Lee Stoneking Today!

[Monterrey]

I was laughing at the way he moves, old ballet moves.

All in good fun on my end.

Really, I have no prob with the man. Wouldn't cross the street to listen to him but no problems.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Dante

When is Stoneking going to come out of the closet? He's long over due.

smh

[MawMaw]

I would just about bet my last dollar (if I was a betting woman) that you brother Stoneking haters would never say anything to his face that you say on this forum.

Shameful some of the comments on here.

[Sister Alvear]

H was a ballet dancer before he come to the Lord....

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

See this is bad. Its one thing to attack his teachings and methods but to attack him personally is another

We seem to be agreeing on a few more things these days.
I totally agree with your post.

[houston]

Originally Posted by Dante

When is Stoneking going to come out of the closet? He's long over due.

He needs to stay in there!

[Reader]

There is a gentleman in California by the name of Odeman who last year stated that LS made inappropriate advances toward him. Claimed several wrote him after this stating various things along this line about LS. A UPC minister named Gilmartin defended and supported Odeman's accusation, having corresponded with LS about it years ago and reported the matter to the UPC.

[kclee4jc]

Originally Posted by Dante

Spiteful? How? Stoneking is clearly a homosexual who refuses to admit it, because his finances and career dictate him to remain silent about his sexuality.

It's not my fault he's deceived you like he has so many others.

Clearly? If Brother Stoneking has a sin problem then it will come to light. God will bring it out. You have no room nor reason to throw around such accusations. Yes you are spiteful.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Reader

There is a gentleman in California by the name of Odeman who last year stated that LS made inappropriate advances toward him. Claimed several wrote him after this stating various things along this line about LS. A UPC minister named Gilmartin defended and supported Odeman's accusation, having corresponded with LS about it years ago and reported the matter to the UPC.

I remember the claims. Turns out he wasn't completely honest with his initial claim. 1) he wasn't a teen as he insinuated in his post; and 2) there was no sexual or physical contact. After his initial claims he refused to say exactly what LS allegedly did to him.

I would be very careful with this.

[Reader]

I am sharing only what I read. He did openly state that nothing physical happened.

I wouldn't have given it much thought had a licensed minister in the UPC not corroborated his story in the manner he did.