|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
12-28-2010, 07:14 PM
|
|
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Jason officially can't read.
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
|
12-28-2010, 07:17 PM
|
|
Saved by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
Jason you continue to love after they express their desire to change, l will continue to love them even if they never do.
|
This is the most arrogant untruthful statement ever said about me here on AFF.
For the first time on AFF I am going to say three word I never have: "I am offended."
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards
"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship
"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
|
12-28-2010, 07:17 PM
|
 |
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
I know what we can attribute the deterioration of your posts to;
The fall.
Something must have happened to your brain.
I feel like I get stupider with every subsequent post
|
Perhaps the "fall" has effected us all differently... Lucifer in his fall has surely effected some with imagined progressive enlightenment. 
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
12-28-2010, 07:18 PM
|
|
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo
This is the most arrogant untruthful statement ever said about me here on AFF.
For the first time on AFF I am going to say three word I never have: "I am offended."
|
And you still owe Mr. Smith an apology.
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
|
12-28-2010, 07:19 PM
|
 |
Best Hair on AFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
Any you still owe Mr. Smith an apology.
|
I don't think it's gonna happen. I guess it's official....he believes that I, as the spiritual leader of a bible-based church, actively promote sin.
|
12-28-2010, 07:21 PM
|
 |
ultra con (at least here)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
Jason I appreciate your zeal, but it would be nice if you read posts before responding.
I have repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly said it is an ungodly lifestyle and a sin that will lead to hell. I have not seen a SINGLE post where Smith ENDORSED acceptance. Not one. It does seem to be yourself which cannot separate the sin from the sinner.
|
Jason, you are really starting to cross the line from sad to... whatever.
The post quoted was #520 or so and was repeated before and since why do you insist on throwing down on what NO ONE has said? Please, is your position so untenable that you have to keep resorting to libel? No one has said homosexuality is not a sin.
This is starting to be beneath you.
|
12-28-2010, 07:22 PM
|
 |
Not wrestling w/ flesh n blood
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,015
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith
Should I ask to meet this nut in a dark alley? He loves to throw around threats of physical violence, doesn't he? He's probably one of those guys that types a tough game and is scared of his own shadow. Whatdya think....should I take him on??  |
U call me a nut for no reason.. That's unkind mrs smith
__________________
There is a conspiracy of silence in the land.
The gloves are off.
|
12-28-2010, 07:22 PM
|
 |
Cross-examine it!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
And you still owe Mr. Smith an apology.
|
I will apologize to Mr. Smith when he comes to Washington.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
|
12-28-2010, 07:24 PM
|
|
Cross-examine it!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Rutledge
U call me a nut for no reason.. That's unkind mrs smith
|
What do you say Timmy my boy, do you think God is happy when Gays get busted up by their fellow soldiers?
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
|
12-28-2010, 07:24 PM
|
|
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Rutledge
U call me a nut for no reason.. That's unkind mrs smith
|
Adding the "S" was clever ... did you do that in "Jesus name" too?
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:39 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
