Whoa! Polygamist solution is frightening... - Page 12

Hoovie · #**111** 04-15-2008, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dizzyde

The evidence was the under age girls who were pregnant.

What she said.

They do not have the eveidence to take the men because no one has been offering up who the rapists are (the men who actually impregnated the girls) as far as I know. That is why they were questioning the women and children.

.

So if a rapist impregnates an underage girl in a community, that is just cause to detain ALL the children in the whole community (for their own protection) against their will?

We better round up every kid, from every inner city to protect them from any would-be nieghborhood pimps.

dizzyde · #**112** 04-15-2008, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover

No one has addressed my question.

It is not ME who is saying there is no evidence. I am saying IF they do have the evidence then they should be going after the criminals - not taking mammas away from their children. (unless there is evidence that implicates a mother)

I think the premise would be that since this is a compound, making it one property, when they have evidence (ie. pregnant children) of abuse, by law all children would have to be removed and checked out to see if they were OK.

*Anyone who knows differently, feel free to correct me. This is my understanding of the situation.

Praxeas · #**113** 04-15-2008, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freeatlast

Is a mother that allows her children to forced into sexual relations with men 4 times their age.....Is that mother really caring for her children??

The women there don't seem like they have a choice in the matter as far as allowing anything. It's probably more their husbands doing.

Nina · #**114** 04-15-2008, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover

No one has addressed my question.

It is not ME who is saying there is no evidence. I am saying IF they do have the evidence then they should be going after the criminals - not taking mammas away from their children. (unless there is evidence that implicates a mother)

Brother,

Did You see where the authorities took away the Mother's cell phones?

I believe there will be charges brought against some of these Mommas as well as the Daddies.

Nina

Also there were probably only 10 or so Daddies involved.
These Dads generally have 30 or 40 kids by several different women.

Sister Alvear · #**115** 04-15-2008, 04:55 PM

In communities like that the women have no voice.

RandyWayne · #**116** 04-15-2008, 04:57 PM

Just think.... ALL these women are probably under the impression that they would be in REBELLION!!!!!!!! if they spoke out against their husband/overlord.

And since REBELLION!!!! is as the sin of witchcraft..... And the husband is anointed as in "Touch not mine anointed"......

Nina · #**117** 04-15-2008, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

The women there don't seem like they have a choice in the matter as far as allowing anything. It's probably more their husbands doing.

Brother,

They actually believe they are right (about their eternal reward being determined by how many children they create to populate heaven)

And we are wrong to disallow this.

Nina

Sister Alvear · #**118** 04-15-2008, 05:01 PM

you wonder how people become involved...but it happens little by little...until there is no way out. Those that were born there think that is normal...many communities never let the children even go off the grounds...so sad.

Rico · #**119** 04-15-2008, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dizzyde

I think the premise would be that since this is a compound, making it one property, when they have evidence (ie. pregnant children) of abuse, by law all children would have to be removed and checked out to see if they were OK.

*Anyone who knows differently, feel free to correct me. This is my understanding of the situation.

If what you are saying were true, law enforcement would have the right to remove all children living in apartment complexes because of one person who gets abused. I think this whole situation is going to take a good long time to clear up in the courts.

Rico · #**120** 04-15-2008, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne

The government already does that. It's called 'health care'. If you purchase health care for yourself and you are overweight, you can be denied for that reason alone, even if you are in good health otherwise.

That's not correct. An insurance company can deny you the coverage when you apply for it, but, once the policy is issued, they can not deny claims because you have gained weight.