More on Skirts - Page 86

FlamingZword · #**851** 05-23-2017, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pliny

It is clear that all Aquila wants to do is argue. He cannot refute the fact that Godly men wore pants and Godly women did not. So he launches into fallacy after fallacy while simultaneously ignoring the basic and fundamental fact mentioned above.

He is welcome to continue to let his wife wear the pants in his family...

In the Bible Godly men wore robes and Godly women wore robes. End of story.

the exceptions of the priesthood does not apply to all Godly men.

There were not true "pants" in biblical times, therefore Deut 22:5 can not possible refer to something that did no existed.

FlamingZword · #**852** 05-23-2017, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aquila

By the conservative logic, pantyhose is an abomination. They were originally worn by men and the are bifurcated.

Defend the use of pantyhose.

Come on Aquila, they will simply ignore the pantyhose issue, it does not fit in with their legalistic logic.

They will never answer this because they know you are right.

FlamingZword · #**853** 05-23-2017, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amanah

this is off topic kind of, but I have never felt the move of the Holy Ghost as described below, in a church that doesn't have the consecration to have standards, along with prayer fasting, anointed preaching, ect.

How many churches have you visited?

Esaias · #**854** 05-23-2017, 11:35 PM

Can you identify the males, and the females, in the following image?

Esaias · #**855** 05-23-2017, 11:36 PM

Do liberals have trouble figuring out which bathroom to use if this is all they see?

Esaias · #**856** 05-23-2017, 11:39 PM

Is this the product of conservative values? Or liberal "progress"?

Esaias · #**857** 05-23-2017, 11:43 PM

A crossdresser wants to know: "This an old argument among male to female crossdressers. Why can women dress in clothes that are considered feminine or masculine, whereas men can only dress in clothes deemed masculine?"