hell bound, pick one - Page 5

Evang.Benincasa · #41 07-24-2018, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

Some preach women must wear panty hose. Remember THEY make the rules!

And most importantly....they dont need scripture!

You should know, you been hiding in a house for 38 years. Taking pot shots at ministers. With your whole spiel of "Mike can do it better." But you don't, you are a talker, and talkers just do that. They talk. Imagine if you had been working on getting a group together for 38 years? How many children would of grew up under your leadership. All the beards, all the people who believe in your certain customized understanding of eschatology. It would be a testimony of your legacy. You would be able to have current battle stories on how you have overcome and done way better than Elder N. A. Urshan and the rest of the ministers in the Apostolic faith.

JoeBandy · #42 07-24-2018, 07:13 AM

Ok here is the deal. Research pantyhose and stockings. Now the issue is, some of the same preachers I have heard preach against things (wedding rings, Cristmas, beards, etc.) because if the origin, preach that a woman must wear hose or stockings. C'mon man!!!!

Evang.Benincasa · #43 07-24-2018, 08:38 AM

I live in FORT LAUDERDALE

No way I'm getting on my computer (or any other for that matter) start researching ladies' underwear.

Good God from Zion!!!!

Wilsonwas · #44 07-24-2018, 10:36 AM

Should there not be a third choice for voting, IE, none of the above, cause the only preachers speaking either sentence is a nutball.

1ofthechosen · #45 07-28-2018, 11:11 PM

I ran across this when I typed hose in.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hose_(clothing)

So what do you do with this?

Esaias · #46 07-29-2018, 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

I ran across this when I typed hose in.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hose_(clothing)

So what do you do with this?

Wikipedia says there is no article on "Hose" on their website. So, I guess you or someone else can get busy and write a wikipedia article on hose, so we can all refer to it in future debates?

I scream, you scream, we all scream for Ice Cream!

votivesoul · #47 07-29-2018, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esaias

Wikipedia says there is no article on "Hose" on their website. So, I guess you or someone else can get busy and write a wikipedia article on hose, so we can all refer to it in future debates?

That's weird, because there is an article on the topic, even though the hotlink posted here doesn't take you to it.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...dsvle7svfhgeyg

1ofthechosen · #48 07-29-2018, 09:21 AM

Does this one work if not go to Votives link and press the first one up top. Look what it says. What do you do with that?
Ok that's weird because I seen it in a Google search, but the link that votive posted the top one click on it, that's the article I seen.

And this is what it says "Hose are any of various styles of men's clothing for the legs and lower body, worn from the Middle Ages through the 17th century, when the term fell out of use in favour of breeches and stockings. (See also trousers.) The old plural form of "hose" was hosen. In German these terms (Hose, singular, and Hosen, plural) remained in use and are the generic terms for trousers today. The French equivalent was chausses."

Esaias · #49 07-30-2018, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Does this one work if not go to Votives link and press the first one up top. Look what it says. What do you do with that?
Ok that's weird because I seen it in a Google search, but the link that votive posted the top one click on it, that's the article I seen.

And this is what it says "Hose are any of various styles of men's clothing for the legs and lower body, worn from the Middle Ages through the 17th century, when the term fell out of use in favour of breeches and stockings. (See also trousers.) The old plural form of "hose" was hosen. In German these terms (Hose, singular, and Hosen, plural) remained in use and are the generic terms for trousers today. The French equivalent was chausses."

So women who wear panty hose are an abomination? Is that where you are going with this?

1ofthechosen · #50 07-30-2018, 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esaias

So women who wear panty hose are an abomination? Is that where you are going with this?

I just posted the history of panty hose, and they say they were mens apparel originally and also later we're called breeches. Then I asked what are we going to do with this? But if this is ok, how can you tell a woman not to wear pants according to Deuteronomy 22:5 in good conscience.

So my question is what do you do with this? What's your answer Esaias?