Quote:
Originally Posted by AreYouReady?
Yeah...and that takes some work...something most people do not want to take the time to bother with.
|
Hmm, not sure it's even practical in a lot of cases?
If you think about it, you know few other people's povs
at any one time, can read but a few "like a book?"
Of course, some you can read right away,
those with a pov close to your's,
or a pov you once held-
You might also discern a pov,
from illuminated premises?
But we tend to group with those
who reveal similar opinions, and then
shun those who have further revealed
diff premises, having never accepted their pov.
Meaning I don't have to agree with your pov
to accept that that is your pov. We experience
the opposite quite a bit, from one side or the other;
my post agrees with your post, "validating" your pov,
or vice-versa--or disagrees, "invalidating" your pov,
perhaps.
I think this is a signal that what you have there
is an "opinion," not a pov. Now, if I'm married to my opinion,
and you invalidate it, say, I might harbor ill-will toward you,
revealing my premises, etc., when neither of us can really even
have a pov about, say, the Rapture.
And your "invalidation" was quite likely completely innocent;
or not--but hopefully the point is seen that
you did not
invalidate me; I invalidate myself, and then prolly curse you for it, lol.
Or, possibly worse, you "validate" me (same mechanism),
so then I "validate" you in reciprocation, possibly even denying myself
to do so, and set up what ends up being a negative-feedback loop-
-which might
start positively, but never seems to end that way,
and we have prolly all been there, too?