SEU (Southern Eastern University) updates

[drummerboy_dave]

Wow! This is totally amazing. Am I missing something here? Anderson gives out Baron's phone number without discussing with Baron the fact that someone is seeking for him (Anderson) to divulge his (Baron's) phone number? Meanwhile, Anderson can't give Baron the name of whom he gave the number to after the fact that he already did so, citing personal ethics?

This is an incredible learning opportunity.

[DAII]

Becoming more and more increasingly clear that ILEX is the only professional body which represents Legal Executives and trainee Legal Executives.

http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Legal_Executive


Waiting on their response.

Have tried Singh and two names appear ... none are Kulwant's.

http://www.ilex.org.uk/about_legal_e...directory.aspx

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by MrMasterMind

Mr Anderson,

I appreciate the PM requesting a personal conversation.

Under the circumstances I cannot see how that could possibly be fruitful.

In my opinion you have not behaved honorably in this situation.

You knew your friend KB had relayed that he was intending on filing a complaint with the DC bar and going to pursue other legal action against Baron.

With this knowledge beforehand you passed along Baron’s personal contact information. When calling Baron to let him know what you had done you refused to tell Baron exactly to whom you had given this information.

While I doubt you knew someone was going to call and pretend to be a member of the DC bar, you were not only complicit in legal action being taken you gloated about it on other forums.

Perhaps this will be a maturing moment for you, in which case perhaps we can share private communication at a future date.

But for right now, to be honest I do not trust you.

Anything you feel you have to communicate to me will be in public.

He did the same thing to me and I declined. It seems as though things don't go so well when Mr. Anderson gets someone's phone number.

[DAII]

The book entitled The English Legal System By Gary Slapper, David Kelly
on page 547

also states that only ILEX members can call themselves Legal Executives:


http://books.google.com/books?id=KKO...awyers&f=false

[DAII]

Perhaps the ILEX database needs to be updated?

http://www.ilex.org.uk/about_legal_e...directory.aspx

It would help verify and clarify this statement:

[Cindy]

Originally Posted by DAII

The book entitled The English Legal System By Gary Slapper, David Kelly
on page 547

also states that only ILEX members can call themselves Legal Executives:


http://books.google.com/books?id=KKO...awyers&f=false

So are they the equivalent of a para-legal?

[MrMasterMind]

So unless someone can come up with information to the contrary it appears that he may not even be licensed in any manner in England either?

Now that would be ironic.

[Cindy]

Originally Posted by MrMasterMind

So unless someone can come up with information to the contrary it appears that he may not even be licensed in any manner in England either?

Now that would be ironic.

Yes, I think it's a stretch to say you're an attorney or lawyer in the United States. Misrepresentation.

[MrMasterMind]

Originally Posted by Cindy

Yes, I think it's a stretch to say you're an attorney or lawyer in the United States. Misrepresentation.

To be fair maam he never claimed to be licensed here, at least not publicly.

And while starting out at what we would consider paralegal, (and do not have to go to law school,) they do a five year internship and are allowed limited practice, and do have the ability to even become partners in law firms eventually. But without the law school could never be licensed in US

However, the only way to be able to practice there you have to be a fellow in ILEX ( and according to his resume he is ) but for whatever reason they do not appear to have him listed in their database. Curiouser and curiouser.

[DAII]

Originally Posted by MrMasterMind

So unless someone can come up with information to the contrary it appears that he may not even be licensed in any manner in England either?

Now that would be ironic.

I would not say licensed in any manner ..... however if ILEX is the only governing professional body in which one can hold the title of executive lawyer it would behoove anyone who claims to be an executive lawyer to be a part of it as a fellow or even as an advocate.

Their database directory is readily available to the public.

I will remain on the side of caution until I hear something more from ILEX.

Maybe he was at one time?