|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
02-28-2007, 07:30 AM
|
 |
Still Figuring It Out.
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,858
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aegsm76
I do not understand how you can possibly post an article from Alex Jones website as an equal time!!!!
You are killin' me!!!!
Someday we'll know the real story. I think my version will be much closer than yours.
|
Did you read it?
|
02-28-2007, 07:37 AM
|
|
Still Figuring It Out.
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,858
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind
|
Rebuttal to the rebuttal.
Equal time. 
|
02-28-2007, 07:48 AM
|
|
Still Figuring It Out.
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,858
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jekyll
D4Garbage  ,
You are known for your conspiracy chasing...don't try to be coy or innocent sounding when you have been pumping out this TREASONOUS garbage long before this forum. 
 |
Nobody is being coy or innocent.
The quotes you pulled are simply attempts to answer questions and keep the discussion about the video.
Perhaps I would see more clearly if people could find it within themselves to take a look at what is there and talk about it. But very few can do that. People rail on about where this might lead. And, because where it might lead at some future point in the conversation is unsavory, they won't even discuss it.
One of the most unproductive things you can do to a person who has questions is rail on them for asking and refuse to actually discuss the issue they present.
That is all I ever get and all that does is feed the fire.
If you care to discuss what you see on the video intelligibly then please do.
If all you are going to do is berate me for even presenting the question then it would be better if we didn't waste either of our time.
|
02-28-2007, 07:53 AM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,396
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digging4Truth
Nobody is being coy or innocent.
The quotes you pulled are simply attempts to answer questions and keep the discussion about the video.
Perhaps I would see more clearly if people could find it within themselves to take a look at what is there and talk about it. But very few can do that. People rail on about where this might lead. And, because where it might lead at some future point in the conversation is unsavory, they won't even discuss it.
One of the most unproductive things you can do to a person who has questions is rail on them for asking and refuse to actually discuss the issue they present.
That is all I ever get and all that does is feed the fire.
If you care to discuss what you see on the video intelligibly then please do.
If all you are going to do is berate me for even presenting the question then it would be better if we didn't waste either of our time.
|
A lot of these videos just raise a whole lot of questions, but never give any definitive answers.
There has never in history been recorded as a plane that could completely take down a building by fire melting the girders alone.
Especially so cleanly and quickly.
Why was there never a forensic audit of the building?
It is quite interesting that inside building 7 these tenants were inside.
Industry
Salomon Smith Barney
1,202,900
GRND,1-6,13,18-46
Financial Institution
IRS Regional Council
90,430
24, 25
Government
U.S. Secret Service
85,343
9,10
Government
C.I.A.
N/A
N/A
Government
American Express Bank International
106,117
7,8,13
Financial Institution
Standard Chartered Bank
111,398
10,13,26,27
Financial Institution
Provident Financial Management
9,000
7,13
Financial Institution
ITT Hartford Insurance Group
122,590
19-21
Insurance
First State Management Group, Inc
4,000
21
Insurance
Federal Home Loan Bank
47,490
22
Financial Institution
NAIC Securities
22,500
19
Insurance
Securities & Exchange Commission
106,117
11,12,13
Government
Mayor's Office of Emergency Mgmt
45,815
23
Government
This list is based on a table published by CNN.com, which did not include CIA, whose tenancy was disclose.
|
02-28-2007, 08:34 AM
|
 |
Hello AFF!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amarillo, Tx.
Posts: 3,611
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron
A lot of these videos just raise a whole lot of questions, but never give any definitive answers.
There has never in history been recorded as a plane that could completely take down a building by fire melting the girders alone.
Especially so cleanly and quickly.
Why was there never a forensic audit of the building?
It is quite interesting that inside building 7 these tenants were inside.
Industry
Salomon Smith Barney
1,202,900
GRND,1-6,13,18-46
Financial Institution
IRS Regional Council
90,430
24, 25
Government
U.S. Secret Service
85,343
9,10
Government
C.I.A.
N/A
N/A
Government
American Express Bank International
106,117
7,8,13
Financial Institution
Standard Chartered Bank
111,398
10,13,26,27
Financial Institution
Provident Financial Management
9,000
7,13
Financial Institution
ITT Hartford Insurance Group
122,590
19-21
Insurance
First State Management Group, Inc
4,000
21
Insurance
Federal Home Loan Bank
47,490
22
Financial Institution
NAIC Securities
22,500
19
Insurance
Securities & Exchange Commission
106,117
11,12,13
Government
Mayor's Office of Emergency Mgmt
45,815
23
Government
This list is based on a table published by CNN.com, which did not include CIA, whose tenancy was disclose.
|
wOW
|
02-28-2007, 09:47 AM
|
 |
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by COOPER
wOW
|
this is the reason they choose WTC as a target. If I remember correctly 80% of the WORLD's bonds were traded at WTC. Many banks and insurance companies were in the entire complex.
Building 7 was damaged by the debris and in the interest of safety, they took it down. They did not do so to benefit Dick Cheney and Haliburton. No matter what bizzare website shows so, there was no conspiracy.
It is now 12 years since the FIRST WTC attack, where they blew up a rental truck in the parking garage.
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
|
02-28-2007, 09:48 AM
|
|
Still Figuring It Out.
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,858
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind
this is the reason they choose WTC as a target. If I remember correctly 80% of the WORLD's bonds were traded at WTC. Many banks and insurance companies were in the entire complex.
Building 7 was damaged by the debris and in the interest of safety, they took it down. They did not do so to benefit Dick Cheney and Haliburton. No matter what bizzare website shows so, there was no conspiracy.
It is now 12 years since the FIRST WTC attack, where they blew up a rental truck in the parking garage.
|
So you believe that they intentionally brought down WTC7 by controlled demolition?
|
02-28-2007, 09:53 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digging4Truth
So you believe that they intentionally brought down WTC7 by controlled demolition?
|
I don't look for why or how things happenned. With the entire "bathtub" smouldering and hot, weakened foundations meant it could have fell on it's own.
There was some fear the seawall would give in also.
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
|
02-28-2007, 10:01 AM
|
|
Still Figuring It Out.
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,858
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind
I don't look for why or how things happenned. With the entire "bathtub" smouldering and hot, weakened foundations meant it could have fell on it's own.
There was some fear the seawall would give in also.
|
K...
I was just wondering if you felt they were brought down on purpose since you said the following.
Quote:
|
Building 7 was damaged by the debris and in the interest of safety, they took it down.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
