Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #931  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:24 PM
Encryptus Encryptus is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: "New" Mexico
Posts: 977
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne View Post
And sun glasses!
LOL
Reply With Quote
  #932  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:24 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

How about this?
Reply With Quote
  #933  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:27 PM
El Predicador El Predicador is offline
Silent No More


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 473
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Encryptus View Post
Naw Smith tried it too. It is kinda fun.
Stay out of it cryto I have it handled
Reply With Quote
  #934  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:30 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne View Post
It's there. (And I was wearing cloths.. swimming trunks.)

http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w...s/DSC02928.jpg
It helps to click on THIS link and let it start playing before clicking on the above.

http://randyandgail.com/Music/Baywatch.mp3
Reply With Quote
  #935  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:32 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo View Post
I addressed this already to Azzan. I may have a close friend who is, or at least certainly was. I also have close friends who are both fornicators and adulters, though not currently in an adulterous relationship.

God opens doors, I don't think I have ever pre-detrmined to go and tell someone they needed to get right. The doors have always opened so that I could say what was needed to say in the context of love, while still being blunt about their sin and need for repentance. And as I said, I have not lost any of theri friendships ove the years.

I explain that there are certaiin lifestyles and sins that if one continously adheres to will keep them from entering the Kingdom of God, and normally will mention 1 Corinthians 6. I also mention that I've been involved in many sins listed in that passage, and point out the "some WERE such as you" and talk about redemption. I do this NEVER in a self rightous or condemning manner, but more as a warning and appeal in love.

By asking God's help. Many times they feel like they cannot break the chain, and sometimes they flat don't want to. When I spoke to my friend about his adultery, he told me "adultery is not ALWAYS wrong, it is okay in some situations-he don't treat her right, and I do."

Sometimes the response is a very outright rejection, and sometimes a consideration of the things I am telling them. But the remedy is the only remedy that can be given, just surrender to God in repetnace.


Depends on the rejection. They can and have ranged from questions, which we discussed, to post modern relativism, to outright self justification. In any case like I said, friendships have remained intact, and all know where I stand, so I guess whatever the situation, I can say I don't have blood on my hands I have given the warning.

Rarely do they accept the message as far as an outright repenting, being baptized, etc. I don't handle it any differently than the heterosexual sinners I witness to who don't accept it. I just keep sowing the seed, I leave it to God to give the increase, and I always attempt to speak the truth in love. I NEVER give an ultimatum-If you don't repent we can no longer be friends. I never seek to break the relationship, and the only way I would ever do so, is if they suggested that they could be a Christian and remain in a sin such as homosexuality, adultery, fornication. So long as they are aware of their need for God, even if they don't seem to be responding to that need, it is my responsibility to be an ambassador of Christ to them.
The same way I handle any conversion, suggest a personal Bible study on the basics of the faith, and encourage faithful church attendance. I can't change the heart, I don't try to. I believe when someone truly repents God changes their heart, and changes their desires. Not to say they may not battle, expecially as a new convert, but God will help them. Though I really believe that God can and does completely take the desire out of their heart. I have another very close friend who was hooked on meth and done some very deplorable things, who completely surrendered to God in his jail cell and God completely 100% changed him. I was present with this gentelman after he got out of county in his first interview, with tattoos on his arms, and face, and a record that is beyond is years, he was asked "why should I hire you, how do you know you've overcome you addiction? He said "Because I'm a new creation in Christ, Jesus has taken all the desires for that stuff away from me, it doesn't even appeal to me." That's what Christ can do, thats the gospel. Not a band aid on a sinner, and a self help positive thinking emergent/relevant goobly gook. But a true life. It is the POWER of God unto salvation. And that man who glorified Christ in his interview was hired, and within less than three months has already been pomoted and received a pay increase, and not to mention is on fire for God and testifies to everyone he gets a chance of the grace of God.
Bravo!

I admire your approach and your transparency in sharing it with us.

Admittedly, I am not that much of a soul winner. God help me!
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #936  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:32 PM
Mr. Smith's Avatar
Mr. Smith Mr. Smith is offline
Best Hair on AFF


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Predicador View Post
They say imitation is the most sincere flattery in this case...

Centered and red is usually the mark of an ultracon

You seem more like a green and left justified sort of guy.

I am glad you choose not to grab the weary gay man's sign.

But I am also glad you finally see the point.

Shun the appearance of evil.

Why go to the wedding when you can mail a card?

When I can mail a card??? Is that what you would do? Wouldn't that make you a compromiser because, come on man, mailing them a card would be a sign of approval!!!
Reply With Quote
  #937  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:34 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovie View Post
Bravo!

I admire your approach. Admittedly, I am not that much of a soul winner. God help me!
My old pastor talked about this once in a sermon titles Kings and Priests. The gist is that if you are not an outright soul winner through shear boldness and personality, you STILL are by supporting those who are.
Reply With Quote
  #938  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:34 PM
Encryptus Encryptus is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: "New" Mexico
Posts: 977
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne View Post
It helps to click on THIS link and let it start playing before clicking on the above.

http://randyandgail.com/Music/Baywatch.mp3
OIC David Hasselhoff wanna be LOL
Reply With Quote
  #939  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:38 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne View Post
My old pastor talked about this once in a sermon titles Kings and Priests. The gist is that if you are not an outright soul winner through shear boldness and personality, you STILL are by supporting those who are.
I suppose. I am just being candid. It seems my life is business and family. I do look for opportunity to show Christ in and through my work, but it does seem a bit insignificant when I read a post like Jason's. ("bible studies" etc)
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #940  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:45 PM
James Griffin's Avatar
James Griffin James Griffin is offline
ultra con (at least here)


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovie View Post
I suppose. I am just being candid. It seems my life is business and family. I do look for opportunity to show Christ in and through my work, but it does seem a bit insignificant when I read a post like Jason's. ("bible studies" etc)
That is simply not true Hoovie, I will see if I can find one of my Bible studies on it.

The Levitical priesthood is no more. Now ALL Christians are Royal Priesthood.

This was unheard of. Civil war broke out among the Maccabees because one tried to be both king and high priest.

And yet we are, everyone of us.

The majority of souls saved should be in the marketplace.

Wish I had time to put more. Never feel that way about yourself.

Business is just as valid a ministry as standing behind the pulpit.

The division of clergy and laity is artificial and was created by the RCC.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DADT will still be enforced. coadie Political Talk 21 11-18-2010 04:38 PM
California AG urges court to repeal prop 8 Praxeas The Newsroom 4 12-20-2008 06:42 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.