Why Apostolic women wear veils Pt 1

[TCSQ]

Originally Posted by old friend

Heretics work really hard to convince themselves, and others naturally, but hardest to convince themselves first..it’s all downhill from there.

..howbeit the Greek is clear...her hair is given "instead of" a diaper.

Nice whirlwind of opinions and comedic commentaries though. Dime a dozen on any subject. If I had all night I too could fill 10 pages with "expert" opinions to counter. Especially in regards to your desperate plee to John 1:16, of which there are various opinions to the usage of the prepositions ANTI there.

Maybe you might consider studying harder next time.

What a hoot to watch you scramble with keyboard gymnastics to make 1 cor 11 say something it clearly doesn't, all the while acting rather foolishly. I think your reference to Monty Python both revealing and fitting for such a flying circus as yours.

I think you appear to be emotionally unstable. Are you taking any prescription medications?

Nevertheless, I have watched the Lord Jesus Christ move mightily at the behest of countless truly Apostolic women, countless times, none of which have fallen victim to the diaper donning campaign that those of your like wage with the tenacity of state hospital workers.

You see, not only does your doctrine not fly on paper, but it doesn't function either. Your veil, just like another one we read of, is immaterial....pun intended.

Oh, and I’d be very cautious of your critique of the Holy Ghost and what He chooses to do with His true daughters. He is not the author of confusion, he leaves that to the heretics.

Furthermore you are plagued with assumptions, and devoid of fact and true understanding. I also noticed you twisted scripture to try and gain a noun where it is not there. Sad...very sad.

I'd give you the benefit of the doubt and call it novice, as the tones of your posts clearly resound, but I'm quite certain that it was intentional because diaper donners are constantly claiming nouns in that passage where they are not.

Perhaps you're simply a victim unto regurgitation, many of this fodder are.

I love to watch this kind of thing played out again and again. You were presented with three of the most respected sources of Bible commentary availablle , and were completely unable to present any actual refutation of the material.

So you resort to the typical smokescreen type dodge, lots and LOTS of meaningless verbiage to mask the fact that a differring viewpoint than yours is not only very solid, but has a great deal more weight in back of it than yours.

If Ignorance is Bliss than you must be among the most blissful of men! I salute you for your persistence and intransigence in holding to error! Your version of the typically ignorant "I've made up my mind now don't confuse me with facts" stance is one of the great catastrophes in Pentecost. It is the vehemence with which you undoubtedly pursue those who disagree with you that causes so many of our THINKING men and women to either bury their understanding of what they read and UNDERSTAND deep in the innermost parts of their being or causes them to bolt foor the door with a hearty "I GOTTA GET OUTTA THIS PLACE" Sad sad sad.
(aside to all THINKING READING Apostolics who come to a different conclusion than the kind here being ramrodded unsuccesfully down our throat....STAY! When men and women have NO grounds for their false understanding of scripturethey behave exactly as Old Friend does, but you have the ONE thing in your favour that the Old Friends of this world DON'T...TRUTH and TRUTH SHALL TRIUMPH! (sorry Old Friend but its true)

When the insulting nature of your comments to the heart felt conviction of MILLIONS of your own blood bought brethren is pointed out there is not the slightest twinge of any sense of remorse or " well maybe I could have made my point differently." in you. Nope not with your kind, you opt more for the Don Rickles approach.

So let ME opt for the Shecky Green approach in closing.

Thanks for the insight from Crabwell Corners! I'm sure it will make a great impression on the folks from Pixley, Hootersville and Bug Tussle. I DON'T think its gonna fly with the folks from Mount Pilot, Mayberry and Gilligans Island, THEY know how to read! Thanks for the living illustration of what it means to...

LET THE IGNORANT BE IGNORANT STILL.

[TCSQ]

Originally Posted by old friend

Heretics work really hard to convince themselves, and others naturally, but hardest to convince themselves first..it’s all downhill from there.


Perhaps you're simply a victim unto regurgitation, many of this fodder are.

P.S. Just have to LOVE the "Victim unto regurgitation" comment! You DO have a way with words, don't you? (Now if you just knew what they MEANT....)

[TCSQ]

[QUOTE=old friend;556065]


Oh, and I’d be very cautious of your critique of the Holy Ghost and what He chooses to do with His true daughters. He is not the author of confusion, he leaves that to the heretics.




My response....
I was driving down the highway and it just kind of hit me and I really have to ask. You aren't old D.C. " SMART PEOPLE DON'T KNOW GOD !" Moody are you?

Your strong implication that the millions of Apostolic women around the world who have a different opinion on this practice than your interpretation aren't TRUE daughters of the Lord Jesus Christ is kind of scary from the perspective of impugning their paternity, don't you think? Or does obeying Acts 2:38 NOT represent the new birth ?

Over all if I were you I would step back and have a diet coke and ask myself what it is in your economy that has placed YOU in the position of labelling your fellow brethren the children of God heretics and evidently NOT of the household of faith because they have a difference of opinion with you on this point.