|
Tab Menu 1
Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
|
|
12-28-2010, 07:05 PM
|
Saved by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovie
And I too am happy for that. I really think you are and even Mr. Smith - though I doubt those feeling have reciprocation from him.
I would truly like to know, with all the passion of the debate aside, which approach works best. I see it similar to the "permissive" or "tough love" debate in raising teenagers.
I realize the debate is to personal and emotionally charged to give many real life examples. But, I am curious whether the approach taken by Mr. Smith (attending homosexual weddings and blessing them with gifts etc.) actually results in people getting saved and leaving the homosexual lifestyle. That is, after all, the bottom line if we say that the real love of God is our motivation.
|
I had not thought of this in the context you mention. You know when I was young we were nearly all doing wrong, but there were certain friends of mine who parents would just about kill them if they found out what they were doing (tough love). And there were parents who told their kids "I can't stop you from drinking, smoking dope, etc" so if you going to do it, do it here (at home)." Despite the fact that the sins were the same those that had to do those things to the disapproval of their parents for the most part turned out to be fine (not saved, but their not in prison, hold a job, have a family, etc). Those whose parents didn't have such a tough love approach are for the most part in prison, divorced, homeless, alchoholics, etc.
I am aware that this is NOT the exact same as a preacher attending a homosexual marriage essentially in approval and support, but there certainly are similarities.
If we truly are called of God we need to preach His Word, clearly dstinguish between the holy and the unholy, and make sure the trumpet makes a certain sound. We can do all of this WITHOUT hating sinners. You can practice "tough love" by preaching against sin and still love the sinner.
As far as being accused of not loving people, I'm done responding to such comments (MS). There aree some posters here on AFF who have heard me preach, regardless of topic, I rarely don't mention the need of us as the church to "get messy" with the people of this world. I have involved myself in many things, and plan only to increase that involvement, but I'm not going into specifics here. I am confident that God knows what I have doen, what I desire to do, and more importantly knows my heart. Furthermore, good works, attedning homosexual marriages and abotions (if they could even be called good works, of which I am in doubt) don't save. Thats the message right (which is true). We're not saved by works, yet appearently some think we in some way they are justified by their "getting messy".
None of us are or can be justified by any amount of good works. The motivation for helping should be the love of Christ in us, the realization that He was gracious to us when we deserved nothing but His wrath, and the responsibility we have to be the body of Christ in this world.
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards
"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship
"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
Last edited by *AQuietPlace*; 12-28-2010 at 07:09 PM.
Reason: correcting a name in the quote
|
12-28-2010, 07:06 PM
|
|
Cross-examine it!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
Sorry, I'm not a skirt chaser.
|
Not sure how to take that on this thread...
But I will still Love ya man.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
|
12-28-2010, 07:07 PM
|
|
Best Hair on AFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo
Just keep reminding us, if we don't see things the way YOU see them, we don't know anything. We're not experienced, we don't love people, and we're self righteous legalists.
It almost seems that in a way your attempting to be self righteous by declaring how right you are by attedning homosexual marriages and theoretically abortions, etc.
|
I take it you won't be calling me anymore asking advice.
|
12-28-2010, 07:09 PM
|
|
ultra con (at least here)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Jason you continue to love after they express their desire to change, l will continue to love them even if they never do.
|
12-28-2010, 07:10 PM
|
|
Best Hair on AFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
Hey its my good buddy Tiny Tim. He busts people up in Jesus Name.
|
Should I ask to meet this nut in a dark alley? He loves to throw around threats of physical violence, doesn't he? He's probably one of those guys that types a tough game and is scared of his own shadow. Whatdya think....should I take him on??
|
12-28-2010, 07:13 PM
|
|
Cross-examine it!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
Jason you continue to love after they express their desire to change, l will continue to love them even if they never do.
|
That's it. Nothing more needs to be said.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
|
12-28-2010, 07:13 PM
|
Saved by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
Ferd
Loving the sinner while still in their sin.
|
James, are you insinuating that if we take a stand against homosexuality we ONLYlove the sinner after they are made righteous?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
The alternative seemingly proposed by others is have next to nothing to do with someone beyond perhaps toleration of their presence until they admit their sin, repent and beg forgiveness.
|
Come on, really?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
Apparently not all are capable of doing this. Different callings or different levels of maturity.
|
So if someone is desensatized and influenced by a worldly culture that hates the true gospel of Jesus Christ they are mature, yet if they stand on the word of God, they are not?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
Regardless, I will not condemn those who refuse to eat meat sacrificed to idols. And if they chose to condemn those who have no problem eating it or befriending sinners just as and where they are so
be it.
|
Homosexual marriage IS NOT a Romans 14 issue of Christian liberty. Liberty is often times used as a cloak for ungodliness. The argument is essentially "don't condemn me, I'm in liberty." Metropolitan Community Church knows all about "liberty".
This isn't a liberty issue, such as tv, music, holidays, dress, and a thousand other things that IN THEMSELVES are not sinful one way or the other.
This is a SIN issue, of which HOMOSEXUALITY is ALWAYS a sin, no matter what context.
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards
"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship
"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
|
12-28-2010, 07:13 PM
|
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith
Should I ask to meet this nut in a dark alley? He loves to throw around threats of physical violence, doesn't he? He's probably one of those guys that types a tough game and is scared of his own shadow. Whatdya think....should I take him on??
|
And mess up your hair?
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
|
12-28-2010, 07:14 PM
|
|
ultra con (at least here)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
Sorry, I'm not a skirt chaser.
|
So you are only turned on by women in bifurcated garments!!!
|
12-28-2010, 07:14 PM
|
|
Best Hair on AFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
Jason you continue to love after they express their desire to change, l will continue to love them even if they never do.
|
WOW!!! Great statement!! In the story of the prodigal son (which really was about the older brother's reaction, not the son that ran away), the father "Filled with love and compassion, he ran to his son, embraced him, and kissed him." That was BEFORE his son said anything, before he knew his son had changed and was sorrowful for his actions.
"While we were YET SINNERS....".
Wow!!! I love grace!!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 AM.
| |