Iran Deal A Good Deal!

[shazeep]

ok

[Bowas]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Ok. So now it is a bad deal because someone else said it was a bad deal. What is so bad about the deal?

Deal or no deal? At this point what is good about this deal? (no talking points, but actual deal points that are in fact good)

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Bowas

Deal or no deal? At this point what is good about this deal? (no talking points, but actual deal points that are in fact good)

I asked n david first, but if you like, you can respond with the skinny on what is so bad about this deal.

[shazeep]

...being as how he seems immune to a spiritual pov

[Bowas]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

I asked n david first, but if you like, you can respond with the skinny on what is so bad about this deal.

This thread was started with the claim that the deal was a good deal. I have yet to see anything other than the claim to substantiate it.

The one that supports the claim of the deal being good need show how it is in fact good.

I don't know for sure if it be good or not so good, but seems the French believe our negotiators on this deal got taken for a ride. Why? I'm unsure, but I would like to see why one thinks it be a good deal.

[shazeep]

i like it bc it appears that the sanctions--which only hurt the nation, and not the government--will be lifted. i dislike it bc it will become a lever for Rothschild intrusion into their bank, i bet.

[Bowas]

Did a little reading on if and or what the deal is or is not. Neither the USA or Iran even agree on what the "agreement" is. One (or both) sides are lying. In this particular deal, I trust neither side. If there is no agreement as to what the "deal" is, I would venture to say it is not a good deal.
All political differences aside, we cannot hope it is what "our side" may want and side with it just because.
The contradictions and disagreements between both sides make me think the deal is not a good deal.

We cannot think things are the way we wish they were.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Bowas

Did a little reading on if and or what the deal is or is not. Neither the USA or Iran even agree on what the "agreement" is. One (or both) sides are lying. In this particular deal, I trust neither side. If there is no agreement as to what the "deal" is, I would venture to say it is not a good deal.
All political differences aside, we cannot hope it is what "our side" may want and side with it just because.
The contradictions and disagreements between both sides make me think the deal is not a good deal.

We cannot think things are the way we wish they were.

Although some important issues still need to be clarified in the final agreement, President Obama should be congratulated for getting a better-than-expected framework agreement restricting Iran's nuclear program.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ivan-e...usaolp00000592

[shazeep]

this is comedy to me; the world's largest arms dealers assuming the prerogative of dictating others' level of armament. I note that McDonnel Douglas or whomever feels the need to reassure their stockholders that there will still be plenty of strife to keep their sales up if the deal goes through.

[Jito463]

Jermyn, I think part of your liberalism problem, is trusting anything posted at the Huffing-and-Puffington Post. It's nothing but a liberal rag (emphasis on the rag).