Trump 2016

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by n david

Same finance team which has released plans for a flat tax? That finance team?

If his name was Neil Johnson, you probably wouldn't be complaining. The issue, then, isn't the substance of policy, but something so petty as his last name - "Bush."

Head for the mountains...

lol (remember those commercials? Man I'm getting old...)

Cruz is a Bush establishment tool.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Cruz is a Bush establishment tool.

Other than Cruz working in the W admin (and fighting against W in court...and winning), and Cruz hiring a guy who has the same last name...what evidence is there that Cruz is a "Bush establishment tool?"

Cruz's court case against W's admin should be enough to prove this as untrue.

[Esaias]

Flat tax, fair tax, VAT, they are all scams. Until the gubbamint is reduced back to constitutional levels none of these plans mean anything good.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by n david

Other than Cruz working in the W admin (and fighting against W in court...and winning), and Cruz hiring a guy who has the same last name...what evidence is there that Cruz is a "Bush establishment tool?"

Cruz's court case against W's admin should be enough to prove this as untrue.

Neil Bush's last name is not a coincidence, he is a BUSH. Cruz's career has been a product of the Bush regime, as is his wife's. He is a Bushite, his record proves he is an establishment Bush lackey. I go by what he actually does, not what his PR people say.

He is supposed to be an outsider, but he is surrounded with, supported by, and hires establishment lackeys. He himself is an establishment lackey. Just like the rest of them.

[n david]

So his court case against the W admin, which he won, means nothing to you?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by n david

So his court case against the W admin, which he won, means nothing to you?

It wasn't a case "against the Bush admin" it was Texas trying to execute rapist-murderer. Shrub tried to get a rehearing on the basis of treaties we had setting up the ICJ etc. The Court found the ICJ did not have jurisdiction and denied Medellin's appeal.

This was not a case of "Cruz vs Bush" or Cruz fighting against the DC Insiders.

I guess you think that because he did his job as SG of Texas it somehow excuses his support of TPP and his crafting the TPA for Obummer, his support of increasing foreign workers by 500%, his entire career being a Bush operative, his being supported by the Bushes, Graham, Ryan, and the rest of the sleazeball RINO establishment, yada yada yada?

That makes no sense to me.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Esaias

his support of TPP and his crafting the TPA for Obummer,

Wrong and wrong.

Cruz does not support TPP nor did he craft the TPA.

You're beginning to post like Trump....or a liberal. Loose with facts and mostly wrong.

[n david]

Hilarious the claim that Graham and the establishment supports Cruz.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

Wrong and wrong.

Cruz does not support TPP nor did he craft the TPA.

You're beginning to post like Trump....or a liberal. Loose with facts and mostly wrong.

Esaias keeps saying that over and over after Ted Cruz already explained that he is for Free Trade, like Ronald Reagan, but he pulled out of the TPA because of the backroom deals. That was the point that Ted called out McConnell on the Senate floor for being a liar.

I saw McConnell in an interview yesterday, they asked him about Ted Cruz not apologizing after McConnell demanded it of him. McConnell changed the subject and said that he was going to get involved in the candidates campaigns. LOL!

TPP hasn't been voted on yet and now I have to say that either Esaias is still uninformed or he doesn't mind not telling the truth.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

Hilarious the claim that Graham and the establishment supports Cruz.

Did you see this interview with Ken Cuccinelli over Trump's strategic move to blame everyone else that he is losing. He plans to win by losing. I see his supporters on that TrumpTrain whining about the process.

The first video is a Trump supporter (IQ 11) throwing out accusations that she can't back up. Ken Cuccinelli responds brilliantly - and even calls out one of the hosts as biased. Loved it!