How to destroy a thread - Page 15

rgcraig · #**141** 10-05-2009, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toof

Might I ask...WHO is confused?

As I stated...some here are confused but I ain't one.

I asked because I received a warnign from ADMIN against calling someone a liar. I was just wondering if you received a similiar PM.

LOL - - yes, you are confused.

It's sad to watch you twist this around.

So, you are upset that you received a warning is what is bothering you mostly.

If you can't see the difference in:

A person stating THEIR opinion and because YOU don't agree they are a liar.

Oppposed to:

A person being deceitful and signing up someone to whatever as someone else without their knowledge.

MissBrattified · #**142** 10-05-2009, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toof

I have answered this.

Sorry, I didn't see it.

If you're saying "liar" over the adding names thing, what did you call him a liar about FIRST?

rgcraig · #**143** 10-05-2009, 08:13 PM

Well, Toof, the opposite happened to me in this thread.

You've gone UP a knotch in my eyes for helping with the laundry!

Baron1710 · #**144** 10-05-2009, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

In this case, not exactly. The joke wasn't just on EA--it was also on anyone who viewed the site and saw EA's name there--and didn't check back to find that it was removed.

I quote Dr. Phil to my kids all the time--"It's only funny if the victim is laughing."

Additionally, it put EA in the awkward position of having to request that his name be removed.

There were no victims. Get over it. The fact is only a few people who are a little touched in the head really cared who signed that stupid thing. It was a funny thing to do especially since Ed was so outspoken about it.

He was not put in an awkward position. Good grief.

Besides while you were busy trying to be clever you forgot to answer the question. If deception is lying then don't ever throw a surprise party.

rgcraig · #**145** 10-05-2009, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

There were no victims. Get over it. The fact is only a few people who are a little touched in the head really cared who signed that stupid thing. It was a funny thing to do especially since Ed was so outspoken about it.

He was not put in an awkward position. Good grief.

Besides while you were busy trying to be clever you forgot to answer the question. If deception is lying then don't ever throw a surprise party.

Oh no, now Toof is gonna ask you for an apology for lying.

rgcraig · #**146** 10-05-2009, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

There were no victims. Get over it. The fact is only a few people who are a little touched in the head really cared who signed that stupid thing. It was a funny thing to do especially since Ed was so outspoken about it.

He was not put in an awkward position. Good grief.

Besides while you were busy trying to be clever you forgot to answer the question. If deception is lying then don't ever throw a surprise party.

Now, you are confused. You asked me that......lol!

If the person asks you "are you planning a party for me" and you say no, then YES you are lying. Planning a party and not telling them is a surprise - not deception.

Baron1710 · #**147** 10-05-2009, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Oh no, now Toof is gonna ask you for an apology for lying.

Ha, I never lie.

I just massage the truth until it fits.

Encryptus · #**148** 10-05-2009, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

There were no victims. Get over it. The fact is only a few people who are a little touched in the head really cared who signed that stupid thing. It was a funny thing to do especially since Ed was so outspoken about it.

He was not put in an awkward position. Good grief.

Besides while you were busy trying to be clever you forgot to answer the question. If deception is lying then don't ever throw a surprise party.

WOW. Side of you I have never seen. Bad day in court? Metro traffic getting to you?

Take Prov. out to dinner and get a good nights sleep bro.

rgcraig · #**149** 10-05-2009, 08:22 PM

Baron,

Think of it this way - what if Ed had made a statement to his board members or church members about NOT signing the wedeclare, then one of them signed on and saw his name there.

That's not funny and then puts Ed having to defend something he didn't do.

rgcraig · #**150** 10-05-2009, 08:24 PM

Was the irony of Ed's name being on the list funny - - yes, it was, had Ed signed his own name.

However, someone else doing it was wrong.