Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
One can mention a private conversation, without intent to have any details of the private conversation put on blast.
|
Person A brings up the private conversation, person B doesn't respond.
Read the thread. Start at post #228 and filter the two persons.
At #236, the private conversation is brought up by person A.
#242 Person A mentions it again
#243 Person A mentions it again
#245 Person A mentions it again
Up to this point, person B hasn't responded AT ALL to any of the posts about the private conversation. Not a single word was posted about it by person B.
#245 gives even more detail of the private conversation:
"You knew my intent. You shouldn't have done that. Why would you have questioned my intent publically when you and I talked about that privately? I don't get that brother-- not at all. That offends me because publically you are trying to disparage me over something that you and I discussed privately. That's... YOU'RE A PIECE OF WORK!"
It's after this that person B finally responds with #247:
"Now since you felt the need to post the above is it alright for me to post what you posted me?"
And person B then posts his response to person A.
Had person A not gone on a rant about the private conversation ... and then given alleged details about that "private" conversation, I doubt person B would have responded.
It's only after person B is accused of something that he responds.