New Tattoos

Originally Posted by Berkeley

oh, I'm sorry for that...

Wachu tawkin bout Willis?

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by philjones

Wachu tawkin bout Willis?

God's country is Tennessee!!!

[Rico]

Originally Posted by triumphant1

ROTFL!!!

Ok, we can move on then...

I certainly didn't mean to start a fight...

Ok. Peace. Whew! Glad we got past that little bump in the posting road. Anyway, I do think that some tatoos can have a sexual connotation to them. I have heard of tatoos that will move a certain way to make them look alive if the person that has it is belly dancing and whatnot. Most people don't get tatoos for anything other than expressing to the world what they feel is important to them or how they view the world around them.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Berkeley

God's country is Tennessee!!!

Not in the middle of August - hot as Hades!

[triumphant1]

Originally Posted by philjones

I was actually using the comments that you made to Jekyll when he was judging wrong some things you thought were right in line.

I find you to be using the same judgmental attitude you accused him of.

Bro., I have been where all of this tattoo stuff started and you saw it on women first in pornography! It DOES have sexual connotations and has spiritual connections. If I am not mistaken you lived a pretty sheltered life so your frame of reference is not such that you can effectively judge this type of activity.

That is just my opinion!

So when we see tattoos we are supposed to go to the gutter...I don't think so.

I didn't see it on porn women and I'm thankful for that. But to say that tattoos still carry that connotation (especially in the case mentioned by Sherrie in this thread) is just wrong. And to allow your mind to wonder there is wrong too, IMO.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by triumphant1

So when we see tattoos we are supposed to go to the gutter...I don't think so.

I didn't see it on porn women and I'm thankful for that. But to say that tattoos still carry that connotation (especially in the case mentioned by Sherrie in this thread) is just wrong. And to allow your mind to wonder there is wrong too, IMO.

I saw a lady about 78 with a rose tattooed on her shoulder and to top that off she was wearing a tube top.....there was NOTHING sexual about that!

It was a withered rose.

[tamor]

Originally Posted by Berkeley

Naw.. he's not in Tennessee!!

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Not in the middle of August - hot as Hades!

Christian cussing.. ban her.... do it now!!!

[Rico]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

I saw a lady about 78 with a rose tattooed on her shoulder and to top that off she was wearing a tube top.....there was NOTHING sexual about that!

It was a withered rose.

Well, it depends. Ask an 80 something year old man and he might find it attractive.

[revrandy]

Originally Posted by triumphant1

So when we see tattoos we are supposed to go to the gutter...I don't think so.

I didn't see it on porn women and I'm thankful for that. But to say that tattoos still carry that connotation (especially in the case mentioned by Sherrie in this thread) is just wrong. And to allow your mind to wonder there is wrong too, IMO.

Bro.. You ain't right.. I think Phil Jones has nailed it.. any type of imagery on the body isn't for the benefit of the one but to be seen...

They show friends, family.. and others.. their tattoo...

I don't understand Pastors, Pastor's wives and church leadership defending Tattoo's???