Interesting Article from a Conservative Apostolic - Page 42

Monkeyman · #**411** 07-19-2008, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Good post.

I don't agree, there have been MANY in the UPC ranks teaching on holiness for years...he doesn't get a pass on that comment...their comments while they shouldn't have been posted here IMO, were extremely RUDE!

RandyWayne · #**412** 07-19-2008, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Good post.

It does help to see the big picture in all things. I didn't know ANY of the names mentioned and only considered the blog an entertaining read as a result -knowing that there was probably much more to the thread.
Imagine a typical thread here of 20+ pages (lets say it is about 'magic hair') and having someone post it on another forum where the one or two people who believe in it are the only ones quoted? How would that make the entire AFF look to outsiders?
I don't think the thread on SG was that lopsided either way, but anyone can make anything appear anyways they want to when they control the information.

Steve Epley · #**413** 07-19-2008, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Thank you Happy Pastor2 for taking the time to post.

It does always help to hear the other side and I am glad to hear that the posters attacking SG were questioned.

They certainly were he was defended vigorously. I neither attacked him nor defended him I do not know him. However his sister came to his defence here.

Which I think is commendable.

Ron · #**414** 07-19-2008, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monkeyman

I don't agree, there have been MANY in the UPC ranks teaching on holiness for years...he doesn't get a pass on that comment...their comments while they shouldn't have been posted here IMO, were extremely RUDE!

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

It does help to see the big picture in all things. I didn't know ANY of the names mentioned and only considered the blog an entertaining read as a result -knowing that there was probably much more to the thread.
Imagine a typical thread here of 20+ pages (lets say it is about 'magic hair') and having someone post it on another forum where the one or two people who believe in it are the only ones quoted? How would that make the entire AFF look to outsiders?
I don't think the thread on SG was that lopsided either way, but anyone can make anything appear anyways they want to when they control the information.

All I was commenting on was his clearing the air as he was there when the posts were mad.
I am, nor have I ever been a member of CAF.

It was a good post in that he helped clear the air on a lot of stuff that was flying around that, according to the rules, should never have gone beyond
those parameters of discussion.

rgcraig · #**415** 07-19-2008, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

They certainly were he was defended vigorously. I neither attacked him nor defended him I do not know him. However his sister came to his defence here.

Which I think is commendable.

As others have said, there is always the other side, however the things that were said about him were extremely rude and it's sad to see minister's doing that to others.

However, when you take in to count that THEY feel he is on the slipperly slope and they are only defending what THEY think is right, then you can try and understand.

#**416** 07-19-2008, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Good post.

Awesome post!!! Thank you for taking the time to do it.

#**417** 07-19-2008, 04:56 PM

ooops...good post HappyPastor2....your posts are good too Ron...)

Pressing-On · #**418** 07-19-2008, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Really? I said I thought it was straightened out now. It appears that they finally do believe you that you aren't Sassy, hence my remark in pm.

On the thread as I read more that you wanted an apology from them it just struck me odd that you did that after what you said to Daniel yesterday. I still don't really see any difference in that.

The further I read it did seem that you were just messing with PP asking for an apology, but at first it seemed pretty real.

You don't see the difference? Let's look at it then.

Incidentally, DA and PP and I have moved on. I do this for your benefit alone or rather mine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Press on, Sassy. Press on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Look PO, why are you hiding behind the nick Sassy?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I hope you are kidding, PP. I'm not a coward by any means and am generally a nice person. If I have something to say to someone, I say it to their face.

I think posting to each other is the best, "to your face" we can do, as we live so far apart.

Don't accuse me of things without verifying with Admin, Okay?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

That's not a denial.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Are you calling me a liar?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

No ... just pointing out the facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Could you verify your meaning, please? I may be misunderstanding you? Before I blow your head off, are you saying that I am posting as "Sassy" also?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Yeshua loves the little children?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Answer my question, you little Frijole?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Anyone ever see Sybil?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

LOL! DANIEL STOP IT!!!!! I AM NOT SASSY OR SYBIL!!!! KNOTHEAD!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

1 out of 2 ain't bad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Daniel and PP owe me an apology! I'm waiting!!

NOW, on the other thread. The Author to the link says his name is Daniel. I didn't badger him about it or press him as though he was a liar. Big difference, IMO.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Ummmm....

Author: Daniel

The originator of this petition hopes to reach 1,000 signatures. As of now, 3:40 PM Eastern Time, five people have signed the petition, with one signing anonymously.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

NOT

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

LOL! Daniel! Go look at the link again. It says: Author: Daniel!!

revrandy · #**419** 07-19-2008, 05:04 PM

HappyPastor were the men who posted the negative banned from said Forum?

also I think it shows that what people say on a closed, open or whatever forum can come back to bite them... Words mean things...

rgcraig · #**420** 07-19-2008, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

You don't see the difference? Let's look at it then.

Incidentally, DA and PP and I have moved on. I do this for your benefit alone or rather mine.

NOW, on the other thread. The Author to the link says his name is Daniel. I didn't badger him about it or press him as though he was a liar. Big difference, IMO.

Only difference is you guys went on longer than you and Daniel did (and you were going to knock his head off and Daniel just denied and dropped it).

Nope, don't see any difference at all.