Donald now leads by 4

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

None of these policies would pass under Obama if the country had morals, electing leaders with morals. God would bless our nation. Yet, we are instructed to vote for the "lesser of two evils" as though one of those remaining isn't evil. You see? That has never made sense to me.

Finally a post that makes sense.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Soooooo...sound reasoning says "we know Hillary will 100% be a liberal; Donald Trump MIGHT be a liberal. We 100% know Hillary will appoint liberal justices; Trump MIGHT appoint liberal justices. So we want Hillary to win because we know what we are going to get with her. We are the party of conservatism and we are okay with a 100% chance our next president is a flaming liberal."

WHAT????

BTW, Deacon - IF the GOP and the Trump supporters were that worried about SCOTUS picks, they would have supported Ted Cruz. So, really, the feigned fear and concern - please, just stop.

[aegsm76]

po - some of us supported and voted for Cruz, but have now accepted the will of the voters and will be voting for Trump over Hillary.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by aegsm76

po - some of us supported and voted for Cruz, but have now accepted the will of the voters and will be voting for Trump over Hillary.

We don't have to support that nominee at Convention. After the field is cleared, we get to see the final candidate, in action and all alone, before we finally present that person as our nominee.

Hence, we need to allow our delegates to vote their conscience. It's the right thing to do. He is toxic and the delegates, in this particularly, unusual election year, should have that right. And, no, it wasn't the will of the Republican Party. Just a bunch of Democrat crossovers. He and his children didn't even vote in the NY Primary. Good grief.

Listen, I don't believe we should ever allow a candidate to run if he refuses to release his tax records. We need to know where our candidate has placed his money. That, after all, is where the heart is - full transparency.

[n david]

He won't release his taxes because it will prove he's lied. He's lied about his wealth and he's lied about his contributions to charity.

[Esaias]

And you know this how?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Esaias

And you know this how?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/ampht...ecb_story.html

""In recent years, the Trump Foundation’s coffers have been filled by other donors, not Trump.""

It's been noted previously that filings from recent years show Trump has less money than he boasts.

[n david]

There isn't one good reason Trump hasn't released his tax info. Not one. The only reason he refuses to do so is because info would be exposed which he does not want exposed.

[Esaias]

I though he was in the middle of an audit?

BTW, who says anyone has to show their tax returns to the general public? What - really - is a billionaire's tax return going to show?

And while we're at it, what about the US Gov's "tax return", aka CAFR and Budget? Why is nobody screaming about that? Seems far more important...

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Esaias

I though he was in the middle of an audit?

BTW, who says anyone has to show their tax returns to the general public? What - really - is a billionaire's tax return going to show?

And while we're at it, what about the US Gov's "tax return", aka CAFR and Budget? Why is nobody screaming about that? Seems far more important...

“Nothing prevents individuals from sharing their own tax information,” the IRS said in a statement.

http://thehill.com/policy/finance/27...ng-tax-returns