PROOF that Barack Obama was/is a Socialist??

[Digging4Truth]

Originally Posted by TRFrance

Ron Paul?
Please.

His racist past alone disqualifies him.

TUESDAY, JAN. 8, 2008 17:35 EST
Ron Paul, racist?

Ever since Texas Rep. Ron Paul first became a known figure in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, there has been discussion about his alleged ties to white supremacists and conspiracy theorists. For the most part, Paul's supporters have been able to dismiss the allegations and what evidence had emerged to support them. Now, though, literally on the cusp of a New Hampshire primary in which Paul is expected to beat Fred Thompson and perhaps even Rudy Giuliani, the New Republic's James Kirchick is out with extensive documentation of hate-filled and paranoiac writings that -- if not penned by Paul himself -- were published under his name.

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/01/08/paul/

Ron Paul '90s newsletters rant against blacks, gays

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A series of newsletters in the name of GOP presidential hopeful Ron Paul contain several racist remarks -- including one that says order was restored to Los Angeles after the 1992 riots when blacks went "to pick up their welfare checks."

CNN recently obtained the newsletters -- written in the 1990s and one from the late 1980s -- after a report was published about their existence in The New Republic.

None of the newsletters CNN found says who wrote them, but each was published under Paul's name between his stints as a U.S. congressman from Texas.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/...ers/index.html

I would imagine you are plum tuckered out verifying what you are putting forward here. TIC... for sure....

These were taken from a newsletter that did, indeed, use Ron Pauls name but it was not used with his permission nor was he a part of this group.

So... if someone ever uses your name in an article declaring the virtues of homosexuality then we will know then that you are a flaming homosexual.

Either that... or we will know that someone used your name without your consent to put forth views that are not your own.

I would vote for the second one.

How about you?

But... be forewarned.... no matter how true the second scenario is... those who just plain out don't like you will still use it to smear your name just because it is a quick and easy mud ball to pick up and lob at you no matter how baseless the accusations might be.

It happens to Ron Paul all the time.

[Ferd]

Ron Paul is to presidential politics as Baylor is to Big 12 Football.

[MikeinAR]

Originally Posted by Ferd

Ron Paul is to presidential politics as Baylor is to Big 12 Football.

Da Baylor Bears. The gift from God to every other team in the Big 12 South. They are the Mississippi State of the SEC West.

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

I would imagine you are plum tuckered out verifying what you are putting forward here. TIC... for sure....

These were taken from a newsletter that did, indeed, use Ron Pauls name but it was not used with his permission nor was he a part of this group.

So... if someone ever uses your name in an article declaring the virtues of homosexuality then we will know then that you are a flaming homosexual.

Either that... or we will know that someone used your name without your consent to put forth views that are not your own.

I would vote for the second one.

How about you?

But... be forewarned.... no matter how true the second scenario is... those who just plain out don't like you will still use it to smear your name just because it is a quick and easy mud ball to pick up and lob at you no matter how baseless the accusations might be.

It happens to Ron Paul all the time.

A newsletter? How about A SERIES of his newsletters.

So....MULTIPLE newsletters over a period of time (from the late 80's and 1990's), but someone else snuck in there and put racist stuff under his name, and he didnt know about it.... riiiight.

And he never saw and reviewed a copy of his own newsletter during that time... riiight.

And there wasnt anyone on his staff that reviewed one of these issues of the newsletter before it went to print and noticed the bad stuff ["falsely"]being written under Ron's name..... riiight.

And even after the FIRST one was quickly found out, (the first issue this happened) there wasnt one person on Ron's staff who caught it and pointed it out to him, so they could be watchful, so that this didnt keep happening over and over and over again ..... riiight.

(sigh) Would you like some ice cubes with your Kool-Aid sir??


By the way... breaking news... OJ Simpson was seen yesterday hunting for "The Real Killer" at a golf course near you.

[Digging4Truth]

Originally Posted by TRFrance

A newsletter? How about A SERIES of his newsletters.

So....MULTIPLE newsletters over a period of time (from the late 80's and 1990's), but someone else snuck in there and put racist stuff under his name, and he didnt know about it.... riiiight.

And he never saw and reviewed a copy of his own newsletter during that time... riiight.

And there wasnt anyone on his staff that reviewed one of these issues of the newsletter before it went to print and noticed the bad stuff ["falsely"]being written under Ron's name..... riiight.

And even after the FIRST one was quickly found out, (the first issue this happened) there wasnt one person on Ron's staff who caught it and pointed it out to him, so they could be watchful, so that this didnt keep happening over and over and over again ..... riiight.

(sigh) Would you like some ice cubes with your Kool-Aid sir??


By the way... breaking news... OJ Simpson was seen yesterday hunting for "The Real Killer" at a golf course near you.

Carry on sir... You have bought into this load of misinformation.

This misinformation is your candy stick so enjoy the flavor of your misinformation and the flavor of the next presidency that will be hoisted upon a nation who doesn't know any better.

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Carry on sir... You have bought into this load of misinformation.

This misinformation is your candy stick so enjoy the flavor of your misinformation and the flavor of the next presidency that will be hoisted upon a nation who doesn't know any better.

Misinformation?
Ok.

Lets see: You said it was "a newsletter".
I said it was a series of newsletters, multiple issues dating from the late 80's and the early 1990's.


If I am factually incorrect, then please demonstrate that to be so.

Otherwise, I think it'll be safe to conclude that perhaps you were the one who was misinformed.

Take care.