Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 05-11-2009, 09:30 PM
Bowas's Avatar
Bowas Bowas is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,318
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossfire View Post
I am in the Bible, sir, and not in Josephus' corrupted historical accounts. I studied preterism and other such false doctrines, and know what preterists believe. I even have a copy of Smith's book on my desk beside me as we speak. The truth is, your interpretation of scripture is Gnostic. This is why it is not even closely resembled of Apostolic theology.

You have changed the second coming to a local event, instead of a global one. You pervert the resurrection. You deny the second coming as Jesus said, as well as the Apostles through the scripture.

I would advise you to cease studying Gill, Mauro, and other trinitarians, and start studying the Bible for yourself, repenting of being led astray into such false doctrine.
Curious, just curious. Do any trinitarians teach and espouse the same views as you do? I would guess, yes. And chances are, the entire basis of your endtime views probably was originaly devised and promoted by trinitarians. I do not even know what your particular brand is, but i am sure there are many trinitarians the teach it exactly as you do. Oh, most oneness that hold to trinitarian teachings, just don't believe the trinitarians will be saved, but other than that, they are right.
Discalimer: I am just making an assumption of your views.
Regarless of who believes a particular view point or not, does not necesarrily determine weather it is valid or not.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 05-11-2009, 09:39 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Is Crossfire the same person as William Price? If so, bro., you know better than to say we are gnostic. Whoever it is, it is someone associated with Gary Reckart, by the term "gnostic" repeated all the time. And if so, you have changed beliefs from preterism to post trib so many times we cannot keep count any more. If you are WP, I always advised you to stay away from prophecy due to your inability to stay in one belief system for a very long time. Still love you, though. If you are not WP, sorry. But you obviously know GR.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 05-11-2009, 09:59 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Crossfire: Read this: http://apostolicfriendsforum.com/sho...4&postcount=94

How does one go from DEAD WRONG to calling it truth?

You know GR's spirit is harsh and wrong. Bro., get involved with some good hearted brethren who are right in their attitude as well as strong about their beliefs. Nothing condones such a harsh attitude as what GR portrays, and you manifest the same thing on this thread. Don't stay there, bro.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:29 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Quote:
Originally Posted by shag View Post
jason and crossfire even have posted on this thread, they believe the ad 70 event was God's wrath/judgement, but not you Elder. It was just Titus and his boys/thugs. No judgement, that is your position , correct?
Yes I believe Titus and his thugs were used to judge Isreal I do not believe they are the return of Christ-the resurrection of the dead-the final judgment of the wicked.
I do not believe Titus was Jesus coming in
the clouds
Jesus coming with the angels
The Lord himself decending from Heaven with a shout
the final fulfillment of ALL Bible prophecy.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:30 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
There is a verse that mentions "rapture". 1 Thess 4:17. In the LATIN VULGATE Bible, the LATIN word for CAUGHT UP is RAPTURA or RAPTUS. We get the anglicized word RAPTURE from that Latin term. And the English word means the same thing. So although not used in an English Bible, the root word is used in the Latin version, and means the same thing in english as CAUGHT UP.
Thank you but he knows that and it doesn't mean a thing.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:31 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Quote:
Originally Posted by afp1996 View Post
It is not the word that we are talking about is missing from the Bible. It is the definion and teaching that is absent from the pages of the Word of God.
1Thess 4:13-18 is NOT in your Bible?
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:32 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
I disagree... Bro Burk said the word is missing from the bible... He brought that up... AndThe definition of rapture means exactly what rapturists claim...
G726ἁρπάζωharpazōhar-pad'-zoFrom a derivative of G138; to seize (in various applications): - catch (away, up), pluck, pull, take (by force).
So how is the meaning not in the bible if the word is used that has that meaning?It is also found in Acts 8.
Acts 8:39 KJV.. And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.
The definition is found in the word... If the term HARPADZO means to rapture, then it is in the bible if HARPADZO is there.
Again thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:34 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Quote:
Originally Posted by afp1996 View Post
The problem is not the meaning in the Bible brother, it's what you say it means.

For you to say that a physical body is changed into a physical body and then is risen into the sky is not the meaning of harpadzo.

Harpadzo means: to seize (in various applications): - catch (away, up), pluck, pull, take (by force).

In that word there is no mention of a physical body becoming immortal and flying into the sky. In fact the scripture you quoted shows not a flying of the physical body but the disappearance of said body without a change from mortal to immortal and then a reappearing of the same mortal body in another city. This same body did not live for ever but indeed died after being "raptured".

Like I said, no mention of the meaning you guys force into the scripture.
Have you NOT read 1Cor. 15????Jesus is the FIRSTFRUIT and He raised a literal body and THAT body ascended INTO Heaven. Acts 1:9-11
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:37 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
This is really getting tiring, AFP. I have rarely seen someone assume another person believes so many beliefs they simply do not believe, as I have seen with you, brother. Us "guys" do not believe what you claim, if you are talking about me. Show me -- quote me -- where I said anything similar to the term RAPTURE means BODIES CHANGING FROM ONE FORM TO ANOTHER.



Where did I say anything about HARPADZO meaning a physical body changes into a physical body? Harpadzo simply means to catch up, or seize and pluck up. I said nothing more than that.

When I said the meaning of RAPTURE in the bible is what rapturists claim it means, I was trying to say that the idea of a person seized up is in the word HARPADZO. Where did you get the idea I believe RAPTURE means to change bodies from one state to another? Please stick to what I said and not what I did not say. Brother,, we need to learn what the other means by saying something and not assume we know what someone means and make the error of misrepresenting their beliefs.

We are speaking about the meaning of "RAPTURE". "RAPTURE" simply means to seize or pluck up.

When it comes to the belief that a mortal physical body changing into an immortal physical body, I never got that from the meaning of HARPADZO. Where I get the belief of a physical mortal body changing into a physical immortal body when HARPADZO occurs is 1 Cor 15.

Since 1 Thess 4 says the dead in Christ rise and are followed by the saints who are alive and remain on earth, we find a connection in 1 Cor 15:51-52 when it mentions the same thing. Saying not everyone will physically die, but everyone will be changed is referring to dead and living saints being changed. Just as 1 Thess 4 says the dead will resurrect when HARPADZO occurs, 1 Cor 15 says the dead and living both are to be changed.

1 Cor 15:53 says something 1 Thess 4 never said. It adds the understanding that when the dead and living are raised, a change of body occurs, and involves corruption putting on incorruption, and mortality putting on immortality. Since the entire context is speaking about BODIES in 1 Cor 15, or CONTAINERS (which is what a body is if we read 2 Cor 5:4), then it is a mortal body that is CHANGED to become an immortal BODY.

Who said the term RAPTURE means BODIES CHANGING INTO OTHER SORTS OF BODIES? Not me. 1 Cor 15 simply says the change of bodies happens when harpadzo happens.



I never said it did. We get that additional idea from 1 Cor 15 focus on natural physical bodies changing into spiritual physical bodies, which you do not accept since you do not realize spiritual does not mean non-physical.



Agreed! But you again incorrectly assumed, without any evidence from my writings, that I believe "RAPTURE" means a changing of the body from one physical state to another, when in actuality I always maintained it only means to seize. I agree it only means TO SEIZE. And since 1 Cor says that the SEIZING AWAY of 1 Thess 4 of the dead and living occurs with the associated and additional experience of mortality putting on immortality, while Acts 8 simply says the seizing takes place without anything to do with mortality putting on immortality, your point of Acts 8 is moot. I never said RAPTURE means bodies change from mortal ones to immortal ones. I simply believe change of bodies taught in 1 Cor 15 is said to occur when RAPTURE also occurs.



I force nothing into scripture. I force nothing into the meaning of words. But you are forcing your assumptions of what I believe into my beliefs without warrant. You have done that several times now. Please ensure what you assume is correct before you propose it.

You are confusing the teaching of what people believe is associated with the event of the rapture and thinking they are saying the term RAPTURE itself means all of that. Why do you do that? Please get your facts straight about what others believe.
A slam dunk. Let me warn AFP Elder Blume is one of the best I have ever read on the bodily resurrection he will eat your lunch.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:38 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
I do not believe Titus was Jesus coming in
the clouds
By the way, LT Smith was accused of proposing Jesus came in clouds when Titus' army stirred dust from the roads, and he never taught nor ever believed that, or the record.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge Gently Sister Alvear Fellowship Hall 10 01-02-2009 07:31 PM
Jason Upton? Dedicated Mind Fellowship Hall 12 12-01-2008 12:01 AM
Jason crabb pittsgirl The Music Room 1 11-27-2008 12:56 AM
Judge Not Sister Alvear Fellowship Hall 53 05-26-2008 10:48 PM
Permission to Judge? Kutless Fellowship Hall 4 05-03-2007 12:27 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Praxeas

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.