Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #411  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:32 PM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgcraig View Post
That distinction is only known by Apostolics. Anyone outside being Apostolic would think this was nuts that you couldn't tell the difference between men and women in pants.
Exactly! I don't know a single ultra con or con man who would be caught in a pair of women's slacks or a woman's pantsuit. Why? Because they are obviously women's apparel!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #412  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:33 PM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgcraig View Post
I understand what you are saying here, but I believe you are talking about a very, very small percentage of people. Mainly, the freaks. Not main stream America.
Hey! Leave the San Francisco people out of this!
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #413  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:43 PM
"GL" "GL" is offline
Superheros are evil...


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 785
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind View Post
Hey! Leave the San Francisco people out of this!
:::THREADJACK ALERT:::


Hey, don't we have some good churches now in freakish San Fran??
Reply With Quote
  #414  
Old 05-10-2007, 01:03 PM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
Alert: You Have Entered The Preztel Logic Zone

I always get a kick out of cons and ultra cons trying to justify the prohibition against women wearing slacks. They are men's apparel yet not one of them would be caught dead or alive in them. Hmmmmm...............

There is as much distinction between men's and women's pants as there is men's shirts and women's blouses.

The only logical conclusion of the pretzel logic here is to have women wear something like Burkhas to truly seperate them.
Reply With Quote
  #415  
Old 05-10-2007, 01:48 PM
tamor's Avatar
tamor tamor is offline
Create Your Own Rainbows!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Adamsville, TN
Posts: 8,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
Alert: You Have Entered The Preztel Logic Zone

I always get a kick out of cons and ultra cons trying to justify the prohibition against women wearing slacks. They are men's apparel yet not one of them would be caught dead or alive in them. Hmmmmm...............

There is as much distinction between men's and women's pants as there is men's shirts and women's blouses.

The only logical conclusion of the pretzel logic here is to have women wear something like Burkhas to truly seperate them.

Good point!
__________________
I hate to see you frown. So wear a bag over your head until you cheer up!
Reply With Quote
  #416  
Old 05-10-2007, 01:54 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
Alert: You Have Entered The Preztel Logic Zone

I always get a kick out of cons and ultra cons trying to justify the prohibition against women wearing slacks. They are men's apparel yet not one of them would be caught dead or alive in them. Hmmmmm...............

There is as much distinction between men's and women's pants as there is men's shirts and women's blouses.

The only logical conclusion of the pretzel logic here is to have women wear something like Burkhas to truly seperate them.
There more things than pants women wear I would not be caught dead in and you wouldn't wear them either. But that doesn't change the subject. Unisex clothing is forbidden.
Reply With Quote
  #417  
Old 05-10-2007, 01:57 PM
Subdued's Avatar
Subdued Subdued is offline
Getting to know Jesus


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
There more things than pants women wear I would not be caught dead in and you wouldn't wear them either. But that doesn't change the subject. Unisex clothing is forbidden.
CROSS dressing is forbidden - as in a man trying to dress as though he were a woman; and a woman trying to dress as though she were a man. There's a difference in CROSS dressing and "women wearing pants."
Reply With Quote
  #418  
Old 05-10-2007, 02:00 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subdued View Post
CROSS dressing is forbidden - as in a man trying to dress as though he were a woman; and a woman trying to dress as though she were a man. There's a difference in CROSS dressing and "women wearing pants."
ain't that TOO OBVIOUS.
Reply With Quote
  #419  
Old 05-10-2007, 02:04 PM
Margies3's Avatar
Margies3 Margies3 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
There more things than pants women wear I would not be caught dead in and you wouldn't wear them either. But that doesn't change the subject. Unisex clothing is forbidden.
But, Brother, I think that's the whole point. WOMEN's pants are women's pants. That's not unisex. Would you wear a pair of women's pants?

And to say that a woman shouldn't wear pants because those are men's clothing (even tho they are women's pants) is as ridiculous as it would be to say that a woman shouldn't wear shoes because men wear shoes.
__________________
Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of a battle ! ! ! !
Reply With Quote
  #420  
Old 05-10-2007, 02:06 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subdued View Post
CROSS dressing is forbidden - as in a man trying to dress as though he were a woman; and a woman trying to dress as though she were a man. There's a difference in CROSS dressing and "women wearing pants."
No difference whatsoever EVERY woman wearing pants is an abomination.
God is not pleased with transvestites!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
News Flash- Ken Phillips says Rapture is within 2 years!!! Thad Fellowship Hall 74 02-13-2009 09:59 PM
News Flash!!!!!!! Upc Pastor's Wife Appears On Tv! SoCaliUPC Fellowship Hall 177 10-04-2007 12:41 AM
Block Buster News Flash - Original LWT Performing!!!!! Thad Fellowship Hall 124 05-04-2007 08:43 PM
NEWS FLASH regional missionary in trouble? Thad Missions Area 415 03-14-2007 08:41 AM
NEWS FLASH!!!...Public Service Announcement! rgcraig Fellowship Hall 37 02-28-2007 04:18 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.