More on Skirts

[Aquila]

You only have two faulty examples (a boxer-like inner garment and three pairs of Babylonian trousers) separated by a thousand years, worn in two different cultures, and you act like it's overwhelming evidence that the average Israelite male wore Levis. Typical legalist.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Aquila

You're an idiot. Canaanite custom was ritual cross dressing. In Babylon, and Persia by the way, pants were just customary attire. No ritual cross dressing involved.

Madras? Earth to Madras?

Oh, I guess being nicer than Jesus only works one way.

Hey, Aquila, I also read something about you referring to the Addams Family? Who did you say looked like the Addams Family?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Madras? Earth to Madras?

Oh, I guess being nicer than Jesus only works one way.

Hey, Aquila, I also read something about you referring to the Addams Family? Who did you say looked like the Addams Family?

Oh, get some thick skin. Go back and read all the insults hurled at me. I think a statement is idiotic and make an Adams Family joke, and y'all loose your minds. Don't be such a snowflake. Lighten up. Lol

[Aquila]

I thought we were just a bunch of guys chiding eachother and having fun. But let me be the first to apologize if I hurt anyone's feelings.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Oh, get some thick skin. Go back and read all the insults hurled at me. I think a statement is idiotic and make an Adams Family joke, and y'all loose your minds. Don't be such a snowflake. Lighten up. Lol

Trust me, I'm not upset. Just pointing out the hypocrisy. I've read the thread. Don't recall you being called an idiot, though.

And just who did you say looked like Addams Family, again?

I know you weren't talking about anyone's wife or children, right? Right?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Aquila

I thought we were just a bunch of guys chiding eachother and having fun. But let me be the first to apologize if I hurt anyone's feelings.

I was actually posting more for Mr PuppyDog than you. But back to the point:

If there are no examples in the Bible of women wearing pants, then how does that lead to "pants can be worn by women" while believing the Bible is authoritative for Christian living?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Trust me, I'm not upset. Just pointing out the hypocrisy. I've read the thread. Don't recall you being called an idiot, though.

And just who did you say looked like Addams Family, again?

I know you weren't talking about anyone's wife or children, right? Right?

Let's bury it before I incriminate myself any more. Lol

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Esaias

I was actually posting more for Mr PuppyDog than you. But back to the point:

If there are no examples in the Bible of women wearing pants, then how does that lead to "pants can be worn by women" while believing the Bible is authoritative for Christian living?

First, we're not under the Law. The Law is an all or nothing proposition.

Second, it says, "pertaineth to a man" vs. ""pertaineth to a woman". I'm Scottish. Kilts pertain to a man, even though some could argue style and design is too similar to that of a skirt. Ladies Jordache, with the pretty little punk sequins on the butt, pertains to a woman, even if the design is similar to men's pants.

Men don't wear ladies jeans. Why? We inherently know they belong to a woman.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Aquila

First, we're not under the Law. The Law is an all or nothing proposition.

What does that mean? Does that mean women can indeed wear that which pertains to a man, and that men can indeed wear a woman's garment? Is that what you are saying?

Second, it says, "pertaineth to a man" vs. ""pertaineth to a woman". I'm Scottish. Kilts pertain to a man, even though some could argue style and design is too similar to that of a skirt. Ladies Jordache, with the pretty little punk sequins on the butt, pertains to a woman, even if the design is similar to men's pants.

Men don't wear ladies jeans. Why? We inherently know they belong to a woman.

Who decides what pertains to a man or a woman? They now make rompers for men, called a "romphim". They also make pantyhose for men now, dresses and nightgowns even, all for men.

Are those things that "pertain to a man"?

If surrounding culture alone dictates these things, how can culture ever be wrong? Can it? Is culture always right?

Have you tried telling the trans crowd "men don't wear ladies jeans because they know they belong to a woman"? There is a whole generation being taught (by liberal democrats) that NOTHING "belongs" to any gender, gender is a social construct developed by evil white Christian men to keep everyone enslaved. What message do you have for these people?

[madras]

Originally Posted by Aquila

You're an idiot. Canaanite custom was ritual cross dressing. In Babylon, and Persia by the way, pants were just customary attire. No ritual cross dressing involved.

Would Jesus call her an idiot? I think not.