150th Anniversary

[Esaias]

http://csa.systekproof.com/?p=2682

[RamoneWooddell]

Originally Posted by Esaias

http://csa.systekproof.com/?p=2682

Amazing isn't it.

I know of book also named "The South Was Right” by the Kennedy Brothers. I haven’t read it but I plan to get it also.

I have found that people, due to the Northern force history lessons, have the idea that if the South would have won then slavery would still be happening today. This is not logical. Yes it would have probably lasted longer than it actually did...maybe. But not forever. The fact is that most of the South freed their slaves during the war without and Executive Order from a tyrant in another country. As modern advances were created, slavery would have been done away with because the economy would not have allowed for it. What made the Confederates speak so much about Slavery and in favor of it was that other States in the Union was trying to tell them what to do in their State. They were using the Federal US Government to extend their will upon another Sovereign State. This was the problem and slavery was the breaking point. Yet this is not what is told by the US Department of Education. Why? Because they want to continue the occupation of another Country.

Don't get me wrong. I love the United States of America, something the even the Confederate States of America did, but I also love the Confederate States of America. Both have things that I do not like. Should I throw the baby out with the bath water? No. But it is not right for one government to continue to occupy another. If Canada or Mexico or China or Russia was doing the same thing as the US has done, would the same attitude be here? I am American. I am both and US Citizen and a Georgian. We should have the truth taught in our schools! Instead of a slanted idea which favors a tyrant government.

[MarcBee]

Originally Posted by RamoneWooddell

Amazing isn't it.

.... Why? Because they want to continue the occupation of another Country....Both have things that I do not like. Should I throw the baby out with the bath water? No. But it is not right for one government to continue to occupy another. If Canada or Mexico or China or Russia was doing the same thing as the US has done, would the same attitude be here?....

Okay, then, does your CSA apply the above sentiment to the claims of Native Americans? Some of them are still labeled for example, "The NATION of the Seminoles." When is the CSA going to return Florida (and Oklahoma) to them?

Get over it.

[RamoneWooddell]

Originally Posted by MarcBee

Okay, then, does your CSA apply the above sentiment to the claims of Native Americans? Some of them are still labeled for example, "The NATION of the Seminoles." When is the CSA going to return Florida (and Oklahoma) to them?

Get over it.

Actually the Confederate Territory of Oklahoma actually was to be an Indian State with representation in the Confederate Congress. Perhaps you should study history instead of propraganda!

[Luke]

Marcbee if you want to use the argument that because maps do not ago the CSS in existence today it doesn't exist then by that same argument one could say that the nation of Israel doesn't exist because in most middle eastern Curries today those maps still do not show Israel.

[Luke]

I am a proud American but still must point out the fallacy of your argument.

[Digging4Truth]

Originally Posted by RamoneWooddell

You are correct in that the UNITED STATES INC did impose an illegal authority not granted to it within the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, Northwest Ordinance, or the Constitution for the united States much less the Constitution of the Confederate States of America. This was in fact the invasion of a tyrant rogue government. Per the above documents by virtue of the declaration of the fact that each State was a State or Nation, and that they each were sovereign they could dissolve the union between themselves and any other State. It was only in the minds of Radical Republicans and a President who would not be restrained by the very document he says he sought to protect and defend.



The CSA was not in rebellion to the US, she was a separate and distinct Government. There would have been peace between the two countries if only the US had removed their Federal troops from CSA land. They were asked to leave and refused thereby being invaders. There was no rebellion on the part of the CSA. What was done to the CSA is what is repeatedly done today... the colonization of independent states and governments to make them servants to themselves.

As a side note. The Confederate States of America has been under occupation by the UNITED STATES Inc for the past 150 years. There was never a surrender of the Governments nor a peace treaty signed.

Go ahead on... Great post.

Also... in reference to the first post... the first shot was fired at Fort Sumter but the conflict didn't start there. But that isn't taught in history because it doesn't serve the narrative.

[houston]

Too long ago. No one cares. NEXT>>>

[Digging4Truth]

Originally Posted by houston

Too long ago. No one cares. NEXT>>>

That statement is so incorrect it boggles the mind.

[RamoneWooddell]

Originally Posted by houston

Too long ago. No one cares. NEXT>>>

I'm sorry? 150 years of occupation, reconstruction, and cultural genocide is not "too long ago. No one cares. NEXT". What happened was unconstitutional. That is my point. By all means support your position that no one cares. And I will do the opposite.

Or will you resort to drive-by comments that seek only to degrade others?