Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Debate Room > Private Debate
Facebook

Notices

Private Debate For One on One Debates


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-22-2009, 01:17 AM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,791
Re: The Christ of Apostolic Full Preterism?

Ok. I deleted the exchange. We have two rounds left. Remember this is part of the opening. If both are done with the opening we can move on

We have a cross examination.

I think the form we have could be modified to this

Word Limit 400
Debater 1 ask 1 question.
Debater 2 responds
Debater 1 responds
Debater 2 responds

Debater 2 asks 1 question
Debater 1 responds
Debater 2 responds
Debater 1 responds

We repeat that 3 times

After that will be concluding remarks, no word could, where you both can say what you want. Remember, others are reading and will judge the content of the debate
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-22-2009, 07:00 AM
TK Burk's Avatar
TK Burk TK Burk is offline
Lamb Saved & Shepherd Led


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,729
Re: The Christ of Apostolic Full Preterism?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
Ok. I deleted the exchange. We have two rounds left. Remember this is part of the opening. If both are done with the opening we can move on

We have a cross examination.

I think the form we have could be modified to this

Word Limit 400
Debater 1 ask 1 question.
Debater 2 responds
Debater 1 responds
Debater 2 responds

Debater 2 asks 1 question
Debater 1 responds
Debater 2 responds
Debater 1 responds

We repeat that 3 times

After that will be concluding remarks, no word could, where you both can say what you want. Remember, others are reading and will judge the content of the debate
Asking and answering ONE question at a time is MUCH better. However, the question should also be proven to be a teaching of the apostles' concerning Jesus. That is the agreed upon purpose of this thread.

I look forward to answering this type question from Bro. Anderson.
__________________
The Bible is open to those that want Truth, and if they want Truth, they find Truth. They watch individuals squabble over Bible symbolism on the Internet, and leave the Message boards to enter into the real world where live people dwell, and they find Truth. The World Wide Web is full of Internet Ayatollahs who speak their mind. There is only one Truth, and it is not hidden. No matter what anyone says, Truth still converts the sincere.
 -DD Benincasa, 12/06/03

www.tkburk.com
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-28-2009, 11:13 PM
TK Burk's Avatar
TK Burk TK Burk is offline
Lamb Saved & Shepherd Led


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,729
Re: Response One

I want to thank Bro. Anderson for his willingness to continue with this debate, and Praxaes for his patience and his involvement.




I will address Bro. Anderson's first points as concisely as possible:

Quote:
Originally Posted by JN Anderson View Post
The prophesied Messiah and the prophecy of His Second Coming are both key topics. Is there a difference in a Christ that has already come and one that has not? Is there a difference between a Christ who came spiritually and one who came physically? Is there even a difference between a God who pours His wrath only on Jerusalem and one who pours it out upon the world? Please answer those questions directly and concisely as possible.
These questions can be answered by looking at Old Testament (OT) examples of God “coming” in judgment. The OT “comings” include: (1) judgment due to following false gods and not keeping God's covenant. (2) a specific generation said to receive this judgment. (3) a heathen army acting as God's sword of vengeance. This criterion is also found in the New Testament (NT) “coming” of Jesus Christ. By comparing these OT and NT accounts, I propose that Jesus did “come again” during His generation, and did so in exactly the same manner as He did in the OT.

One of these “comings” is found in Nebuchadnezzar's conquering of Judah (see Jer 25:8-13). The Bible describes the King of Babylon as God's “servant” and as His agent of judgment (see Jer 43:10). In this account, God is described as the One bringing the judgment. He did this through Nebuchadnezzar. His judgment was to come against a specifically named generation and was done by using the Babylonian army[1]. Just like this BC586 “coming,” Jesus also pronounced judgment against a generation who followed false gods and disobeyed His covenant. Regard this generation, Jesus said He would come and destroy their city, burn their temple, and scatter their remnant throughout the known world.

We first see the warning of this “coming” when John the Baptist asked, “O GENERATION of vipers, who hath WARNED YOU TO FLEE FROM THE WRATH TO COME?” (Mat 3:7-12). Notice, “the wrath TO COME.” This would make no sense if it was for a generation 2,000 plus years later. So it is evident John was warning that generation. This warning was reiterated on the Day of Pentecost when Peter warned: “save yourselves from THIS untoward GENERATION” (Act 2:40). Peter singled out that generation as being more wicked because he knew it was the generation that would see God “coming” in judgment. Jesus also singled out this same generation as being the one to receive His coming judgment when He said, “Verily I say unto you, THIS GENERATION SHALL NOT PASS, TILL ALL THESE THINGS BE FULFILLED” (Mat 24:34). That First Century generation being the one chosen to see Jesus' coming in judgment is also found in other passages[2].

The disciples expected the same type “coming” as found in the OT. And just like those “comings” literally mentioned a certain generation, the NT believers expected the time language in this NT “coming” to be taken literally also. The Bible prophesied a three and one-half year (42 month/1260 day) siege against Jerusalem. In AD66 Roman Emperor Nero commanded the destruction of Jerusalem and her temple. Titus began this around April, AD70. This was forty years (one generation) to the week from the crucifixion of Christ. The Temple was burnt August 10, AD70 (the Jewish Ninth of AV, which is the exact day and month on which Babylon burnt Solomon's Temple in 586 BC). The Roman army ended the Jewish resistance on September 26, AD70, thus fulfilling God's prophesied judgment.

The question now before Bro. Anderson is since the OT plainly describes an invisible God bringing judgment against Jerusalem and her temple through a heathen army[3], why would it be considered unbiblical to expect a similar “coming” in the NT? Also, since the Bible plainly prophesied the AD70 destruction of Jerusalem and her temple, can Bro. Anderson give any scriptures that say God did this any differently than as an invisible God working through a heathen army?

__________________
The Bible is open to those that want Truth, and if they want Truth, they find Truth. They watch individuals squabble over Bible symbolism on the Internet, and leave the Message boards to enter into the real world where live people dwell, and they find Truth. The World Wide Web is full of Internet Ayatollahs who speak their mind. There is only one Truth, and it is not hidden. No matter what anyone says, Truth still converts the sincere.
 -DD Benincasa, 12/06/03

www.tkburk.com

Last edited by TK Burk; 04-28-2009 at 11:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-29-2009, 02:52 AM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,791
Re: The Christ of Apostolic Full Preterism?

Not including quotes and introductory salutations 573
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Church of the Lord Jesus Christ Of the Apostolic F Praxeas Fellowship Hall 38 09-06-2010 08:12 PM
Ever heard of apostolic Church of Jesus Christ? OneRose Fellowship Hall 22 12-03-2007 10:51 PM
PARTIAL Preterism VS. FULL Preterism mfblume Deep Waters 15 07-01-2007 11:41 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.