Do You Believe In Women Preachers?

[LadyChocolate]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Israel was BACKSLID and having female rule was a rebuke to the men. Deborah had to call for a MAN to lead the armies of Israel and because he was a foolish enough to ask Deborah to go WITH him he would not gain the victory but it would be put in the hands of a girl with a tent stake.

Read the chapter well.

I did read it! I simply asked if any of you wanted to be judged by a woman! that is what I asked....... lol

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by LadyChocolate

I did read it! I simply asked if any of you wanted to be judged by a woman! that is what I asked....... lol

My mother is no longer around.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by LadyChocolate

I did read it! I simply asked if any of you wanted to be judged by a woman! that is what I asked....... lol

Hey, I am married. Enough said....

[Evang.Benincasa]

Hillary Generation is Coming?

[nwlife]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Of course it does. The same way a Trinitarian refuses to see the obvious is the same way an agenda keeper will not see the obvious on many other issues. It's as plain as rain my dear. Isaiah is talking about a backslidden Israel having the immature and females having the rule. It would have been impossible for a woman to be over a man in a teaching capacity during the first century Israel.

How can we read into Isa.3:12 that a woman won't be teaching several hundred years later? It has no bearing on if precillia actually taught or not. In this case it is grasping at straws looking for anything to say, no she didn't. it just isn't recorded what exactly she did.

But it does say acts 18:26 "And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly. "

Or was the word they, mistranslated? There is no break inbetween the actions listed. no new subject listed to do the new action of expounding (teaching)...so yes it can be infered that she did teach, along side of her husband. I don't see her doing it on her own, but I don't see her just sitting there knitting or something else either. It says THEY, so they includes precilla.

[LadyChocolate]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

My mother is no longer around.

Yeah, but your wife has control over you..... that is why you beat your chest so much here!!!! roflol

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by nwlife

How can we read into Isa.3:12 that a woman won't be teaching several hundred years later? It has no bearing on if precillia actually taught or not. In this case it is grasping at straws looking for anything to say, no she didn't. it just isn't recorded what exactly she did.

But it does say acts 18:26 "And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly. "

Or was the word they, mistranslated? There is no break inbetween the actions listed. no new subject listed to do the new action of expounding (teaching)...so yes it can be infered that she did teach, along side of her husband. I don't see her doing it on her own, but I don't see her just sitting there knitting or something else either. It says THEY, so they includes precilla.

As you said; it doesn't say she did, and it doesn't say she didn't. That means there is not enough info to make a case one way or the other. Just reread your own post.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by nwlife

How can we read into Isa.3:12 that a woman won't be teaching several hundred years later? It has no bearing on if precillia actually taught or not. In this case it is grasping at straws looking for anything to say, no she didn't. it just isn't recorded what exactly she did.

Because it sets a precedent, and therefore it shows Biblical feelings toward female government.

Originally Posted by nwlife

But it does say acts 18:26 "And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly. "

Ahh...it's a couple, the text is speaking of more than one person.

Originally Posted by nwlife

Or was the word they, mistranslated? There is not break inbetween the actions listed. no new subject listed to do the new action of expounding (teaching)...so yes it can be infered that she did teach, along side of her husband. I don't see her doing it on her own, but I don't see her just sitting there knitting or something else either. It says THEY, so they includes precilla.

The man taught the men.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by LadyChocolate

Yeah, but your wife has control over you..... that is why you beat your chest so much here!!!! roflol

My wife? Is LordChocolate your husband?

[nwlife]

But it doesn't say the men taught the men, you are only infering that.