Look folks, I will argue with Daniel all day long, and I completely disagree with many of his theological views, but I have no desire to attack someone who cannot defend themselves.
O please you know good and well Dan is eatin this up
This thread was started not by admin, but needed to be a venting place anyway.
This will be the only place where this will be allowed to be discussed.
In this decision we all are losers. This was not a one off the cuff decision. Many posts, even above 100 were reviewed. Space was given for Repentance and restitution.
Since ya said I was afraid to answer... pilgrim, here's my answer...
I think Dan sometimes put too much sugar on his fruit loops. This coupled with the fact that there was a small group of perpetually angry "cons" who lacked the theological training to even recognize Dan's arguments let alone answer them, pretty much sealed DA's doom.
I saw it coming, I think he did too. I got the impression he was looking for an "excuse" to take a break. That's just my "feeling" however.
Whether I miss him on the board or not will depend upon the theological training the aforementioned "perpetually angry 'cons'" have received since their own self imposed exile and whether or not they mosey on back here.
Yes, there was a "conspiracy." There is always a "conspiracy."
Which cons do you think bailed out because they couldn't hold their own with Dan? Are they the same ones you think were part of a "CONspiracy?"
Linear Mode
