Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #471  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:01 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truthseeker View Post
One thing I hope we agree on is that God saves homosexuals like anyone else. We should show them the love of God. As a nurse I've worked with some, not one can say I've badgered them or mistreated them. I remember one time a coworker was making a snide remark about one at work that day, I told the man something like I don't condone it but still got to show him the love of Christ.


Going to weddings with gifts or speaking of their relationships in any positive light is not happening though.
Amen. Homosexuality can be conquered through God's help! We have lost two friends of the family to aids. One was still a practicing homosexual and the other had been saved. Never did we show anything other than love and Christ to either.

Jesus IS the answer.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #472  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:03 PM
Baron1710's Avatar
Baron1710 Baron1710 is offline
Cross-examine it!


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin View Post
The case was decided in 1878. In 1890 the leader of the Mormon church announced God had changed His mind and no longer desired polygamy.
The price of statehood...
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
Reply With Quote
  #473  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:04 PM
James Griffin's Avatar
James Griffin James Griffin is offline
ultra con (at least here)


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovie View Post
Amen. Homosexuality can be conquered through God's help! We have lost two friends of the family to aids. One was still a practicing homosexual and the other had been saved. Never did we show anything other than love and Christ to either.

Jesus IS the answer.
Glad to see we are all on the same page!!!
Reply With Quote
  #474  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:06 PM
ReformedDave's Avatar
ReformedDave ReformedDave is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,684
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710 View Post
The price of statehood...
The only problem I have with polygamy is 2 mother-in-laws.......unless you marry sisters....
__________________
"I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."

- Groucho Marx
Reply With Quote
  #475  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:07 PM
James Griffin's Avatar
James Griffin James Griffin is offline
ultra con (at least here)


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710 View Post
The price of statehood...
Statehood was a total red herring the man heard from God that God had changed His mind on a salvation standard of conduct.;-)
Reply With Quote
  #476  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:13 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin View Post
Glad to see we are all on the same page!!!
And I too am happy for that. I really think you are and even Mr. Smith - though I doubt those feeling have reciprocation from him.

I would truly like to know, with all the passion of the debate aside, which approach works best. I see it similar to the "permissive" or "tough love" debate in raising teenagers.

I realize the debate is to personal and emotionally charged to give many real life examples. But, I am curious whether the approach taken by Mr. Smith (attending homosexual weddings and blessing them with gifts etc.) actually results in people getting saved and leaving the homosexual lifestyle. That is, after all, the bottom line if we say that the real love of God is our motivation.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves

Last edited by *AQuietPlace*; 12-28-2010 at 07:01 PM. Reason: corrected a name
Reply With Quote
  #477  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:14 PM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
let me be crass.... really really crass...


killing an innocent baby is murder. doing so by walking into an abortion clinic with no reason relating to the survival of the mother, is premeditation.

I consider premeditated murder to be far more offensive offense than robbing someone.... even if you knock their teeth out in the process.

i do believe that someone who has had an abortion is fully capable of finding forgivness of their sin and should be cared for by the people of God.

I cannot for the life of me find a solid reason why a child of God would walk into a murder clinic and hold a woman's hand while she asks for a dr to kill her innocent baby.

Last time I checked (in Texas where you and I are) if a person walks into a store with a buddy who robs the place and kills the clerk, the "hand holder" is treated as a murderer too... even if they didnt have a gun when it happened.
Come on, a woman's right to abort a fetus is legal, and we all know our rights are what our government is all about.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #478  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:16 PM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin View Post
The case was decided in 1878. In 1890 the leader of the Mormon church announced God had changed His mind and no longer desired polygamy.
Seriously? God changed His mind?
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #479  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:23 PM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Having family and friends that choose sinful lifestyles is a hard thing to accept. We do not shun them, but love them and pray for them. Just like my family loved me when I was living a sinful lifestyle. And you CAN love the sinner, but hate the sin. ANY SIN!! You cannot show the way to salvation through the blood of Jesus Christ with hate. He did not die for some of us and not others.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #480  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:26 PM
James Griffin's Avatar
James Griffin James Griffin is offline
ultra con (at least here)


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Ferd

Loving the sinner while still in their sin.
The alternative seemingly proposed by others is have next to nothing to do with someone beyond perhaps toleration of their presence until they admit their sin, repent and beg forgiveness.

Apparently not all are capable of doing this. Different callings or different levels of maturity.

Regardless, I will not condemn those who refuse to eat meat sacrificed to idols. And if they chose to condemn those who have no problem eating it or befriending sinners just as and where they are so
be it.

Last edited by James Griffin; 12-28-2010 at 06:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DADT will still be enforced. coadie Political Talk 21 11-18-2010 05:38 PM
California AG urges court to repeal prop 8 Praxeas The Newsroom 4 12-20-2008 07:42 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Praxeas
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.