|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
01-21-2010, 10:11 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 14,649
|
|
|
IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
Wow I can hardly believe it! Im watching them on the webstream from the prayer room. They were going to do a baptism so I paid close attention.
Four people so far baptized like so. In or "into" the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.....the Lord Jesus Christ. Or words very similar.
Im impressed.
http://www.ihop.org/Publisher/Articl...?ID=1000058181
|
01-21-2010, 10:45 PM
|
 |
Accepts all friends requests
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
|
|
|
Re: IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple
Wow I can hardly believe it! Im watching them on the webstream from the prayer room. They were going to do a baptism so I paid close attention.
Four people so far baptized like so. In or "into" the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.....the Lord Jesus Christ. Or words very similar.
Im impressed.
http://www.ihop.org/Publisher/Articl...?ID=1000058181 |
A lot of folks would be concerned about that being "compromise." I think it's cool that they're doing it.
Charles Fox Parham baptized " In Jesus' name into the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost" up until the "New Issue" became an issue and he appears to have dropped the " Jesus' name" part of the formula.
Do you think the IHOP practice is valid?
What would you say about a Oneness group (post-trib, of course) who wanted to meet folks like IHOP "halfway" for purposes of fellowship and added the titles to their " Jesus' name" formula?
|
01-21-2010, 10:59 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
|
|
|
Re: IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother David
A lot of folks would be concerned about that being "compromise." I think it's cool that they're doing it.
Charles Fox Parham baptized "In Jesus' name into the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost" up until the "New Issue" became an issue and he appears to have dropped the "Jesus' name" part of the formula.
Do you think the IHOP practice is valid?
What would you say about a Oneness group (post-trib, of course) who wanted to meet folks like IHOP "halfway" for purposes of fellowship and added the titles to their "Jesus' name" formula?
|
There are probably some who are such sticklers that unless in addition to being baptized "in Jesus name" you also must sing "I'm glad that I've been buried in the name of the Lord" after the fact. Unless both things are done you are STILL as lost as two boys kissing.
|
01-21-2010, 11:21 PM
|
 |
mary
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,002
|
|
|
Re: IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
Just make sure it's "Into the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost-In the name of Jesus" and not vice versa-that way the last part either clarifies or negates the first depending on stance... oh, nevermind...
I don't know how I feel about this, really. I've always heard it preached against, but I don't really see how it could be wrong. Some would say "but they don't know the power of that name" or "they don't know who Jesus really is". Hmmm... neither did I, when I was baptized. And for that matter, I doubt I truly do now. Not sure it's humanly capable to grasp everything wrapped up in that name.
__________________
What we make of the Bible will never be as great a thing as what the Bible will - if we let it - make of us.~Rich Mullins
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.~Galileo Galilei
|
01-21-2010, 11:27 PM
|
 |
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
I am good with it. Of course while I would teach baptism invoking Jesus name, I would not necessarily say all other formulas are "invalid". Baptism, after all, is a result of faith - not a means of defining our faith.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Last edited by Hoovie; 01-21-2010 at 11:31 PM.
|
01-21-2010, 11:28 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,206
|
|
|
Re: IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
Quote:
Originally Posted by missourimary
Just make sure it's "Into the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost-In the name of Jesus" and not vice versa-that way the last part either clarifies or negates the first depending on stance... oh, nevermind...
I don't know how I feel about this, really. I've always heard it preached against, but I don't really see how it could be wrong. Some would say "but they don't know the power of that name" or "they don't know who Jesus really is". Hmmm... neither did I, when I was baptized. And for that matter, I doubt I truly do now. Not sure it's humanly capable to grasp everything wrapped up in that name.
|
How about the following.... "In obedience to the command of our Lord, to go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and in the power and authority of the name of Jesus Christ I now baptize you in water this day."
BeenThinkin
__________________
"From the time you're born, 'til you ride in the hearse, there ain't nothing bad that couldn't be worse!"
LIFE: Some days you're the dog and some days you're the hydrant! 
I have ... Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia! The fear of long words.
"Prediction is very hard, especially about the future." - Yogi Berra
"I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave in reflection." - Thomas Paine
|
01-21-2010, 11:39 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 14,649
|
|
|
Re: IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother David
A lot of folks would be concerned about that being "compromise." I think it's cool that they're doing it.
Charles Fox Parham baptized "In Jesus' name into the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost" up until the "New Issue" became an issue and he appears to have dropped the "Jesus' name" part of the formula.
Do you think the IHOP practice is valid?
What would you say about a Oneness group (post-trib, of course) who wanted to meet folks like IHOP "halfway" for purposes of fellowship and added the titles to their "Jesus' name" formula?
|
I am on record on this forum as saying I believe its perfectly valid to baptize into the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost......the name of Jesus Christ.
I dont agree with the other way around. Many say in the name (or authority of) Jesus I baptize you in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.
I figured thats what the IHOP Minister would say. But no. He did it practically the same as I would have myself.
On the issue of how to baptize hats off to IHOP!
|
01-21-2010, 11:39 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
|
|
|
Re: IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
Quote:
Originally Posted by missourimary
Just make sure it's "Into the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost-In the name of Jesus" and not vice versa-that way the last part either clarifies or negates the first depending on stance... oh, nevermind...
I don't know how I feel about this, really. I've always heard it preached against, but I don't really see how it could be wrong. Some would say "but they don't know the power of that name" or "they don't know who Jesus really is". Hmmm... neither did I, when I was baptized. And for that matter, I doubt I truly do now. Not sure it's humanly capable to grasp everything wrapped up in that name.
|
Good thoughts.
I also hear endless debates about oneness and how even baptizing correctly will be negated if you do not understand one-God properly. And after hearing some of these guys debate, you'll usually walk away not knowing what one and one equals or what color the sky is.
|
01-21-2010, 11:41 PM
|
|
mary
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,002
|
|
|
Re: IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
The problem, Been Thinking, is that I have been taught for years that is a compromise, but I don't really see how it could be. I was baptized in the titles at 15, and baptized in Jesus name at 18. My first baptism actually meant more to me. When I was rebaptized, it was in obedience to what I was being taught, but it wasn't with faith that God would wash away my sins or that this was a specific act of commitment or anything-because I thoroughly believed that my baptism in the titles had been effective.
Hoovie is very right, it takes faith, but is not a means of defining our faith. I like how you put that, Hoovie. 
__________________
What we make of the Bible will never be as great a thing as what the Bible will - if we let it - make of us.~Rich Mullins
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.~Galileo Galilei
|
01-21-2010, 11:52 PM
|
|
mary
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,002
|
|
|
Re: IHOP Baptizing in Jesus Name
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne
Good thoughts.
I also hear endless debates about oneness and how even baptizing correctly will be negated if you do not understand one-God properly. And after hearing some of these guys debate, you'll usually walk away not knowing what one and one equals or what color the sky is.
|
Agreed. Part of it may be because I was growing up and began hearing more doubts as an adult, but I had more doubts about whether I was correctly baptized in Jesus name than I ever have about whether I was baptized in the titles. I've been told at various times that a believer must face a certain direction when baptized, be baptized in flowing water, and be totally immersed. (But sometimes that's easier said than done... fat floats!) And these statements really bothered me, because, after all, being Apostolic I was told I had to be baptized right! Was I? *gulp* If that preacher didn't get me all the way under, would God send me to Hell? 
So after years of struggling with it and coming to that conclusion, how can I say that "in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, which is the name of Jesus" could be incorrect?
Above that, and the question of a lifetime for me... if the disciples baptized in Jesus' name because they were following the command of Mt 28:19... and if "baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost" means baptizing in the name of Jesus, then wouldn't the opposite also be true, that when you baptize in Jesus name, you are also baptizing by the command of Mt 28:19, and therefore into the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost? If these are both logical conclusions, does it matter which statement is used, since both have the same meaning? (It's late. I hope that makes sense...)
__________________
What we make of the Bible will never be as great a thing as what the Bible will - if we let it - make of us.~Rich Mullins
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.~Galileo Galilei
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
