|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
12-28-2010, 07:25 PM
|
 |
ultra con (at least here)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
I will apologize to Mr. Smith when he comes to Washington.
|
That was overdue. LOL
|
12-28-2010, 07:26 PM
|
|
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
What do you say Timmy my boy, do you think God is happy when Gays get busted up by their fellow soldiers?
|
God is a righteous judge ... and he commands an army doesn't he?
There are no wusses in Pentecost.
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
|
12-28-2010, 07:26 PM
|
 |
Not wrestling w/ flesh n blood
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,015
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
Adding the "S" was clever ... did you do that in "Jesus name" too?
|
your not worth my time Ma'am
__________________
There is a conspiracy of silence in the land.
The gloves are off.
|
12-28-2010, 07:27 PM
|
 |
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
Jason you continue to love after they express their desire to change, l will continue to love them even if they never do.
|
How noble of you!
The truth is you won't find a post where Jason said nor indicated this. Come to think of it, would you continue to love a homosexual if he was saved and condemned his former lifestyle? Sorry I have to ask... You may have addressed this and I missed it?
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
12-28-2010, 07:27 PM
|
|
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Rutledge
your not worth my time Ma'am
|
That's because I'm all brain and you're all brawn.
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
|
12-28-2010, 07:27 PM
|
 |
Cross-examine it!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Rutledge
your not worth my time Ma'am
|
So if you imagine that Dan and Mr. Smith are ladies is it ok for you to lust after them?
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
|
12-28-2010, 07:28 PM
|
|
Cross-examine it!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
That was overdue. LOL
|
It just fit too well. Especially since I have been trying to get him to come out here.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
|
12-28-2010, 07:31 PM
|
|
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovie
How noble of you!
The truth is you won't find a post where Jason said nor indicated this. Come to think of it, would you continue to love a homosexual if he was saved and condemned his former lifestyle? Sorry I have to ask... You may have addressed this and I missed it?
|
Here's your one of a few where the implication is clear ... the most recent ... two pages ago:
Quote:
Homosexual marriage IS NOT a Romans 14 issue of Christian liberty. Liberty is often times used as a cloak for ungodliness. The argument is essentially "don't condemn me, I'm in liberty." Metropolitan Community Church knows all about "liberty".
This isn't a liberty issue, such as tv, music, holidays, dress, and a thousand other things that IN THEMSELVES are not sinful one way or the other.
This is a SIN issue, of which HOMOSEXUALITY is ALWAYS a sin, no matter what context.
|
It's shameful he has resorted to this. As if James was saying Romans 14 was to be applied to the sin of homosexuality.
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
Last edited by DAII; 12-28-2010 at 07:33 PM.
|
12-28-2010, 07:31 PM
|
|
Cross-examine it!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovie
How noble of you!
The truth is you won't find a post where Jason said nor indicated this. Come to think of it, would you continue to love a homosexual if he was saved and condemned his former lifestyle? Sorry I have to ask... You may have addressed this and I missed it?
|
I do remember reading a post where it did sound that way, even if he didn't intend it.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
|
12-28-2010, 07:35 PM
|
 |
Best Hair on AFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Rutledge
U call me a nut for no reason.. That's unkind mrs smith
|
I can rattle off a bunch of reasons, if you want! 
Wait a minute!! You called me "Mrs. Smith"!! Boy oh boy, I'm mad now. I'm gonna hunt you down and take a bat to your head!!
NOTICE ADMIN: This is not an actual threat, it's just me doing an impersonation of Tim Rut the Nut.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
