Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #341  
Old 05-31-2008, 07:35 AM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by rrford View Post
A burka for the wife and black suit, white shirt and black string tie for yourself.
Hey! Good to see you, Aleck!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #342  
Old 05-31-2008, 08:08 AM
StillStanding's Avatar
StillStanding StillStanding is offline
Beautiful are the feet......


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
Stokes, That is a concern, yes. I know that some of it is tradition and culture but truthfully, those are the key elements that help to keep our families together so why not the church?? It is evident that when we start undoing everything, the dedication begins to wane. In general, the AG is not the church it once was and even many of them have told me that
Any change is always a concern because it requires leaving our "comfort" range.

I think that the lack of dedication is more from a growing lethargic attitude toward God and the church, than a certain "standard" of dress. We are busy doing "things" and give time to God when we have nothing else to do. We don't depend on God for our everyday life like we used to. We are victims of our own success and blessings.
Reply With Quote
  #343  
Old 05-31-2008, 08:12 AM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
NO, you're wrong on this one HO. the clothes did change his attitude and also his perception of himself. It gave him a greater desire to acheive and made him feel better about himself.
You are speaking of something totally different. There was a desire in his heart to dress better in the first place or he wouldn't have put that suit on.

The same is true for the opposite. I won't go out wearing a halter top and Daisy Dukes THEN feel like dressing immodestly. The feeling was already in my heart long before I put the clothing on.

Self esteem, as you refer to above, is a different matter entirely.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #344  
Old 05-31-2008, 08:18 AM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceAmazing View Post
To answer your question St. Mark, I'm not so sure that pants on women is an abomination. I'm not sure the UPC manual states that a woman must wear a dress. If it does, please correct me. It's been a while since I have read it.

That being said, I'm a UPC PK, so I've worn skirts all of my life. Until recently, I didn't even know what scripture was used to support that standard. Even after numerous Sunday School classes, hours spent on a church pew and two years in Bible College. It took a great lady from my former church to bring this to my attention. I'm a PK...how could I have missed that all these years?????

I too question if we follow verse 5 in that chapter, what do you do with 11 or 21?

I also struggle with Proverbs 6:16 - 19. Something there was an abomination too. Like sowing discord? That one just doesn't seem to apply to us today, sad to say.
The manual says nothing about pants or dresses on women. They can't.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #345  
Old 05-31-2008, 10:10 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Those pants better be fireproof.
Reply With Quote
  #346  
Old 05-31-2008, 10:11 AM
GraceAmazing's Avatar
GraceAmazing GraceAmazing is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in the Midwest!
Posts: 769
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne View Post
The manual says nothing about pants or dresses on women. They can't.
THEN, why all the fuss? If it doesn't state that, are we just going by traditions???

If it's traditions and not scriptural, again, why all the fuss?

Playing devil's advocate here...
Reply With Quote
  #347  
Old 05-31-2008, 10:15 AM
GraceAmazing's Avatar
GraceAmazing GraceAmazing is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in the Midwest!
Posts: 769
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
You are right about that. Gluttony is the other sin that gets a free pass in Pentecost LOL BTW, I'm a PK too.
So, now that you know WHY you only where skirts, what is your answer ?
You are so right about gluttony...meant to bring that up too, but you know you forget things that late.

I said I know what scripture is used to support that standard now. I didn't say I support the standard. I still wear skirts, but as for teaching my children it's a heaven or hell issue....I don't know about that.

As for my answer? I think the UPC will go towards a more "liberal" standard in the next 5 to 10 years, if not before. Right or wrong? Don't think there's an answer there. I think that it will be what we make it. Our problems in the UPC go much deeper than the clothing that women are wearing or are not wearing.
Reply With Quote
  #348  
Old 05-31-2008, 10:18 AM
StillStanding's Avatar
StillStanding StillStanding is offline
Beautiful are the feet......


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceAmazing View Post
You are so right about gluttony...meant to bring that up too, but you know you forget things that late.

I said I know what scripture is used to support that standard now. I didn't say I support the standard. I still wear skirts, but as for teaching my children it's a heaven or hell issue....I don't know about that.

As for my answer? I think the UPC will go towards a more "liberal" standard in the next 5 to 10 years, if not before. Right or wrong? Don't think there's an answer there. I think that it will be what we make it. Our problems in the UPC go much deeper than the clothing that women are wearing or are not wearing.
In twenty years, the UPCI will look nothing like it is today (standards wise)! Hope springs eternal!
Reply With Quote
  #349  
Old 05-31-2008, 10:20 AM
StillStanding's Avatar
StillStanding StillStanding is offline
Beautiful are the feet......


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
Those pants better be fireproof.


Don't forget about those fireproof short-sleeved shirts too!
Reply With Quote
  #350  
Old 05-31-2008, 11:52 AM
bkstokes's Avatar
bkstokes bkstokes is offline
Jesus is the Christ


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
Those pants better be fireproof.
You do not have scripture for this remark. The jews that received this command from God via Moises -- both male and female wore robes. There were differences in the robes, but they both wore them.
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24

Mone me, amabo te, si erro

No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**** Are the NCO and AWCF "raiding" the UPCI or providing a "safety net"? **** SDG The D.A.'s Office 373 02-06-2012 01:01 AM
Has "Church" become a "Family Business"?? SecretWarrior Fellowship Hall 70 06-09-2008 08:41 AM
What Does "Joint" or "Fellow" Heirs with Christ? Praxeas Fellowship Hall 2 01-13-2008 02:12 AM
It seems the word "Seperation" varies as much as "Holiness" does??? revrandy Fellowship Hall 20 09-29-2007 12:39 PM
Seven kids get "it" or "Him" at youth camp Sherri Fellowship Hall 10 07-16-2007 01:57 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.