Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
Aquila, thanks for ignoring everything I wrote. Yes the Russians hacked us along with many other major governments. So why the focus on the Russians instead of everyone else?
|
He's a democrat, following their tired old standard talking points.
Apparently, some folks connected with the US intel community believe it was some one or some several at NSA who leaked the emails.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fo...rticle/2598282
http://www.newsmax.com/AndrewNapolit.../04/id/742111/
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/...nc-really.html
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/...on-emails.html
From the last link:
"Today, the NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousand NSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency and the NSA’s best-ever analyst and code-breaker, who mapped out the Soviet command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (“in the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Union’s command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons”) – told Washington’s Blog:
My vote all along has been on an insider passing all these emails to Wikileaks.
If it were the Russians, NSA would have a trace route to them and not equivocate on who did it. It’s like using “Trace Route” to map the path of all the packets on the network. In the program Treasuremap NSA has hundreds of trace route programs embedded in switches in Europe and hundreds more around the world. So, this set-up should have detected where the packets went and when they went there."