Brittan has a panel that decides who gets meds and who is too sick.
You think I brought that up? Or your silly implication that lower life expectancy is because of immigration (Texas, California, Arizona, and New Mexico all have higher life expectancy than your favorite state Ohio with your precious "Cleveland Clinic"). Or your silly implication that "drug use" somehow has to do with life expectancy? (Pot is legal in Alaska and the Netherlands and they both have higher life expectancies than your favorite state of Ohio with your precious "Cleveland Clinic".)
Which state DOES have a public system? Hawaii. Guess who ranks first in life expectancy? (laughing) NOT Ohio. None of your numbers add up when you apply RESULTS to them.
The above reference to a "panel" in Britain is a statement, like your death panel statement, that flat gives untrue information. Because Britain does not have restrictions on "prescription drugs" nor do many, many other countries. You can just go get them, doctor or no doctor. Better than your current system where people go without them because there is no access at all to a doctor thus no access to medications either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie
The thread is about "death panel" It is not about where you get your drugs.
|