Trump's Staff and Cabinet

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

I observed long ago that you cannot resist making everything about you. Your accusations of "hate" remind me of the tactics of the left. You treat everyone with rudeness and arrogance and when people push back you act like a cry baby. Dude, this is politics. This is not personal. Snap out of it.

I'm not crying about it. I laughed when I saw the post. It was so blatantly obvious.

For months you've attacked any post I make, calling me ignorant, stupid, etc. Didn't matter the post, your knee jerk reaction was to post an attack.

Obviously it is personal for you, and you do despise or strongly dislike me. Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporter's reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

And you continue to ignore the question.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

I'm not crying about it. I laughed when I saw the post. It was so blatantly obvious.

For months you've attacked any post I make, calling me ignorant, stupid, etc. Didn't matter the post, your knee jerk reaction was to post an attack.

Obviously it is personal for you, and you do despise or strongly dislike me. Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporter's reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

And you continue to ignore the question.

Though the amount of time I will continue to invest in this meaningless dialog is swiftly approaching an end, I will indulge you for the moment by asking, what question is it that you I am not answering? After awhile anything of real substance gets obscured by all your emotional rants. So please so kind as to point out the specific question you would like answered.

[Originalist]

OMG! Trump meeting with the Godfather in NY! You know what that means! Trump is backing off on going after sanctuary cities!

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/12/...p-in-new-york/

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

Sigh. There's no proof Tillerson is some Russian mole or plant. Of course Tillerson had ties to Putin. As the CEO of a massive, global energy company, he likely has ties to dozens of foreign leaders.

Honestly, that part of Tillerson is the most appealing for SoS. It would be good to have someone who knows foreign leaders and is able to make deals.

What is more concerning than any alleged (unproven) dirty Russian connections would be his conflict of interest if chosen as SoS.

Exxon's deal with Russia was stopped by sanctions a couple years ago, something in which a SoS would likely be involved. He has to completely and totally separate himself from his company -- stocks, investments, everything. There cannot be any whiff of a conflict of interest as SoS.

The meeting between Trump and AlGore makes Tillerson even more interesting, since Tillerman was the one who changed Exxon's view on climate change. Tillerson believes climate change is a real, global problem which warrants action -- and even embraced the CARBON TAX as the "best potential policy solution."

He's also a big supporter of free trade, which shouldn't be a surprise, but which puts him at odds with Trump's current line of thought.

Anymore, everyone realizes that climate change is real and that we're contributing to the problem. You have a good point, I respect CEOs that have acknowledged their role in this. I think the conflict of interest on this is truly a serious issue.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Esaias

So, another Obama-Shrillery shill who doesn't like Trump.

Hmm...

Actually, I only backed Hillary to oppose Trump. I'm a Berniecrat.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Esaias

The problem is, about 75% of those who voted for him and supported him did so hoping he would "drain the swamp".

The buyer's remorse this time around is gonna be YUUUGE, and the results are gonna be historic...

Very true. Honestly, a little over half the Trump voters I know are no longer proud of their vote. I know that we on the opposing side have our issues with him, but I also feel for those who feel duped by him.

[Jito463]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Anymore, everyone realizes that climate change is real

Uh, no. No, it's not. There is no such thing as "man made climate change". How arrogant do you have to be, to believe we can affect the climate of an entire planet?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Though the amount of time I will continue to invest in this meaningless dialog is swiftly approaching an end, I will indulge you for the moment by asking, what question is it that you I am not answering? After awhile anything of real substance gets obscured by all your emotional rants.

Ohhhh, thank you so much for indulging me in my meaningless posts. [/sarcasm] I'm not worthy.

Dude, you're not indulging me. You were exposed as a blatant, two bit hack who has such a strong dislike for me that you 1) automatically attack any post I make without reading it, as proven by your question below. 2) attack and mock me for stating the same things others later post, as proven by your different response to me and Esaias regarding Trump supporter's reaction to a Romney pick.

Originally Posted by Originalist

So please so kind as to point out the specific question you would like answered.

I posted the question three times! Again, it's obvious you don't even read my posts before posting your knee jerk reaction.

Originally Posted by n david

No, you. You hate me so much that this post is just one example where I posted the same basic message as another and you attacked me while praising the other. Your bitterness and hatred won't allow you to admit I could be correct in a post. You see a post and your automatic knee jerk reaction is to dismiss, mock and attack.

Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporters reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

Originally Posted by n david

What's wrong, can't answer the question?

Quick, change the subject! Post a YouTube song!

I noticed it a while back, but this time it was completely obvious.

Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporter's reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

I don't actually expect you to clearly read my posts and respond like a normal person. It's just funny to see your bias and hackery made so obvious.

Originally Posted by n david

I'm not crying about it. I laughed when I saw the post. It was so blatantly obvious.

For months you've attacked any post I make, calling me ignorant, stupid, etc. Didn't matter the post, your knee jerk reaction was to post an attack.

Obviously it is personal for you, and you do despise or strongly dislike me. Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporter's reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

And you continue to ignore the question.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

Ohhhh, thank you so much for indulging me in my meaningless posts. [/sarcasm] I'm not worthy.

Dude, you're not indulging me. You were exposed as a blatant, two bit hack who has such a strong dislike for me that you 1) automatically attack any post I make without reading it, as proven by your question below. 2) attack and mock me for stating the same things others later post, as proven by your different response to me and Esaias regarding Trump supporter's reaction to a Romney pick.


I posted the question three times! Again, it's obvious you don't even read my posts before posting your knee jerk reaction.

Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporters reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

THAT is the question you want answered? Sorry, but I don't help delusional people continue in their delusion. Your question is based on a false premise and narrative. Nobody hates you. I thought there had been a question relevant to Trump that I had missed. Moving along.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

THAT is the question you want answered? Sorry, but I don't help delusional people continue in their delusion. Your question is based on a false premise and narrative. Nobody hates you. I thought there had been a question relevant to Trump that I had missed. Moving along.

Keep moving, 0. Run away. You don't have an answer for the question because you know I'm right. Again, you're proving my point with your post. Your arrogance and extreme dislike for me continues to keep you from agreeing with anything I say, or acknowledging any wrong.

Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporter's reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

No false premise or narrative. You just don't want to admit your bias and dislike for me.