Greta on Trump "assault". (L) - Page 2

n david · #11 03-30-2016, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

There are tricks that can bypass the layer process. I know since I have used Photoshop since its early beginning I became quite good with it at my job.

And yet, I would bet there are programs which could show what has been added to an original picture. It doesn't matter how good one is with Photoshop.

Also, we're talking about a reporter, not a graphic designer. Again, should be pretty easy for experts to know whether or not the picture was altered.

FlamingZword · #12 03-30-2016, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

And yet, I would bet there are programs which could show what has been added to an original picture. It doesn't matter how good one is with Photoshop.

Also, we're talking about a reporter, not a graphic designer. Again, should be pretty easy for experts to know whether or not the picture was altered.

pictures really mean nothing for all we know the picture might be of another person or even if its from the real person and it has not been Photoshop, there are many ways dismiss the evidence of a picture or reinterpret the picture.

n david · #13 03-30-2016, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

pictures really mean nothing for all we know the picture might be of another person or even if its from the real person and it has not been Photoshop, there are many ways dismiss the evidence of a picture or reinterpret the picture.

Dismiss the picture and you still have A) a witness from the Washington Post (along with audio of the incident), and B) video showing Corey grabbing at her.

There's plenty to prove simple battery occurred.

FlamingZword · #14 03-30-2016, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

Dismiss the picture and you still have A) a witness from the Washington Post (along with audio of the incident), and B) video showing Corey grabbing at her.

There's plenty to prove simple battery occurred.

The only thing simple in here is that there was no battery.

the witness does not mean a thing, since the witness was not there right next to her looking at her arm. the place was too crowded with lots of things going on. the witness was simply influenced by her story and could have imagined the whole incident.

I seen the video and nothing is there just a gentle but firm removal of a busybody from obstructing the path of the candidate.

you are seeing more than is there, please get an eye examination.
or stop letting your imagination go wild.

n david · #15 03-30-2016, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

""Despite Donald Trump's insistence that it's a flimsy case, the battery charge against his campaign manager is straightforward for Florida prosecutors, according to independent attorneys and a reading of state statute.

The strength of the allegations against Corey Lewandowski revolve around multiple factors that most simple battery cases don't have: video, audio and eye-witness evidence that indicates he grabbed reporter Michelle Fields by the arm and yanked her out of Trump's way without her permission.""

""The wording of Florida statute,..784.03 (1) (a) (1), cited by the Jupiter police officer who charged Lewandowski on Tuesday, is also broad and clear when it comes to the charge: "The offense of battery occurs when a person... Actually and intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other."

For veteran defense attorney Elizabeth L. Parker, the letter of the law and the wealth of evidence against Lewandowski make this a tough case for him to defend if prosecutors decide to pursue it.

"You have the most corroborating evidence I've seen in a battery case in a long time," said Parker, who supervised battery cases from 2003-2011 as a prosecutor in Palm Beach County, where the incident occurred.

"It's not often you get a crime caught on tape. Most battery cases are he-said, she-said. And the police come and the police make a determination. And prosecutors look to see if there's any corroborating evidence. Are there any injuries? Any independent witnesses? - things like that," Parker said. "And here we have all of that.... Again, it's very rare, and it's a very prosecutable case."""

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...assault-221353

Bump

FlamingZword · #16 03-30-2016, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

Bump

Nothing here people, move on.

n david · #17 03-30-2016, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

The only thing simple in here is that there was no battery.

the witness does not mean a thing, since the witness was not there right next to her looking at her arm. the place was too crowded with lots of things going on. the witness was simply influenced by her story and could have imagined the whole incident.

I seen the video and nothing is there just a gentle but firm removal of a busybody from obstructing the path of the candidate.

you are seeing more than is there, please get an eye examination.
or stop letting your imagination go wild.

Not going to argue with you anymore.

You claim to have seen the video, then you claim she was obstructing Trump's path.

That is not what the video clearly shows.

Then you discount the witness and claim the witness wasn't right there and was only influenced by her account.

Yet the audio proves otherwise.

I'm not going to make this personal as you just did, nor will I allow you to try to drag me into an argument.

Corey has been charged by the police and will have his day in court to proclaim his innocence and refute the charges.

Good day.

FlamingZword · #18 03-30-2016, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

Not going to argue with you anymore.

You claim to have seen the video, then you claim she was obstructing Trump's path.

That is not what the video clearly shows.

Then you discount the witness and claim the witness wasn't right there and was only influenced by her account.

Yet the audio proves otherwise.

I'm not going to make this personal as you just did, nor will I allow you to try to drag me into an argument.

Corey has been charged by the police and will have his day in court to proclaim his innocence and refute the charges.

Good day.

Are we watching the same video?

aegsm76 · #19 03-30-2016, 05:17 PM

The video is fairly inconclusive, to me.
However, I am not taking the time to slow it down and enhance it, either.
I think Piers Morgan made sense when he said that if it was a male reporter he would have been laughed at.

FlamingZword · #20 03-30-2016, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aegsm76

The video is fairly inconclusive, to me.
However, I am not taking the time to slow it down and enhance it, either.
I think Piers Morgan made sense when he said that if it was a male reporter he would have been laughed at.

Exactly, where are the feminazis that scream loud that they want to be treated like men are treated?