George Zimmerman Trial Live Streaming

[KWSS1976]

To tell you the truth I would not be suprised if they come back with a guity verdict on the F____ING PUNKS words that George said I can see where that has hate in it..

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by KWSS1976

To tell you the truth I would not be suprised if they come back with a guity verdict on the F____ING PUNKS words that George said I can see where that has hate in it..

Yes, that is part of what I am feeling too. Oh, I know what it is now. I feel the whole issue is the point that GZ should have stayed in his truck. It's been pushed and pushed and pushed. Not only in the trial, but all over the Net.

That is what is going to cause the trouble if he is acquitted. I'm not worried about him being acquitted if he gets manslaughter. They can appeal and bring a full case with all the evidence the Prosecution withheld. But, the unrest is over GZ not staying put, even though it wasn't an illegal act for him to leave his vehicle.

[Pressing-On]

I am understanding on the Manslaughter charge that there is a case, in Florida law, where the ruling was appealed as you must offer all three instructions or options, i.e. , 2A, 2B and 2C. They only offered 2A, which is culpable negligence.

Maybe the Defense knew about the case and didn't put the Prosecution on notice.

[KWSS1976]

On HLN they had some of the spectators that were in the courtroom today and they said when John Guy was up 3 of the Juriors were crying,so we will see....

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by KWSS1976

On HLN they had some of the spectators that were in the courtroom today and they said when John Guy was up 3 of the Juriors were crying,so we will see....

I heard it was only one that was "seemingly" teared up. I wouldn't put it past HLN to be exaggerating. After all, Nancy cuts Frank Taaffe's mic when he got into TM's marijuana use. She didn't want that discussed. LOL!

[Subdued]

Do you think the jurors realize what's going on outside the courtroom as far as threats of rioting and violence?

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I am understanding on the Manslaughter charge that there is a case, in Florida law, where the ruling was appealed as you must offer all three instructions or options, i.e. , 2A, 2B and 2C. They only offered 2A, which is culpable negligence.

Maybe the Defense knew about the case and didn't put the Prosecution on notice.

Interesting!

[KWSS1976]

I read Nancy Grace bio on the net and I am suprised she still has a job anywhere, I would of fired her along time ago...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Grace

[KWSS1976]

Subdued I think they are aware on what going on outside.

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Yes, that is part of what I am feeling too. Oh, I know what it is now. I feel the whole issue is the point that GZ should have stayed in his truck. It's been pushed and pushed and pushed. Not only in the trial, but all over the Net.

That is what is going to cause the trouble if he is acquitted. I'm not worried about him being acquitted if he gets manslaughter. They can appeal and bring a full case with all the evidence the Prosecution withheld. But, the unrest is over GZ not staying put, even though it wasn't an illegal act for him to leave his vehicle.

I think that will present a problem as well - the fact that he got out of his vehicle. I do think that GZ wanted to have a visual on TM... no crime there! NONE! But many don't see it that way - they judge him for that. But when I heard the call to non-emergency for the first time, I immediately knew why GZ continued to follow TM and why he got out of his truck. The dispatcher kept ASKING GZ for info on TM. In *my* mind, that means, "Watch him." In order to watch him, GZ might need to follow in the same direction... yes, FOLLOW TM. Again, no crime there! NONE!

Anyway, I think you're right on this issue.