Twitter-TF Tenney at Jentezn Franklin's 2morrow! - Page 27

Jeffrey · #**261** 04-22-2010, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfrog

But why did you not feel those responses answered your question? Why did you feel there needed to be more elaboration?

jfrog. Seriously? I typed enough on this thread to drive you all mad including myself. Should I re-state what I've already put down.

They didn't answer my question. I explained why I didn't think they did.
The same reason "because I said so" is not a satisfactory answer. Did JT feel what he was doing was inappropriate? What social construct guided that? What is plagiarism to JT? Let's define it. I could never learn that. All I got is "I gave you my answer, now don't try to "trick me."

jfrog · #**262** 04-22-2010, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

1) "JF is accused of sermon stealing and plagiarism."

response: "people that get upset with sermon stealing our proud."
"there's nothing wrong with sermon stealing and I don't call any of it plagiarism."

2) Let's step away from the claims against JF then and talk about plagiarism in the pulpit.
response: Why are you accusing JF still?

3) I'm not. Now we are talking about plagiarism as a topic in general.
response: I don't have a problem with it.

4) Let's attempt to define it. Enter: Webster dictionary, legal dictionary.
response: My opinion trumps that. And when you ask me why I say, "well that's my opinion. Have your own." And then get upset of course when someone wants to engage such lame responses.

There you go giving me the same response again, will you please elaborate some more as to why those responses JT gave didn't answer your question?

Jeffrey · #**263** 04-22-2010, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeenThinkin

Okay! But I was just kidding! Can't you take a joke?

Been Thinkin

sure

jfrog · #**264** 04-22-2010, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

jfrog. Seriously? I typed enough on this thread to drive you all mad including myself. Should I re-state what I've already put down.

They didn't answer my question. I explained why I didn't think they did.
The same reason "because I said so" is not a satisfactory answer. Did JT feel what he was doing was inappropriate? What social construct guided that? What is plagiarism to JT? Let's define it. I could never learn that. All I got is "I gave you my answer, now don't try to "trick me."

No, you are just saying he didn't answer it because "I said so", will you please actually answer my question please.

Jeffrey · #**265** 04-22-2010, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfrog

There you go giving me the same response again, will you please elaborate some more as to why those responses JT gave didn't answer your question?

I see. You're trying to prove a point.

Was my response too generic for you? Or have we now gone to the point of just playing games?

I'm happy to elaborate otherwise. I don't feel you are tricking me. I will, with much candor, articulate and express WHY

Jack Shephard · #**266** 04-22-2010, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

I've attempted an explanation of that numerous times.

Why did you feel it necessary to tell a friend you are preaching his message?
"Because he's my friend."

That's not the real "reason." Being a friend is only part of it. We don't feel obligated to tell friends random things. He felt preaching the friend's sermon would have been strange maybe? Inappropriate? Maybe he had a good reason why -- but that's where I'm going. Asking him to elaborate.

That's about the same response as "because I said so." Forgive me for following up to that.

You say that you were trying to get to the heart of my answer, right? The heart of my answer is exactly what I told you. There was nothing deeper to my answer. I don't see how you can't see that. Like Sam said 'asked and answered' I can't give anymore elaboration where there is nothing to give. Honestly if there was more to give I would have given it.

Jeffrey · #**267** 04-22-2010, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfrog

No, you are just saying he didn't answer it because "I said so", will you please actually answer my question please.

Cute and witty. But not nearly the same situation. I have about 8 silly pages on this. Not just "I said so."

BeenThinkin · #**268** 04-22-2010, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

sure

That's the kindest thing you've said lately! j/k (JUST KIDDING) I'm thru kidding, and I'm sure you're glad!

Been Thinkin

jfrog · #**269** 04-22-2010, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

I see. You're trying to prove a point.

Was my response too generic for you? Or have we now gone to the point of just playing games?

I'm happy to elaborate otherwise. I don't feel you are tricking me. I will, with much candor, articulate and express WHY

I am just doing to you what you have been doing to JT. I can keep this up all night

(Its more of a game at this point, I was never serious with my questions to you tonight, it was to prove the point that anyone can keep claiming that a response isn't adaquate.)

Jeffrey · #**270** 04-22-2010, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK

You say that you were trying to get to the heart of my answer, right? The heart of my answer is exactly what I told you. There was nothing deeper to my answer. I don't see how you can't see that. Like Sam said 'asked and answered' I can't give anymore elaboration where there is nothing to give. Honestly if there was more to give I would have given it.

Do you honestly think I'm conspiring against you, JT? I mean, seriously?

You didn't give it. You accused me of trying to trip you up.

JT, define plagiarism for me.