Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Newsroom > Political Talk
Facebook

Notices

Political Talk Political News


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #291  
Old 07-24-2009, 09:47 PM
Twisp's Avatar
Twisp Twisp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
You must be a Darwinist or atheist.

They roundly accuse people that beleive the bible to be pushing flat earth theories.
It tells me you are out of arguments and do what they do when very frustrated.
It is a bad move just like backing up your claims using snopes.
You have a limited education. Obama needs faithful adherents.
Richard Dawkins devotes a lot of space to flat earth accusations.
Ignorant tactic bud. When you get off your fast food job tonight look up Dawkins. He is like Obama Easy to watch and detect his lying. Text book easy. He is also like obama in that he needs control. he will not debate and will not take questions of a surprise nature. it can through him off.
I never accused you of believing that. I just mentioned that he should ask you.

You should probably lay off the caffeine. You seem a little amped up and are starting to take this personal.

Calm down, it is just a crazy conspiracy, you aren't going to change anyone's mind. Calm down and breathe.
Reply With Quote
  #292  
Old 07-24-2009, 10:18 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by gloryseeker View Post
WND Exclusive BORN IN THE USA?
Now White House joins 'birth hospital' cover-up
Spokesman belittles WND reporter, asks 'what reporting' has been done
Posted: July 13, 2009
6:42 pm Eastern

Joe Kovacs and Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


Press Secretary Robert Gibbs did not confirm the authenticity of the alleged Jan. 24, 2009, letter from President Obama to his purported place of birth, Kapi'olani Medical Center. His remarks begin at the 55:27 mark of the press briefing. (Click photo to view)

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs today refused to confirm that a letter posted by the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu – purportedly from President Obama claiming the facility as his birthplace – is, in fact, real.

The issue arose today when Les Kinsolving, WND's correspondent at the White House, asked Gibbs about the letter, which the hospital also used in a magazine fundraising article.

However, when WND reported on the posted images and questioned their authenticity, the hospital concealed the online image, and then refused to confirm the letter even exists.

Gibbs' answer came in response to Kinsolving's question, which begins at the 55:27 mark into the video recorded by C-SPAN:

While you and the president were overseas on July the 7th, there was on the Internet a copy of a letter on White House letterhead dated January the 24th, 2009, with the signature "Barack Obama," which stated, "The place of my birth was Honolulu's Kapi'olani Medical Center." And my question is, can you verify this letter? Or if not, would you tell us which Hawaiian hospital he was born in, since Kapi'olani, which used to publicize this, now refuses to confirm?
We are confronting several people that are arguing with facts. Heavenly uno and twisp are emotionally bound to believing Obama. Neither have used the word Truth and asked for truth. The beg repeatedly for Proof but there is no proof for emotional decisions.

They love Obama therefore they feel he is honest. He would have to hurt their feelings to change their minds.
Even Obama can't prove where he was born. He could remove some doubts but that would even be a longshot with his reputation for deception.

I watched a short video clip and he gave the classic stress signs that are couipled with lying thru his teeth. He does his platonic grin and reads from the teleprompter so he doesn't ruin his credibility so much.
Twisp is mumbling and There are about 15 posts I have not read. Most likely simplistic repititions. Waste of time.
Reply With Quote
  #293  
Old 07-24-2009, 10:36 PM
Twisp's Avatar
Twisp Twisp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
We are confronting several people that are arguing with facts. Heavenly uno and twisp are emotionally bound to believing Obama. Neither have used the word Truth and asked for truth. The beg repeatedly for Proof but there is no proof for emotional decisions.

They love Obama therefore they feel he is honest. He would have to hurt their feelings to change their minds.
Even Obama can't prove where he was born. He could remove some doubts but that would even be a longshot with his reputation for deception.

I watched a short video clip and he gave the classic stress signs that are couipled with lying thru his teeth. He does his platonic grin and reads from the teleprompter so he doesn't ruin his credibility so much.
Twisp is mumbling and There are about 15 posts I have not read. Most likely simplistic repititions. Waste of time.
Hey, something we agree on! Your "conspiracy" is based on your emotional dislike of Obama, and there is no proof for it.

Way to sum up the thread for us. Good job!
Reply With Quote
  #294  
Old 07-25-2009, 12:54 PM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
Prove it




anyone from Illinois will tell you the same thing

That isn't true.
It is called a "bandwagon"
Glittering generalities.
Common bluff tactic if you don't want to be truthful



It is true because anyone in Illinois would confirm it.

(312) 633-6000

So I call Cook county and the receptionist will confirm what you are talking about? I am calling and they gave me another number

That argument not only doesn't work but it is a logical falllacy and it is dishonest by reason of exageration.

If I call the ER in 5 minutes at John storger 312 864 6000
Coadie, you are an idiot. I'll take a week's worth of banning just to post that.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #295  
Old 07-25-2009, 08:47 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Obama's Campaign paid $688,000 THIS YEAR to attorney who threatened sanctions in eligibility lawsuit


In a report filed Wednesday, April 15, Obama for America, the group that collected over $850 million in campaign contributions for Obama, spent nearly $9.5 million in the first three months of this year, including included $688,000 in legal fees to the firm of Robert J Bauer. Bauer is the same attorney who send a letter to attorney John Hemenway threatening him with sanctions, including costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees, if he did not withdraw his appeal on Hollister v. Soetoro, No. 08-2254. citing the disgusting comments made by Judge Robertson that Obama's eligibility had been "blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry."

Expensive letter. We were worried about some new pumps for Governor Palin.
Reply With Quote
  #296  
Old 07-25-2009, 09:39 PM
Twisp's Avatar
Twisp Twisp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
Obama's Campaign paid $688,000 THIS YEAR to attorney who threatened sanctions in eligibility lawsuit


In a report filed Wednesday, April 15, Obama for America, the group that collected over $850 million in campaign contributions for Obama, spent nearly $9.5 million in the first three months of this year, including included $688,000 in legal fees to the firm of Robert J Bauer. Bauer is the same attorney who send a letter to attorney John Hemenway threatening him with sanctions, including costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees, if he did not withdraw his appeal on Hollister v. Soetoro, No. 08-2254. citing the disgusting comments made by Judge Robertson that Obama's eligibility had been "blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry."

Expensive letter. We were worried about some new pumps for Governor Palin.
Again, please post a link to the source so we can all see what you left out. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #297  
Old 07-25-2009, 10:03 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Obama's Campaign paid $688,000 THIS YEAR to attorney who threatened sanctions in eligibility lawsuit


In a report filed Wednesday, April 15, Obama for America, the group that collected over $850 million in campaign contributions for Obama, spent nearly $9.5 million in the first three months of this year, including included $688,000 in legal fees to the firm of Robert J Bauer. Bauer is the same attorney who send a letter to attorney John Hemenway threatening him with sanctions, including costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees, if he did not withdraw his appeal on Hollister v. Soetoro, No. 08-2254. citing the disgusting comments made by Judge Robertson that Obama's eligibility had been "blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry."

Liars will spend a lot of money covering decipt. Truth doesn't cost much.

If I had a lie to cover, I could understand this. Anf there must be a lot of koolaid drinkers that defend this mess and think he should keep his secrets.

Quote:
Secrets are lies.
Historic twusp. Makes the koolaid dringing Obama drones look rather lame and disgusting.
People with alibis that are false often like to attack. Wonder what the hourly rate is for such a cover up?
Reply With Quote
  #298  
Old 07-25-2009, 10:46 PM
Twisp's Avatar
Twisp Twisp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
Obama's Campaign paid $688,000 THIS YEAR to attorney who threatened sanctions in eligibility lawsuit


In a report filed Wednesday, April 15, Obama for America, the group that collected over $850 million in campaign contributions for Obama, spent nearly $9.5 million in the first three months of this year, including included $688,000 in legal fees to the firm of Robert J Bauer. Bauer is the same attorney who send a letter to attorney John Hemenway threatening him with sanctions, including costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees, if he did not withdraw his appeal on Hollister v. Soetoro, No. 08-2254. citing the disgusting comments made by Judge Robertson that Obama's eligibility had been "blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry."

Liars will spend a lot of money covering decipt. Truth doesn't cost much.

If I had a lie to cover, I could understand this. Anf there must be a lot of koolaid drinkers that defend this mess and think he should keep his secrets.



Historic twusp. Makes the koolaid dringing Obama drones look rather lame and disgusting.
People with alibis that are false often like to attack. Wonder what the hourly rate is for such a cover up?
One can only come to the conclusion that you are fabricating these "articles" yourself and posting the contents to further your falsehoods. Otherwise, you would have no problem posting a link to the source.
Reply With Quote
  #299  
Old 07-25-2009, 10:52 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/hemenwaytwo.jpg

This letter reads like the mob wrote it. Twusp???
Reply With Quote
  #300  
Old 07-25-2009, 10:56 PM
Twisp's Avatar
Twisp Twisp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/hemenwaytwo.jpg

This letter reads like the mob wrote it. Twusp???
You sure do deflect when the truth is tried to get out of you. I see nothing wrong with that letter. It is a simple letter asking the other party to stop with the frivolous lawsuit. It is what a good attorney would do. Threatening to try and recoup costs, attorneys fees, and expenses sounds perfectly sensible to me. If someone makes you defend yourself against a frivolous lawsuit, then they should have to pay you the defense fees when and if the lawsuit is dismissed.

You need to show the source saying he has spent $688,000 to this lawyer. It would help if it showed what the legal fees went to.

Sorry, try again.

Last edited by Twisp; 07-25-2009 at 11:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama's Supreme Court pick... Baron1710 Political Talk 88 06-16-2009 03:13 PM
Stupid Lawsuit Get Supreme Court Conference deacon blues Political Talk 14 12-06-2008 12:08 AM
Craziness in Canadian Supreme Court Pro31:28 Fellowship Hall 1 06-26-2008 07:01 PM
Gun law struck down by Supreme Court Baron1710 Fellowship Hall 17 06-26-2008 11:02 AM
Texas Supreme Court vindicates pastor Pressing-On The Newsroom 3 07-09-2007 12:41 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.