Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


View Poll Results: Will a man go to hell for wearing a dress
Yes! Burn baby burn, burn 10 50.00%
Yes, but only to a hell reserved for cross dressers 0 0%
Maybe, Maybe not 5 25.00%
It depends on whether he knows it is a dress. 1 5.00%
Not likely, as our society evolves, it is more accepted these daze. 0 0%
No, but he will go to a heaven reserved for cross dressers 0 0%
Absolutely not, Jesus wore a dress too you know. 4 20.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-15-2007, 02:52 PM
Theophilus
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Will a man go to hell for wearing a dress?

Well, will he?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-15-2007, 02:55 PM
Ronzo
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
UGH!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-15-2007, 02:57 PM
WordPreacher
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theophilus View Post
Well, will he?
Isn't a man wearing a dress considered a cross dresser? Of course, it would send him to hell.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-15-2007, 02:57 PM
Whole Hearted Whole Hearted is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Texas
Posts: 2,065
yes
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-15-2007, 02:58 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
What about Kilts in Scotland?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-15-2007, 03:00 PM
Theophilus
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Polls up, vote away!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-15-2007, 03:04 PM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Ministerial Dress in the Pulpit
Will a woman go to hell for NOT wearing black stockings?
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-15-2007, 03:05 PM
berkeley berkeley is offline
Saved & Shaved


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 10,795
there is no option for men in cultures that wear "dress" like apparel...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-15-2007, 03:08 PM
StillStanding's Avatar
StillStanding StillStanding is offline
Beautiful are the feet......


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
What about guys who wear dresses in a comedy play?
__________________
Words: For when an emoticon just isn't enough.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-15-2007, 03:08 PM
Sheltiedad
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Dress
(1.) Materials used. The earliest and simplest an apron of fig-leaves sewed together (Gen. 3:7); then skins of animals (3:21). Elijah's dress was probably the skin of a sheep (2 Kings 1:8). The Hebrews were early acquainted with the art of weaving hair into cloth (Ex. 26:7; 35:6), which formed the sackcloth of mourners. This was the material of John the Baptist's robe (Matt. 3:4). Wool was also woven into garments (Lev. 13:47; Deut. 22:11; Ezek. 34:3; Job 31:20; Prov. 27:26). The Israelites probably learned the art of weaving linen when they were in Egypt (1 Chr. 4:21). Fine linen was used in the vestments of the high priest (Ex. 28:5), as well as by the rich (Gen. 41:42; Prov. 31:22; Luke 16:19). The use of mixed material, as wool and flax, was forbidden (Lev. 19:19; Deut. 22:11).

(2.) Colour. The prevailing colour was the natural white of the material used, which was sometimes rendered purer by the fuller's art (Ps. 104:1, 2; Isa. 63:3; Mark 9:3). The Hebrews were acquainted with the art of dyeing (Gen. 37:3, 23). Various modes of ornamentation were adopted in the process of weaving (Ex. 28:6; 26:1, 31; 35:25), and by needle-work (Judg. 5:30; Ps. 45:13). Dyed robes were imported from foreign countries, particularly from Phoenicia (Zeph. 1:8). Purple and scarlet robes were the marks of the wealthy (Luke 16:19; 2 Sam. 1:24).

(3.)
Form. The robes of men and women were not very much different in form from each other. (a) The "coat" (kethoneth), of wool, cotton, or linen, was worn by both sexes. It was a closely-fitting garment, resembling in use and form our shirt (John 19:23). It was kept close to the body by a girdle (John 21:7). A person wearing this "coat" alone was described as naked (1 Sam. 19:24; Isa. 20:2; 2 Kings 6:30; John 21:7); deprived of it he would be absolutely naked. (b) A linen cloth or wrapper (sadin) of fine linen, used somewhat as a night-shirt (Mark 14:51). It is mentioned in Judg. 14:12, 13, and rendered there "sheets." (c) An upper tunic (meil), longer than the "coat" (1 Sam. 2:19; 24:4; 28:14). In 1 Sam. 28:14 it is the mantle in which Samuel was enveloped; in 1 Sam. 24:4 it is the "robe" under which Saul slept. The disciples were forbidden to wear two "coats" (Matt. 10:10; Luke 9:3). (d) The usual outer garment consisted of a piece of woollen cloth like a Scotch plaid, either wrapped round the body or thrown over the shoulders like a shawl, with the ends hanging down in front, or it might be thrown over the head so as to conceal the face (2 Sam. 15:30; Esther 6:12). It was confined to the waist by a girdle, and the fold formed by the overlapping of the robe served as a pocket (2 Kings 4:39; Ps. 79:12; Hag. 2:12; Prov. 17:23; 21:14). Female dress. The "coat" was common to both sexes (Cant. 5:3). But peculiar to females were (1) the "veil" or "wimple," a kind of shawl (Ruth 3:15; rendered "mantle," R.V., Isa. 3:22); (2) the "mantle," also a species of shawl (Isa. 3:22); (3) a "veil," probably a light summer dress (Gen. 24:65); (4) a "stomacher," a holiday dress (Isa. 3:24). The outer garment terminated in an ample fringe or border, which concealed the feet (Isa. 47:2; Jer. 13:22). The dress of the Persians is described in Dan. 3:21. The reference to the art of sewing are few, inasmuch as the garments generally came forth from the loom ready for being worn, and all that was required in the making of clothes devolved on the women of a family (Prov. 31:22; Acts 9:39). Extravagance in dress is referred to in Jer. 4:30; Ezek. 16:10; Zeph. 1:8 (R.V., "foreign apparel"); 1 Tim. 2:9; 1 Pet. 3:3. Rending the robes was expressive of grief (Gen. 37:29, 34), fear (1 Kings 21:27), indignation (2 Kings 5:7), or despair (Judg. 11:35; Esther 4:1). Shaking the garments, or shaking the dust from off them, was a sign of renunciation (Acts 18:6); wrapping them round the head, of awe (1 Kings 19:13) or grief (2 Sam. 15:30; casting them off, of excitement (Acts 22:23); laying hold of them, of supplication (1 Sam. 15:27). In the case of travelling, the outer garments were girded up (1 Kings 18:46). They were thrown aside also when they would impede action (Mark 10:50; John 13:4; Acts 7:58).

Taken from Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What are you wearing right now! COOPER Fellowship Hall 161 02-23-2009 08:00 AM
Will a woman go to hell for NOT wearing black stockings? Subdued Fellowship Hall 51 06-13-2007 01:25 AM
What are you wearing for Easter? RevDWW Fellowship Hall 3 04-06-2007 10:55 AM
Ministerial Dress in the Pulpit secretplace Fellowship Hall 168 02-14-2007 11:57 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by coksiw

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.