Does it have a cup holder for your popcorn?!!! Cause if it doesn't, that is NOT good!
Yep, and one for coffee, too!
(For the record, I am not wheelchair-bound, myself. Just my avatar. Thought it was cute, since my real name is Tim. I do, however, have what some would call "handicaps"! E.g., I'm a skeptic! )
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty
(For the record, I am not wheelchair-bound, myself. Just my avatar. Thought it was cute, since my real name is Tim. I do, however, have what some would call "handicaps"! E.g., I'm a skeptic!)
Well, ya'll have fun with this thread today. I have got to get something done today!!!
(For the record, I am not wheelchair-bound, myself. Just my avatar. Thought it was cute, since my real name is Tim. I do, however, have what some would call "handicaps"! E.g., I'm a skeptic! )
(And I betcha my avatar is part of the reason you guys love me! Everybody loves Timmaaay! Well, almost everybody. )
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty
Are you saying no minister is qualified to comment until his own children have passed the age of 20?
MOW's covenant of earrings and NO tattoos is unbiblical, and unwise.
Since you reason MOW's sons are grown, older than mine, do you suggest I follow MOW's lead? It seems whatever he tried to do failed. If you go back and re-read MOW's post, MOW tells us his boys BROKE said covenant with their pastor and father. In view of this, I should still follow his lead? Again, because his children reached the age of 20 before mine?
I don't understand how a failed compromise of a contract (which carried no dire consequences that we know of) can be a template we all should rally behind. MOW "the boys' father" thought tattoos were unacceptable to him. MOW makes a covenant with the boys. This covenant states earrings may be worn at the committing to the contract only if tattoos are not worn.
This is a compromise which failed to deter the boys from breaking a contract with their father and pastor.
I don't need 20 year old children to understand a flawed premise.
I was raised around individuals who had parents who smoked reefers with them in attempts to deter them from doing harder substances with other people. It didn't work with any of them.
If the father didn't wear earrings himself, to allow his children to wear them to deter the wearing of a more permanent item, (that he doesn't wear), sends a message the father's laws are subject to change through pressure.
So, do you believe all ministers and councilors must have raised their children to adulthood to be able to judge between a right and a wrong concerning their own children?
The point is someone who has not raised their kids to adulthood does not have the experience to know what works and what doesn't. My wife and I tease my oldest that he is our practice child to see what works. I am convinced that a good upbringing is very beneficial to a child however I am equally convinced that their is no formula by which you can raise kids to do exactly as you want them to act as adults. I have seen to many kids who grew up in the same families go completely different directions.
God created Adam and Eve perfect and yet they failed, does that make God a bad Father for placing the tree in the Garden?
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
I have a tattoo and I had a woman tell me once that the bible said it was a sin to get a tattoo - think I ticked her off when I fell in the floor laughing at her self-righteous antics
In a heartbeat, everyone deserves a defense. Their guilt is not relevant, most of them that are in that position are guilty, but that doesn't mean there may not be mitigating circumstances. Seems to me Jesus defended me when I was guilty. You don't think rapists and child molesters need a defense?
Really? Jesus defended you when you were guilty? I thought you REPENTED so that you could be forgiven??? Where do you draw the line, Brother? You are supposed to be APOSTOLIC? And now you insinuate you are capable of defending someone you believe did WRONG in the eyes of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, whom you are supposed to believe in, supposed to even, in fact, carry HIS SPIRIT around?
My goodness, am I communicating with Holy Ghost filled people, or just intelligent elements of society? Please clarify. I'm astounded at times the discussions I have with people professing to have the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ dwelling in their bodies, their TEMPLES. . . .dare I write further and suggest. . .people who KNOW JESUS IS GOD and not a part of God???
We are to be a LIGHT amongst darkness, not join them!!!
Excuse me but if a child molester and rapist need defense then they should seek counselors who are like unto them. NOT those who are supposed to profess righteousness. Maybe you didn't understand my question, because to get those individuals charges dropped you would have to find loopholes, and therefore, lie.
__________________ "all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
~Declaration of Independence
)
Well, almost everybody. 
)
Linear Mode
