Lee Stoneking Addresses UN

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by n david

The muslim is like most liberals I know. When they finally figure out they can't argue facts and evidence, they try changing the initial argument.

The initial argument was made here:



And it continues til now. Again, the initial argument wasn't about the members being present, as the muslim is trying to change it to. It was about whether or not this was an official meeting of the General Assembly.

As I've proven using UN official documents and its website, this was indeed an official meeting of the 69th Session of the General Assembly.

It wasn't the General Assembly. It was their empty seats.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

Excellent point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...United_Nations

Wiki has a nice cool updated list of the UN delegates from all sorts of places.

SO: Where indeed do these (diplomats) live?

Do you know?

I know where our diplomats here live. They live.......here. LOL............

Only Link Which Matters

General Assembly Sixty-ninth session

High-level thematic debate on “Promoting Tolerance and Reconciliation: The Potential for Religion in Building Bridges of Tolerance and Reconciliation”

Opening segment: Statement by the Secretary-General of the United Nations
09:00 General Assembly Hall

Plenary meeting: Statements by religious leaders
09:10 General Assembly Hall

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

It wasn't the General Assembly. It was their empty seats.

UN Source Link

General Assembly Sixty-ninth session

High-level thematic debate on “Promoting Tolerance and Reconciliation: The Potential for Religion in Building Bridges of Tolerance and Reconciliation”

Opening segment: Statement by the Secretary-General of the United Nations
09:00 General Assembly Hall

Plenary meeting: Statements by religious leaders
09:10 General Assembly Hall

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

No, the discussion was whether it was actually a meeting (any meeting) of the General Assembly or just a handful of members. There was never any challenge to what the title of the meeting was (see page like two for what Stoneking said contrasted with what the intent of the meeting was). The issue was that there was nobody at the meeting.

Wrong again. I posted the claim from blackjohnwhite which started the whole argument. He claimed it wasn't the General Assembly. You're trying to change it to be about the members.

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by Esaias

How many views is video up to now?

Somebody once said "there is no such thing as bad advertising" or something to that effect.

The least we can do for the poor and probably nauseated by now owners of this site is make it interesting

[n david]

UN Source Link

General Assembly Sixty-ninth session

High-level thematic debate on “Promoting Tolerance and Reconciliation: The Potential for Religion in Building Bridges of Tolerance and Reconciliation”

Opening segment: Statement by the Secretary-General of the United Nations
09:00 General Assembly Hall

Plenary meeting: Statements by religious leaders
09:10 General Assembly Hall

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by n david

Wrong again. I posted the claim from blackjohnwhite which started the whole argument. He claimed it wasn't the General Assembly. You're trying to change it to be about the members.

Yeah, I also contend that to address the assembly you have to address the members.

You are claiming "web attendance". <grin> It was a two day event. Let's review footage of the PREVIOUS day.

[Thinker]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

It is my error in grabbing images that were of different UN meetings in different locations.

<grin> yes, but the next time they gather will be September. Which is the best time to "address the UN" since the UN member states will be present to be addressed.

Next you can explain the concept of "addressing the non-present"

HAHAHHA
you HYPOCRITE!!!!!!

[Esaias]

Doesn't "High Level Thematic Debate" and "Plenary Session" and all that sound a bit pretentious? The UN sure is proud of itself.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

Yeah, I also contend that to address the assembly you have to address the members.

You are claiming "web attendance". <grin> It was a two day event. Let's review footage of the PREVIOUS day.

UN Source Link

General Assembly Sixty-ninth session

High-level thematic debate on “Promoting Tolerance and Reconciliation: The Potential for Religion in Building Bridges of Tolerance and Reconciliation”

Opening segment: Statement by the Secretary-General of the United Nations
09:00 General Assembly Hall

Plenary meeting: Statements by religious leaders
09:10 General Assembly Hall