Dora the Exployer @ Youth Congress - Page 28

Sandra · #**271** 08-15-2007, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Theresa

I'm not disputing any of that...

I just question the UPC endorsement - since this would have been SO taboo not too long ago...she would have been condemed for her apparent double standard

how can an organization teach it's youth to be "separate" and to be conservative in dress...and then endorse one who apparently dresses to fit her industry.??

they why cant my son wear shorts? Or my daughter wear sleeveless dresses?

what kind of mixed message are we sending?

Your son CAN wear shorts, Your daughter CAN wear sleeveless dresses.

Please teach them about relationship with GOD, not just obeying a bunch of religous RULES.

deacon blues · #**272** 08-15-2007, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titus2Mom

1 John 2:12-17

Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.

So if a young person starts a business and makes it to the top, do they love the world? If a young man or lady is voted to city government or they grow up to become a state or national leader, do they love the world? How about if someone becomes a CEO, or a company president, or a school principal or superintendent? Why is it this young lady loves the world in the sense she becomes the enemy of God simply because she excels in the arts? This makes no sense to me.

Quote:

All I have to say, is what happened to teaching separation from the world? Avoiding worldliness? If we are supposed to be the counter-culture, then this is really sad. I'm not referring to this girl specifically, but the mindset in general.

I was traveling last week, and our family stopped at a rest stop along the interstate. A man asked me if I was going to Youth Congress, as he saw my long skirt and hair, and my daughter's long skirt and hair. After he said that, I looked around and noticed young ladies everywhere, with sort-of long hair, and skirts that *just* made it to the knees. Not what myself or daughter would wear. Until he had said something, I never noticed any "modest, Apostolic-looking people." After he said something, I had to look for them.

So how can you tell an Apostolic young man from the crowd? Why is the burden of outward proof that we are Apostolic on the young ladies and women? Its not enough for long hair on women, not enough for skirts to the knees (just to the knees), they ALL have to look like you and your daughter. Here is a guy trying to be friendly and cordial and all that was going on in your mind was how they measured up to your standards.

Quote:

Why would we want to hide under a bushel and try to blend in with the world?

It just seems like people want to have their cake and eat it too.

Maybe its not people trying to blend in with the world. Maybe they feel their modesty, although not up to your standards, is modest and they are comfortable with it.

Praxeas · #**273** 08-15-2007, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pianoman

The other pictures that I saw were of her in a formal dress-up presentation. I doubt very seriously that she dresses like that in her every day attire and for church! I would imagine that she dresses more like the pics taken at the Youth Convention.

I agree. But I'm a little surprised that so many liberals are saying such a dress is to be considered modest

chaotic_resolve · #**274** 08-15-2007, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whole Hearted

People hated Jesus too.

1) don't kid yourself. I know Jesus and you, sir, are no Jesus
2) Jesus loved people...something you seem to lack in your post

deacon blues · #**275** 08-15-2007, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

How far fetched is it to think that TG wanted to make a political statement about how he envisions the future of the fellowship at this ... his last Youth Congress?

Let's recap just some of the controversy:

1. An Apostolic TV star is showcased as a role model for other young people.

2. Choreographed Step Dancing debuts at an endorsed event.

3. Gaddy pleads to his listeners in his last message that they too "step out of the box".

Everyone's minds are made up on the TV resolution ... as is Gaddy's ... who is stepping away ...

I don't doubt his passion is youth or that he sought to inspire and impact their lives in a memorable way when he made the executive decisions in organizing this event.

Yet, anyone can tell you ... including as Sherri stated above. This is not your Mama's UPCI. There are some mixed messages that are new to some in the fellowship. We would be remissed to think that TG did not know that controversy would rear its head after this YC.

He has played a role in organizing these events before... Dozens of ideas are tossed about in brainstorming sessions ... but often are decided against due to perceived notions of impropriety or fear of political fallout.

Gaddy has an agenda here. It's clear. As part of his legacy he has set precedent in the policy decision making process of at least the department he is involved in ... His vision for the future of the fellowship does not match those who will be voting no in September. This was Gaddy's exclamation point.

Thank you for your punditry, Pat Buchanan---now lets hear from James Carville and the rest of the talking heads: Chris Matthews, Ann Coulter, George Will and George Stephanopolous!

deacon blues · #**276** 08-15-2007, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

How far fetched is it to think that TG wanted to make a political statement about how he envisions the future of the fellowship at this ... his last Youth Congress?

Let's recap just some of the controversy:

1. An Apostolic TV star is showcased as a role model for other young people.

2. Choreographed Step Dancing debuts at an endorsed event.

3. Gaddy pleads to his listeners in his last message that they too "step out of the box".

Everyone's minds are made up on the TV resolution ... as is Gaddy's ... who is stepping away ...

I don't doubt his passion is youth or that he sought to inspire and impact their lives in a memorable way when he made the executive decisions in organizing this event.

Yet, anyone can tell you ... including as Sherri stated above. This is not your Mama's UPCI. There are some mixed messages that are new to some in the fellowship. We would be remissed to think that TG did not know that controversy would rear its head after this YC.

He has played a role in organizing these events before... Dozens of ideas are tossed about in brainstorming sessions ... but often are decided against due to perceived notions of impropriety or fear of political fallout.

Gaddy has an agenda here. It's clear. As part of his legacy he has set precedent in the policy decision making process of at least the department he is involved in ... His vision for the future of the fellowship does not match those who will be voting no in September. This was Gaddy's exclamation point.

BTW---were you EVEN there?

Theresa · #**277** 08-15-2007, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandra

Your son CAN wear shorts, Your daughter CAN wear sleeveless dresses.

Please teach them about relationship with GOD, not just obeying a bunch of religous RULES.

I'm not saying they cant wear what those things....

I'm just shocked that a UPC event endorsed her so openly and any teenager who googles her name now can say "oh wow - so I can wear what I want when I want - well, just not to church of course"

it sends a mixed message

the problem is, the relationship part is left out - its all about what is going to "get them" - sure they need to be "got" to a certian extent...

but teach them how to GET IT FOR THEMSELVES and not harp on them for silly things - teach them relationship with God so when they are at school or away from the church - they can maintain their walk with God

Seems to me like we are trying to entertain them - to compete with other venues for their attention...

we arent focused on giving them what they need to survive.

Cram standards down their throats, entertain the heck out of them with sticks and flags....

but dont teach them about who, why, where, when and what....

balance and consistancy...

and I dont see that

#**278** 08-15-2007, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pianoman

The other pictures that I saw were of her in a formal dress-up presentation. I doubt very seriously that she dresses like that in her every day attire and for church! I would imagine that she dresses more like the pics taken at the Youth Convention.

A lot of times stars get to wear a dress and get paid from designers to wear the dress....maybe this way the case...maybe she used that money to attend Youth Congress!

deacon blues · #**279** 08-15-2007, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whole Hearted

I have a pair tree in my yard AI know it is a pair tree by the fruit it bears, by the type of leaves it has and the type of bark. I also have a plume tree and a peach tree I can tell them apart.

Just like you can tell a christian form a sinner.

I can tell self righteousness when I see it/hear it.

StillStanding · #**280** 08-15-2007, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aquestioninggirl

A lot of times stars get to wear a dress and get paid from designers to wear the dress....maybe this way the case...maybe she used that money to attend Youth Congress!