Lee Stoneking Addresses UN

[shazeep]

...intimating that all Muslims are by definition earless. ok
the Qur'an plainly states that one must follow Christ's example...even if most Christians do not. See how it may be viewed that without the WIIs of the world to comment, this would quickly become a mutual admiration club, cheering on their majic-hair guy at the tower of babbel. Stoneking might surely have the best of intentions, but he is famous for his exaggeration.

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by Barb

BUT it's not just the UN session you are spouting about. Caves and wives. Why does all of that matter to YOU?
The topic at the UN...Jesus Is the Answer For the World Today, is relevant to those who have an ear to hear.

As this does not apply to YOU, what does all of this matter to YOU

Why does what I say matter to you?

Since you asked though I believe I will decline to answer and instead let you figure out for yourself (if you can make that incredible leap) what the connection is between the self-serving speech to the empty seats at the UN (NOT) discussing "means of promoting tolerance and reconciliation" and the caves and wives.

Ready set go.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Barb

BUT it's not just the UN session you are spouting about. Caves and wives. Why does all of that matter to YOU?
The topic at the UN...Jesus Is the Answer For the World Today, is relevant to those who have an ear to hear.

As this does not apply to YOU, what does all of this matter to YOU

Our resident anti-Semitic poster says that he goes way back with Prax. So, in my way of thinking, Prax would be the one to vouch for his presence here. JMO.

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by Thinker

Barb
This WALKS_IN_ISLAM guy is a joke... He's been lying on this page the whole thread and will not address his lies!!

** He lied about saying it was a figure of speech about Wilson having a Lincoln
** He lied by posting Wilson doesn't pay out of his pocket to rent the Chapel, his sheeple do. He also said Wilson didn't pay for the chapel, the Methodists did because they built it, operate it, maintain it, and own it. He also said unlike the Methodists (and the UN), neither Wilson nor LS would pay a cent to provide anything to any other denomination to share their beliefs
** He posted incorrect pictures of the General Assembly (but later retracted and posted new ones with an even bigger crowd) in attempts to deceive about the crowd (which is what he has accused Wilson of) He did the very same thing when he posted the actual crowd on the actual day of the actual speech with a handful of people in attendance. Proving those things can happen and that a person can actually address the empty seats in the General Assembly without any General Assembly meeting actually happening during the speech. then provided no other explanation.
** He lied by posting it was not a General Assembly meeting because the General Assembly wasn't actually there at the meeting
** He lied by saying Other Apostolic's have spoke at a General Assembly and Stoneking wasn't the first -- which was proved a lie when the other guy they thought spoke at a GA posted the facts that he did not.. Wrong person. OOPS

He has posted no explanations or real acceptable apologies.. yet he has a right to attack others..

this all happened on just this thread!!! its no telling what other lies he's told in his twisted lives activities..

WALKS_IN-ISLAM is dirt


.

Fixed!

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Our resident anti-Semitic poster says that he goes way back with Prax. So, in my way of thinking, Prax would be the one to vouch for his presence here. JMO.

I do not personally know Prax. Don't be exaggerating.

Semitic: (adj)

relating to or denoting a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic and certain ancient languages such as Phoenician and Akkadian, constituting the main subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family.

2. relating to the peoples who speak Semitic languages, especially Hebrew and Arabic.

As the ONLY poster who lives nice and peacefully in a Semitic country your label is pretty funny. Another exaggeration?

[Pressing-On]

Our resident anti-Semitic poster has claimed he and Prax go back a long way. Was our poster lying or exaggerating?

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by shazeep

...intimating that all Muslims are by definition earless. ok
the Qur'an plainly states that one must follow Christ's example...even if most Christians do not. See how it may be viewed that without the WIIs of the world to comment, this would quickly become a mutual admiration club, cheering on their majic-hair guy at the tower of babbel. Stoneking might surely have the best of intentions, but he is famous for his exaggeration.

I believe in the simple explanations.

Here is a possible one: Creating and sharing a message on reconciliation and tolerance was so impossible that they got together and defaulted to fantastic self-serving tales.

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Our resident anti-Semitic poster has claimed he and Prax go back a long way. Was our poster lying or exaggerating?

Our resident preacher's wife has claimed to have her nemesis (who deservedly e-tears her threads up on regular occasions) on ignore. Was our poster lying and exaggerating?

"Going back a long way" was termed in the context of explaining that a few years ago Prax checked my IP address to verify my location and certainly my (very) first thread here, the one with 47,000 views, was mostly between Prax, Trini, and me. It was not a "friendly" check nor was it, for the most part, a "friendly" thread.

There are, sadly, few "friendly" threads here. Fewer since folks like Timmy etc left.

It was however legendary and it was, in my view, awhile (way) back. The first post SHOULD be dates-tamped to my join date, leaving the rest of you to determine if 6-7 years ago constitutes "way back" or not.

This thread is starting to meltdown, perhaps it will surpass that thread, which was exhausting.

[Pressing-On]

Our resident anti-Semitic poster should realize that in defending the faith - once delivered to the saints - it can get a little heated between those who study and understand the Word of God and those that do not study nor understand.

The Word says in I John 4:3 "And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world."

Hence, making two persons of them (God and Jesus), denying the work of God, i.e, denying that Jesus is truly God manifest in the flesh is antichrist.

[Barb]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Our resident anti-Semitic poster should realize that in defending the faith - once delivered to the saints - it can get a little heated between those who study and understand the Word of God and those that do not study nor understand.

The Word says in I John 4:3 "And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world."

Hence, making two persons of them (God and Jesus), denying the work of God, i.e, denying that Jesus is truly God manifest in the flesh is antichrist.

Amen, PO!