don't want to be offensive to anybody but I honestly have seen some Penteostal women who were so manly in their phsique that a little of that dreaded makeup and jewelry would have greatly enhanced their feminisim and made more of a differentiation between them and men.
PO's not going to like this!
__________________
Master of Science in Applied Disgruntled Religious Theorist Wrangling
PhD in Petulant Tantrum Quelling
Dean of the School of Hard Knocks
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 05-29-2008, 10:35 PM
SoCaliUPC's Avatar
SoCaliUPC SoCaliUPC is offline
Blessed!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,320
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
Please don't twist what I am saying Ladies.

I'm by no means saying that a dress code brings a revival or move of God. however, it does appear that when AG let go of all any rules, in general, they lost something too. Now they are arguing over whether tongues are even the evidence!!! how many rules do we change before we get to that point???
To me...it is not a matter of DRESS but of wanting more of Him. Are they seeking Him? Wanting Him? Praying? Consecrating? Remember...if my people which are called by name shall humble themselves and pray...THEN.....

Are they playing church or having church?
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 05-29-2008, 10:37 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
St. Mark

I don't want to be offensive to anybody but I honestly have seen some Penteostal women who were so manly in their phsique that a little of that dreaded makeup and jewelry would have greatly enhanced their feminisim and made more of a differentiation between them and men.
CC1,
If a woman looks manly makeup and jewelry is not going to help, IMO. How could it?
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 05-29-2008, 10:37 PM
SoCaliUPC's Avatar
SoCaliUPC SoCaliUPC is offline
Blessed!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,320
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pragmatist View Post
If people let up on their consecration to God when they ease up on dress standards, it could be a church's downfall. If people increase their consecration while ceasing to focus so much on outward appearance, we could have revival!
Ditto!
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 05-29-2008, 10:41 PM
StMark StMark is offline
Pot Stirrer


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCaliUPC View Post
StMark...what do you mean by the younger ones look like the rest of America? Are you talking about the women? They may cut their hair and wear some make-up (down here...not so heavy....very light), but they still wear skirts.

I think that traditions often make more people connected to church life.
I concur that some traditions are more of a distraction then any good they do but not all.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 05-29-2008, 10:42 PM
StMark StMark is offline
Pot Stirrer


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
CC1,
If a woman looks manly makeup and jewelry is not going to help, IMO. How could it?
good point!
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 05-29-2008, 10:42 PM
Michael Phelps's Avatar
Michael Phelps Michael Phelps is offline
Rebel with a cause.


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 6,813
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
I think that traditions often make more people connected to church life.I concur that some traditions are more of a distraction then any good they do but not all.
You nailed it on the head here. It's a sense of belonging.
__________________
"Many people view their relationship with God like a "color by number" picture. It's easier to let someone else define the boundaries, tell them which blanks to fill in, and what color to use than it is for them to take a blank canvas and seek inspiration from the Source in order to paint their own masterpiece"
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 05-29-2008, 11:40 PM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
So you are saying that women who don't wear makeup look manly????

that's not going to go over too well CC.
No. I am saying that SOME women, who are a bit masculine by nature would look more feminine with a little makeup and jewlery on.

I have seen a few that with their scrubbed faces and severely pulled ack hair in a bun or ponytail looked very masculine.

Remember I said "a few".

.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 05-29-2008, 11:42 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
No. I am saying that SOME women, who are a bit masculine by nature would look more feminine with a little makeup and jewlery on.

I have seen a few that with their scrubbed faces and severely pulled ack hair in a bun or ponytail looked very masculine.

Remember I said "a few".


.
Saving yourself?

All they would have to do is stop wearing a ponytail and a bun.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 05-29-2008, 11:43 PM
StMark StMark is offline
Pot Stirrer


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
No. I am saying that SOME women, who are a bit masculine by nature would look more feminine with a little makeup and jewlery on.

I have seen a few that with their scrubbed faces and severely pulled ack hair in a bun or ponytail looked very masculine.

Remember I said "a few".

.


well I agree with Pressing on if a woman acts manly, no amount of makeup or earrings is going to soften her actions
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**** Are the NCO and AWCF "raiding" the UPCI or providing a "safety net"? **** SDG The D.A.'s Office 373 02-06-2012 01:01 AM
Has "Church" become a "Family Business"?? SecretWarrior Fellowship Hall 70 06-09-2008 08:41 AM
What Does "Joint" or "Fellow" Heirs with Christ? Praxeas Fellowship Hall 2 01-13-2008 02:12 AM
It seems the word "Seperation" varies as much as "Holiness" does??? revrandy Fellowship Hall 20 09-29-2007 12:39 PM
Seven kids get "it" or "Him" at youth camp Sherri Fellowship Hall 10 07-16-2007 01:57 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.