Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 10-25-2013, 11:28 PM
Esaias's Avatar
Esaias Esaias is offline
Unvaxxed Pureblood


 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,772
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
yea.... thats like saying the civil war was fought over states rights.
Uh, it was. The seceding states believed the federal government had overstepped its bounds, and was trampling on the rights and perogatives of the states. So they seceded. The Republicans rallied the north (somewhat) to the idea that states did not have a right to secede from the union.

The issue of slavery played a big part in all the hubbub, but the war wasn't fought 'to free the slaves', and it sure wasn't fought because Lincoln was some civil rights demigod (he wanted to end slavery so he could deport all blacks to Africa, because he believed - and stated clearly in his speeches and letters - that 'the African' simply could not and would not fit into american society in any way, shape, or form).

But as Originalist said, that's another topic.
__________________
Visit the Apostolic House Church YouTube Channel!


Biblical Worship - free pdf http://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/21/biblicalworship4/

Conditional immortality proven - https://ia800502.us.archive.org/3/it...surrection.pdf

Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 10-27-2013, 11:55 PM
thaddaeus417 thaddaeus417 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias View Post
Uh, it was. The seceding states believed the federal government had overstepped its bounds, and was trampling on the rights and perogatives of the states. So they seceded. The Republicans rallied the north (somewhat) to the idea that states did not have a right to secede from the union.

The issue of slavery played a big part in all the hubbub, but the war wasn't fought 'to free the slaves', and it sure wasn't fought because Lincoln was some civil rights demigod (he wanted to end slavery so he could deport all blacks to Africa, because he believed - and stated clearly in his speeches and letters - that 'the African' simply could not and would not fit into american society in any way, shape, or form).

But as Originalist said, that's another topic.
I always find it interesting that people offer the "States Rights" excuse for the South when the Articles of Succession are available online and clearly give the reason for leaving the Union as a move to protect slavery.
__________________
Acts 2:38
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-28-2013, 03:51 PM
Esaias's Avatar
Esaias Esaias is offline
Unvaxxed Pureblood


 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,772
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Quote:
Originally Posted by thaddaeus417 View Post
I always find it interesting that people offer the "States Rights" excuse for the South when the Articles of Succession are available online and clearly give the reason for leaving the Union as a move to protect slavery.
I always find it interesting when people refuse to see that slavery was a part of the state's right's issue. A part, not the whole.

Here's a rather milquetoast summary of the events leading up the War - http://www.civilwar.org/education/hi...tesrights.html
__________________
Visit the Apostolic House Church YouTube Channel!


Biblical Worship - free pdf http://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/21/biblicalworship4/

Conditional immortality proven - https://ia800502.us.archive.org/3/it...surrection.pdf

Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-28-2013, 10:23 PM
Blackxeas's Avatar
Blackxeas Blackxeas is offline
SAEXKCALB


 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 41
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-01-2013, 06:15 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
yea.... thats like saying the civil war was fought over states rights.

Burr left for the same reason the World Wrestling Pentecostal Assocation (WWPF) did....
I heard that Bro. Burr left because he did not get the Gen. Supt. office
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-01-2013, 06:20 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abiding Now View Post
So, G.T. Hayward, the great black hero preacher of Pentecost, was a conservative and believed and taught the "light doctrine".
Bishop Haywood taught a version of the Light Doctrine as did also S.G. Norris, F.E. Curts, and others that a person received eternal life if he/she walked in all the light received. This is from Bro. Haywood's book on the Resurrection:

The Second Resurrection.

According to the inspired word of God the resurrection of the
"blessed and Holy" is completed a thousand years before the second
resurrection. It is from this point that we are obliged to note the
difference between partakers of the two resurrections.
After the thousand years expire "the rest of the dead" (those who
did not come forth in the first resurrection) both righteous and
wicked, live again and are made to stand before God. It is then that
Jesus separates them as a shepherd divideth the sheep from the goats
according to Matt. 25:31-46.
In this resurrection is included all the righteous men of all
ages who walked in all the light that they were given. It is my candid
opinion that all heathen, Israelites, Christian professors who have
never heard the true gospel of Christ and those who die during
the millennium, walking in the light of their times will be given
eternal life at the last resurrection.
Many righteous people have died without the Holy Ghost and
the question has been asked: "Where will they come in?" They shall be
given eternal life in the last day. They shall inherit the New
Earth where life eternal reigns because "there shall be no more death.
If we desire to take part in the first resurrection we must be
filled with the same Holy Spirit that raised Jesus from the dead. It
is the church of the First-born that takes part in the first
resurrection. To enter into that Church, which is his body, we must be
baptized into it by both water and the Spirit. (See John 3:5; Rom.
6:3-5; 1 Cor. 12:12, 13; Gal. 3:26-28.
The time for the first resurrection is at hand. Are you
preparing to meet the Bridegroom? You must get oil within your vessels
and have your lamps trimmed and burning. Soon shall we hear the
midnight cry - "BEHOLD, THE BRIDEGROOM COMETH."
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-01-2013, 07:15 PM
Abiding Now's Avatar
Abiding Now Abiding Now is offline
Temporary Occupant of Earth


 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,287
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
I heard that Bro. Burr left because he did not get the Gen. Supt. office
Hey, ain't dat sumting, I heard the Prez is from Kenya.
__________________
.

Do Not Argue With Idiots, they will just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.
.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-01-2013, 07:23 PM
Abiding Now's Avatar
Abiding Now Abiding Now is offline
Temporary Occupant of Earth


 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,287
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
Bishop Haywood taught a version of the Light Doctrine as did also S.G. Norris, F.E. Curts, and others that a person received eternal life if he/she walked in all the light received. This is from Bro. Haywood's book on the Resurrection:

The Second Resurrection.

According to the inspired word of God the resurrection of the
"blessed and Holy" is completed a thousand years before the second
resurrection. It is from this point that we are obliged to note the
difference between partakers of the two resurrections.
After the thousand years expire "the rest of the dead" (those who
did not come forth in the first resurrection) both righteous and
wicked, live again and are made to stand before God
.WRONG There are no righteous at the second resurrectionIt is then that
Jesus separates them as a shepherd divideth the sheep from the goats
according to Matt. 25:31-46.
In this resurrection is included all the righteous men of all
ages who walked in all the light that they were given
. WRONG It is my candid
opinion that all heathen, Israelites, Christian professors who have
never heard the true gospel of Christ and those who die during
the millennium, walking in the light of their times will be given
eternal life at the last resurrection.
Many righteous people have died without the Holy Ghost and
the question has been asked: "Where will they come in?" They shall be
given eternal life in the last day. They shall inherit the New
Earth where life eternal reigns because "there shall be no more death.
If we desire to take part in the first resurrection we must be
filled with the same Holy Spirit that raised Jesus from the dead. It
is the church of the First-born that takes part in the first
resurrection. To enter into that Church, which is his body, we must be
baptized into it by both water and the Spirit. (See John 3:5; Rom.
6:3-5; 1 Cor. 12:12, 13; Gal. 3:26-28.
The time for the first resurrection is at hand. Are you
preparing to meet the Bridegroom? You must get oil within your vessels
and have your lamps trimmed and burning. Soon shall we hear the
midnight cry - "BEHOLD, THE BRIDEGROOM COMETH."


In this the Bishop was WRONG.

One little verse nails it shut.

Joh 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,

Joh 5:29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

Only two resurrections...
1. those that have done GOOD in the resurrection of LIFE.
2. those that done EVIL in the resurrection of DAMNATION.

If they don't make the first resurrection, the lake of fire will be their portion.
__________________
.

Do Not Argue With Idiots, they will just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.
.

Last edited by Abiding Now; 11-01-2013 at 07:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-01-2013, 07:33 PM
seekerman seekerman is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,406
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abiding Now View Post
In this the Bishop was WRONG.

One little verse nails it shut.

Joh 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,

Joh 5:29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

Only two resurrections...
1. those that have done GOOD in the resurrection of LIFE.
2. those that done EVIL in the resurrection of DAMNATION.

If they don't make the first resurrection, the lake of fire will be their portion.
Wasn't but just a short period of time before the grave dwellers heard His voice and came forth....

Mat 27:52-53 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

Some of them to the resurrection of life and some to the resurrection of damnation? I doubt any of those who were part of the first resurrection were damned though, they were identified as saints.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-01-2013, 07:40 PM
Abiding Now's Avatar
Abiding Now Abiding Now is offline
Temporary Occupant of Earth


 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,287
Re: Andrew Urshan denouncing the "new issue"

Quote:
Originally Posted by seekerman View Post
Wasn't but just a short period of time before the grave dwellers heard His voice and came forth....

Mat 27:52-53 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

Some of them to the resurrection of life and some to the resurrection of damnation? I doubt any of those who were part of the first resurrection were damned though, they were identified as saints.
Come on. You really believe that Matthew 27 is the FIRST resurrection? Surely not.
__________________
.

Do Not Argue With Idiots, they will just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.
.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Andrew Urshan and The New Birth Raven Fellowship Hall 31 01-03-2013 11:47 AM
The "Hussein" Obama issue. Dordrecht Fellowship Hall 2 07-23-2012 07:28 PM
Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue StMark Fellowship Hall 487 06-02-2008 07:16 AM
Andrew Urshan's Conversion Sam Fellowship Hall 21 01-01-2008 10:40 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.